NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

To: zerhoune@od.nih.gov, SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com ,
kshepard@calea.org, fitzmas@gmail,com , patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov,
modelt1918@sbcglobal,net , jdrazen@nejm.org, letters@courant,com ,
Jgerberding@cdc.gov, lender@courant,com , michael.cole@po.state.ct.us,
conndcj@po.state.ct.us, executive-editor@nytimes,com , managing-
editor@nytimes,com , news-tips@nytimes,com , the-arts@nytimes,com ,
bizday@nytimes,com , foreign@nytimes,com , metro@nytimes,com ,
national@nytimes,com , dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline,net ,
trvl@hotmail,com , ubinas@courant,com , mas1@concentric,net ,
campbell@courant,com , jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, kurtzh@washpost,com ,
georgewill@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us, cohencolumn@aol,com ,
FalNields@aol,com , bransfield@comcast,net , vtsherr@comcast,net ,
oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer,com ,
scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, governor.rell@po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general@po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn@usdoj.gov
Cc: francam@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
eugenerobinson@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
bmiller@newstimes,com , trvl@hotmail,com , rastro18@aol,com ,
billcurryct@gmail,com , thomas.carson@usdoj.gov, amcguigan@rms-law,com ,
rjmurzyn@aol,com , paulcraigroberts@yahoo,com ,
sidney blumenthal@yahoo,com , criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov


Subject: NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

Date: Mar 31, 2008 8:30 AM

Re: NYTimes Op-Ed below
======================================
1) The Institute of Medicine is a joke, like Yale, the CDC, New York
Medical College,
and the New England Journal of Medicine. They sided with Mark
Klempner's "long
term treatment" "study," when clearly to do so requires that the
"peers" know absolute zero about how science works:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/KLEMPNER.htm
Not only is the current testing for Lyme as bogus as a 911 dollar
bill, Yale owns
the patent for a truly valid test (5,618,533; detects 94.4% of all
cases and is
100% SPECIFIC to burgdorferi), and the rest of the world finally
realizes that Lyme
is just four of hundreds of Borrelioses.

2) If you review the older trial data of "rubella and vaccines" there
is not data, much like the LYMErix trial:
http :// www .ajph.org/cgi/reprint/61/1/152
No real data. No longer term follow ups.
Go to Medline and type in rubella and vaccine, sort by date, and start
reading backwards.
There is *no long term follow up data* on the safety of these
vaccines.

Scrutinize the LYMErix trial (again, see the ActionLyme homepage).
Yale and SmithKline
had no data, yet NIAID's Anthony Fauci spoke the 100% exact opposite
of the
truth about it on CNN Lou Dobbs Show:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/The Fauci Files.htm

So, conventional wisdom on Lyme is deliberately completely wrong.
We learned from "LYMErix and Lyme Disease" - the twin hoaxes - that
not
everyone can get all vaccines, since some people will be either immune
incompetent
(in that they fail to be protected) or they have a hypersensitivity
reaction to
either the antigens or the carrier (it does not have to be
Thimerosal).

The CDC insists the Steere IgG method to diagnose Lyme Borreliosis is
accurate,
and Gary Wormser wrote a set of "guidelines" for Lyme which is based
on
the Klempner trial, when the Klempner trial relied on the Steere's
kind of Lyme
for diagnosis (in fact, Klempner insisted on the Steere case
definition as the only
kind of Lyme, on interview), which Gary Wormser reported missed 85% of
the cases
(see these reports on the current homepage):
http :// www .actionlyme.org/HOW RICO WILL BE CHARGED.htm
Wormser on Steere's Accuracy:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/DEARBORN WHO SAID WHAT.htm

That's why I say that Wormser makes a false claim (the www .idsociety.org
's
"guidelines" on Lyme) to support the *first* false claim: that the
CDC's
method to diagnose Lyme is "accurate," since this is the only way to
get
out of his personal lawsuits over the ImmuLyme trial, which are still
ongoing:
http :// groups.google,com /group/scilyme2/t/943c89c38ace0978?hl=en

Words like Accuracy, Specificity, Precision, Ruggedness, Linearity,
Recovery from
matrix, Limit of Detection or Limit of Quantitation have real meaning
according
to the FDA. These meanings are misapplied in the Lyme and LYMErix
scam. Here are
some examples:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/A.%20Weinstein.htm
Arthritis Rheum 1994 Aug;37(8):1206-11

Western blot band intensity analysis. Application to the diagnosis
of Lyme arthritis.
Kowal K, Weinstein A.
New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.

