Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Daily Spirit-guided thought for 05/09/08.
* ABChung.LiveJournal . com /127621.html
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as the Son of
Man ...
... by being hungrier:
* TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Hunger
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyOne
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyTwo
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyThree
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyFour
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/Bob
... gone:
* YouTube . com /watch?v=Qb6d_z5C35E
Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Love/TheTruth
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/Luke6_21
A simple parable for the wise and discerning:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:
* TheWellnessFoundation . com /BeHealthier
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of * EmoryCardiology . com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as the Son of
Man ...
... by being hungrier:
* TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD
Hunger is wonderful:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Hunger
It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.
Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyOne
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyTwo
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyThree
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/CrazyFour
* HeartMDPhD . com /Convicts/Bob
... gone:
* YouTube . com /watch?v=Qb6d_z5C35E
Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Love/TheTruth
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/BeBlessed
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/Luke6_21
A simple parable for the wise and discerning:
* HeartMDPhD . com /Parable
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:
* TheWellnessFoundation . com /BeHealthier
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of * EmoryCardiology . com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
* HeartMDPhD . com /HolySpirit/DiscipleNow
It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
supernatural beings are "true".
If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash children
in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults, able to
think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian church
wants them to believe.
They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe the
obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
supernatural beings are "true".
If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash children
in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults, able to
think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian church
wants them to believe.
They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe the
obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
Chung howls when faced with the truth, like that devil possessed girl in the
Exorcist when she had holey water tossed on her.
CHUNG!!!! BEHOOOOOOOOLD
It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
supernatural beings are "true".
If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash children
in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults, able to
think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian church
wants them to believe.
They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe the
obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
Exorcist when she had holey water tossed on her.
CHUNG!!!! BEHOOOOOOOOLD
It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
supernatural beings are "true".
If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash children
in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults, able to
think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian church
wants them to believe.
They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe the
obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
J A wrote:
> It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
> being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
> supernatural beings are "true".
>
> If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
> children in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults,
> able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian
> church wants them to believe.
>
> They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe
> the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
God is prior to truth and falsity.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.
> It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
> being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
> supernatural beings are "true".
>
> If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
> children in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults,
> able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian
> church wants them to believe.
>
> They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe
> the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
God is prior to truth and falsity.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.
On May 9, 7:53 pm, monkfish <monkfish@nowhere> wrote:
> J A wrote:
> > It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
> > being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
> > supernatural beings are "true".
>
> > If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
> > children in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults,
> > able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian
> > church wants them to believe.
>
> > They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe
> > the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
>
> God is prior to truth and falsity.
>
I know after years of postings not to expect anything from Chung, and
so far after only a few months of many posts, really nothing from
monkfish - he does seem to post far more on , alt.christnet.theology.
So if he does give a real response, which adds to the discussion,
could someone put an "*" in the title, because I would like to see if
monkfish does say anything.
I added back all headers so all those in other groups not on
alt.christnet.theology, like this one, will be able to read it.
Evidently monkfish thinks that he should decide who reads what. Why
would anyone on this group want to reply to a group that he/she does
not read. I am not going to ask monkfish because all I will get back,
that is if it is sent to this group, is more of the same.
> J A wrote:
> > It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
> > being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
> > supernatural beings are "true".
>
> > If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
> > children in their myth - they would wait until people were young adults,
> > able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the christian
> > church wants them to believe.
>
> > They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would believe
> > the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
>
> God is prior to truth and falsity.
>
I know after years of postings not to expect anything from Chung, and
so far after only a few months of many posts, really nothing from
monkfish - he does seem to post far more on , alt.christnet.theology.
So if he does give a real response, which adds to the discussion,
could someone put an "*" in the title, because I would like to see if
monkfish does say anything.
I added back all headers so all those in other groups not on
alt.christnet.theology, like this one, will be able to read it.
Evidently monkfish thinks that he should decide who reads what. Why
would anyone on this group want to reply to a group that he/she does
not read. I am not going to ask monkfish because all I will get back,
that is if it is sent to this group, is more of the same.
mortonmullens@hotmail . com wrote:
> On May 9, 7:53 pm, monkfish <monkfish@nowhere> wrote:
>> J A wrote:
>> > It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
>> > being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
>> > supernatural beings are "true".
>>
>> > If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
>> > children in their myth - they would wait until people were young
>> > adults, able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the
>> > christian church wants them to believe.
>>
>> > They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would
>> > believe the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
>>
>> God is prior to truth and falsity.
>>
>
> I know after years of postings not to expect anything from Chung, and
> so far after only a few months of many posts, really nothing from
> monkfish - he does seem to post far more on , alt.christnet.theology.
>
> So if he does give a real response, which adds to the discussion,
> could someone put an "*" in the title, because I would like to see if
> monkfish does say anything.
>
> I added back all headers so all those in other groups not on
> alt.christnet.theology, like this one, will be able to read it.
>
> Evidently monkfish thinks that he should decide who reads what. Why
> would anyone on this group want to reply to a group that he/she does
> not read. I am not going to ask monkfish because all I will get back,
> that is if it is sent to this group, is more of the same.
Don't worry about others so much.
They are probably smarter than us.
You really should set the followup-to header.
That is the best way to deal with too much crossposting.
BTW the best way to deal with too much trolling is
to post plenty of substantive and on-topic messages.
You are interested in cardiology after all, aren't you?
PS I'm not subscribed to sci.med.cardiology.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.
> On May 9, 7:53 pm, monkfish <monkfish@nowhere> wrote:
>> J A wrote:
>> > It's common for christians to use rhetoric about "the truth" - the idea
>> > being that the various (often conflicting) stories about their mythical
>> > supernatural beings are "true".
>>
>> > If christianity were "truth", the church wouldn't need to brainwash
>> > children in their myth - they would wait until people were young
>> > adults, able to think for themselves, and then inform them of what the
>> > christian church wants them to believe.
>>
>> > They don't do that because few non-branwashed young adults would
>> > believe the obvious falsities rampant in the jesus yarn.
>>
>> God is prior to truth and falsity.
>>
>
> I know after years of postings not to expect anything from Chung, and
> so far after only a few months of many posts, really nothing from
> monkfish - he does seem to post far more on , alt.christnet.theology.
>
> So if he does give a real response, which adds to the discussion,
> could someone put an "*" in the title, because I would like to see if
> monkfish does say anything.
>
> I added back all headers so all those in other groups not on
> alt.christnet.theology, like this one, will be able to read it.
>
> Evidently monkfish thinks that he should decide who reads what. Why
> would anyone on this group want to reply to a group that he/she does
> not read. I am not going to ask monkfish because all I will get back,
> that is if it is sent to this group, is more of the same.
Don't worry about others so much.
They are probably smarter than us.
You really should set the followup-to header.
That is the best way to deal with too much crossposting.
BTW the best way to deal with too much trolling is
to post plenty of substantive and on-topic messages.
You are interested in cardiology after all, aren't you?
PS I'm not subscribed to sci.med.cardiology.
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header because trying to prove
the existence of God is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
** Atheists have blind faith in their ability to know of all actual or
possible modes of existence. Such hubris cannot be good for science.
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love13@thetruth . com > wrote in message
news:ca2ce696-eff0-4eae-9265-b54ef44cf691@34g2000hsh.googlegroups . com ...
> ... by being hungrier:
Wasssup Chang? Still want that pizza?
Disco Dance for me.