OBJECTIVE. To determine the usefulness of quantitative band-
intensity analysis
of Western blots for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. METHODS. IgG
Western blots
for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi were performed on sera from 39
patients with
Lyme arthritis, 30 patients with syphilis, 50 patients with connective
tissue diseases,
and 10 healthy individuals. Band positions and band intensities were
calculated
using a computerized image analysis system. RESULTS. Lyme arthritis
patients had
more bands and higher-intensity bands than did non-Lyme patients. The
presence of
at least 2 bands of moderate to high intensity (> 40 optical units) or
at least
5 bands of lower intensity (> 20 optical units) was over 90% sensitive
and 100%
specific for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. A 60-kd band was present
in all Lyme
arthritis patients. The presence of an 83-, 39-, 21-, or 18-kd band
was highly specific
for Lyme arthritis. CONCLUSION. Band intensity analysis increases the
objectivity
and accuracy of Western blot interpretation for the diagnosis of Lyme
arthritis.
PMID: 8053960 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

================"Western blot interpretation increases the objectivity."- That's
not a criteria for the validation of an analytical method. This is
like saying
"Only 6 ton elephants may be called elephants" or "Only partially
pregnant."

Do plain old regular MDs know these things?
No.
They're clearly all Kool-Aid Drinkers or Medical Authoritarians.

- - -
So there you have the entire US Medical Community WRONG on Lyme
Disease diagnosis.

"Lyme Disease" - a new disease invented entirely by the cabal and
remains
imaginary - is "a hypersensitivity reaction to Borrelial antigens
based on
HLA- a population of HLA representatives that is no more than 30% of
the US population
(and likelier 15%)."
http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=PureSearch&db=pubmed&term=steere%20AC%5BAuthor%5D%20AND%20HLA%5BAll%20Fields%5D
Go ahead and look at all those ALlen Steere's HLA MedLine reports.
"Lyme Disease" is actually the exact thing SmithKline was sued over:
"The genetically linked arthritis caused by OspA or LYMErix."


Here you can see the difference in antibody concentration:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/USDOJ COMPLAINT RICO.htm
And here you can see that this was deliberate:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE CHP3.htm
if you look at all the graphics included.


3) An infection-based model of neurodevelopmental damage (UCal,
Irvine, CDC Bioweapons
Central, West Coast:
http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10518583?ordinalposB&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed ResultsPanel.Pubmed RVDocSum

Tell me exactly where else there is even the remotest of explanations
for why kids
acquire brain damage at around 18 months- such that this is a syndrome
called REGRESSIVE
AUTISM.

Where is this syndrome in Medical History, prior to the introduction
of these vaccines?
Is it in the bible?




4) All children should be pre-screened for immune competence to all
vaccines.
This we learned from the superantigen, LYMErix, which was stated to be
a superantigen
by Tufts:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER DISCOVERS LYME TOXIN.htm

http :// www .actionlyme.org/STEALTH DISABLERS.htm
http :// patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&lP&s1=6,800,613.PN.&OS=PN/6,800,613&RS=PN/6,800,613

"Accordingly, the methods of the invention provide a powerful and
selective
approach for modulating the innate immune response pathways in animals
without giving
rise to the toxicities often associated with the native bacterial
components that
normally stimulate those pathways."

Dave Persing intended to build an entire business on what he learned
from how toxic
LYMErix was:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/EMBASSIES CORIXA TLR 13 JULY 06.htm


We all neglect "autoimmune T cells" which are the alleged mechanisms
of
autoimmunity in Lyme-Bad-Knee (which you notice, is not Lyme-Bat-Knee,
since the
bats with a fungal disease had a wasting syndrome, and not arthritis
in the knuckles,
speaking to the non-existent "National Institute of Immune Suppression
and
Infectious Disease") whenever speaking about vaccines in children, yet
there
is an entire field of medicine called Rheumatology.

Of course, there is the other aspect of autoimmune diseases called
cross-reacting
antibodies, or badly cloned lymphocytes that take what as once a non-
HLA-binding
antigen and it becomes a hypersensitivity complex.

There are plenty of obvious mechanisms and areas of immunity that are
entirely neglected/911-Commissioned
that for some tard to get an OpEd page in the Times after the father
of this autistic
kid- himself an MD at John Hopkins - said "These vaccines are not for
everyone,"
leads one to wonder if everyone involved in vaccines is a Gary Wormser
or a Larry
Zemel:

LIE to cover up the LIES, deploy duh DCF to blame the parents....
Kidnap kids that might have the disease that reveals the falsehood
behind the vaccines
and then kill her...
http :// www .topix,net /forum/source/hartford-courant/TJVFVNI2SGFTT68QC



If it were true that all vaccines were for all people, why would we
have an area
of research called "Race-Specific Bioweapons?" discussed in the PNAC
document?

Why is Klempner's Multiple Sclerosis-Lyme-related HLA a secret, when
he even
discussed tuberculosis in his bogus Chronic Lyme Treatment article?

The HLA's associated with the MS form of Lyme are the same HLAs that
result
in bad outcomes in tuberculosis and leprosy- All three are are either
fungi or bear
fungal antigens.
http :// www .actionlyme.org/INDEPUGNICANTS.htm
http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&CmdÞtailsSearch&Term=*0602%5BAll+Fields%5D+AND+(%22tuberculosis%22%5BMeSH+Terms%5D+OR+tuberculosis%5BText+Word%5D)


How, then, can all vaccines be fine for all children?

This really needs to be worked up into a formal paper that parents can
take to court
to show that it is WELL-KNOWN that NOT EVERYONE has the exact same
immune system
and that there is such a thing as immune incompetence, genetically
linked immune
abnormalities, autoimmunity, hypersensitivity, Rheumatology, HIV
susceptibilities,
race-specific bioweapons...


Kathleen M. Dickson


http :// www .nytimes,com /2008/03/31/opinion/31offit.html? r=1&oref=slogin

The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By

March 31, 2008
Op-Ed Contributor
Inoculated Against Facts
By PAUL A. OFFIT

Philadelphia

ON March 6, Terry and Jon Poling stood outside a federal courthouse in
Atlanta,
Ga., with their 9-year-old daughter Hannah and announced that the
federal government
had admitted that vaccines had contributed to her autism. The news was
shocking.
Health officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and
at the American
Academy of Pediatrics have steadfastly assured the public that
vaccines do not cause
autism. Now, in a special vaccine claims court, the federal government
appeared
to have said exactly the opposite. What happened?

The answer is wrapped up in the nature of the unusual court where the
Poling case
was heard. In 1986, after a flood of lawsuits against vaccine makers
threatened
the manufacture of vaccines for children, Congress created the
National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, financed by a tax on every dose of
vaccine.

As part of the program, a group of scientists, doctors and lawyers
listed all the
health problems that might be linked to vaccines. The oral polio
vaccine could in
rare cases cause paralysis, for example, and an early version of the
rotavirus vaccine
might cause intestinal blockage. (In the interest of full disclosure:
I am a co-inventor
and co-patent holder of a newer rotavirus vaccine.)

If, at a trial in a special court, a preponderance of scientific
evidence suggested
that a vaccine caused one of these problems, a family would be
compensated quickly,
generously and fairly. Because no one could sue vaccine makers without
going through
this special court, the number of lawsuits against vaccine makers fell
drastically.

The system worked fine until a few years ago, when vaccine court
judges turned their
back on science by dropping preponderance of evidence as a standard.
Now, petitioners
need merely propose a biologically plausible mechanism by which a
vaccine might
cause harm -- even if their explanation contradicts published studies.
In 2006, for
example, Dorothy Werderitsh claimed in the vaccine court that a
hepatitis B vaccine
had triggered an autoimmune response in her brain that led to multiple
sclerosis.
Two large studies had clearly shown that hepatitis B vaccine could
neither cause
nor exacerbate multiple sclerosis, but the court ruled in favor of Ms.
Werderitsh,
elevating a hypothesis above epidemiological evidence.

The Hannah Poling case is similar. In 2000, when Hannah was 19 months
old, she received
five shots against nine infectious diseases. Over the next several
months, she developed
symptoms of autism. Subsequent tests showed that Hannah has a
mitochondrial disorder
-- her cells are unable to adequately process nutrients -- and this
contributed to
her autism. An expert who testified in court on the Polings' behalf
claimed that
the five vaccines had stressed Hannah's already weakened cells,
worsening her disorder.
Without holding a hearing on the matter, the court conceded that the
claim was biologically
plausible.

On its face, the expert's opinion makes no sense. Even five vaccines
at once would
not place an unusually high burden on a child's immune system. The
Institute of
Medicine has found that multiple vaccines do not overwhelm or weaken
the immune
system. And although natural infections can worsen symptoms of chronic
neurological
illnesses in children, vaccines are not known to.

"There is no evidence that children with mitochondrial enzyme
deficiencies are worsened
by vaccines," Salvatore DiMauro, a professor of neurology at Columbia
who is the
nation's leading expert on the disorder, told me. Indeed, children
like Hannah Poling
who are especially susceptible to infections are most likely to
benefit from vaccines.

Supporters of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program argue reasonably
that the
program should err on the side of overcompensation -- a relief valve
that is needed
in a society that mandates vaccines. But there is a price for this
largesse. In
the past few years, parents of 4,800 autistic children have filed
claims to the
vaccine court which have yet to be heard. And average awards in other
recent vaccine
cases have been more than $800,000. Furthermore, because uncompensated
claims in
vaccine court can spill into state courts, the Poling decision will
likely draw
more personal-injury lawyers to the fray. "It's a beginning," said
Kevin Conway,
a Boston-based lawyer who represents more than 1,200 families with
vaccine injury
claims.

The vaccine court should return to the preponderance-of-evidence
standard. But much
damage has already been done by the P