Found at the bad, bad irresponsible Pfizer Liberry....NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

Found at the bad, bad irresponsible Pfizer Liberry....NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

To: SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com , zerhoune@od.nih.gov,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com , kshepard@calea.org, fitzmas@gmail,com ,
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, modelt1918@sbcglobal,net ,
jdrazen@nejm.org, letters@courant,com , Jgerberding@cdc.gov,
lender@courant,com , michael.cole@po.state.ct.us,
conndcj@po.state.ct.us, executive-editor@nytimes,com , managing-
editor@nytimes,com , news-tips@nytimes,com , the-arts@nytimes,com ,
bizday@nytimes,com , foreign@nytimes,com , metro@nytimes,com ,
national@nytimes,com , dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline,net ,
trvl@hotmail,com , ubinas@courant,com , mas1@concentric,net ,
campbell@courant,com , jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, kurtzh@washpost,com ,
georgewill@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us, cohencolumn@aol,com ,
FalNields@aol,com , bransfield@comcast,net , vtsherr@comcast,net ,
oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer,com ,
scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, governor.rell@po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general@po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn@usdoj.gov
Cc: francam@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
eugenerobinson@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
bmiller@newstimes,com , trvl@hotmail,com , rastro18@aol,com ,
billcurryct@gmail,com , thomas.carson@usdoj.gov, amcguigan@rms-law,com ,
rjmurzyn@aol,com , paulcraigroberts@yahoo,com ,
sidney blumenthal@yahoo,com , criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov

Subject: Found at the bad, bad irresponsible Pfizer Liberry....NYT:
Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!

Date: Mar 31, 2008 12:36 PM

http :// www .actionlyme.org/index.htm

"Immunologic Deficiencies Diseases in Man"

Bad, bad, "irresponsible parent," Kathleen Dickson, "goes to the
library," explained Nancy Martin to duh DCF:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/Hilarious.htm

Kids with congenital Lyme:
http :// www .actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm

In time, I will provide the rest of the proofs which show that the way
to find out
if your kid has an immune deficiency is to have him/her vaccinated.

I promise it won't be pretty.


Kathleen M. Dickson



-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathleen <janmusinski@earthlink,net >
>Sent: Mar 31, 2008 8:30 AM
>Subject: [SpinLyme] NYT: Falsehoods on Vaccines- ENOUGH ALREADY !!
>
>Re: NYTimes Op-Ed below
>======================================>
>1) The Institute of Medicine is a joke, like Yale, the CDC, New York Medical
College, and the New England Journal of Medicine. They sided with
Mark Klempner's
"long term treatment" "study," when clearly to do so requires
that the "peers" know absolute zero about how science works:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/KLEMPNER.htm
>Not only is the current testing for Lyme as bogus as a 911 dollar bill, Yale
owns the patent for a truly valid test (5,618,533; detects 94.4% of
all cases and
is 100% SPECIFIC to burgdorferi), and the rest of the world finally
realizes that
Lyme is just four of hundreds of Borrelioses.
>
>2) If you review the older trial data of "rubella and vaccines" there
is not data, much like the LYMErix trial:
> http :// www .ajph.org/cgi/reprint/61/1/152
>No real data. No longer term follow ups.
>Go to Medline and type in rubella and vaccine, sort by date, and start reading
backwards.
>There is *no long term follow up data* on the safety of these vaccines.
>
>Scrutinize the LYMErix trial (again, see the ActionLyme homepage). Yale and
SmithKline had no data, yet NIAID's Anthony Fauci spoke the 100% exact
opposite
of the truth about it on CNN Lou Dobbs Show:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/The Fauci Files.htm
>
>So, conventional wisdom on Lyme is deliberately completely wrong.
>We learned from "LYMErix and Lyme Disease" - the twin hoaxes - that
not everyone can get all vaccines, since some people will be either
immune incompetent
(in that they fail to be protected) or they have a hypersensitivity
reaction to
either the antigens or the carrier (it does not have to be
Thimerosal).
>
>The CDC insists the Steere IgG method to diagnose Lyme Borreliosis is accurate,
and Gary Wormser wrote a set of "guidelines" for Lyme which is based
on
the Klempner trial, when the Klempner trial relied on the Steere's
kind of Lyme
for diagnosis (in fact, Klempner insisted on the Steere case
definition as the only
kind of Lyme, on interview), which Gary Wormser reported missed 85% of
the cases
(see these reports on the current homepage):
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/HOW RICO WILL BE CHARGED.htm
>Wormser on Steere's Accuracy:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/DEARBORN WHO SAID WHAT.htm
>
>That's why I say that Wormser makes a false claim (the www .idsociety.org
's "guidelines" on Lyme) to support the *first* false claim: that
the CDC's method to diagnose Lyme is "accurate," since this is the
only way to get out of his personal lawsuits over the ImmuLyme trial,
which are
still ongoing:
> http :// groups.google,com /group/scilyme2/t/943c89c38ace0978?hl=en
>
>Words like Accuracy, Specificity, Precision, Ruggedness, Linearity, Recovery
from matrix, Limit of Detection or Limit of Quantitation have real
meaning according
to the FDA. These meanings are misapplied in the Lyme and LYMErix
scam. Here are
some examples:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/A.%20Weinstein.htm
>Arthritis Rheum 1994 Aug;37(8):1206-11
>
> Western blot band intensity analysis. Application to the diagnosis of Lyme
arthritis.
> Kowal K, Weinstein A.
> New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.
>
> OBJECTIVE. To determine the usefulness of quantitative band-intensity analysis
of Western blots for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. METHODS. IgG
Western blots
for antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi were performed on sera from 39
patients with
Lyme arthritis, 30 patients with syphilis, 50 patients with connective
tissue diseases,
and 10 healthy individuals. Band positions and band intensities were
calculated
using a computerized image analysis system. RESULTS. Lyme arthritis
patients had
more bands and higher-intensity bands than did non-Lyme patients. The
presence of
at least 2 bands of moderate to high intensity (> 40 optical units) or
at least
5 bands of lower intensity (> 20 optical units) was over 90% sensitive
and 100%
specific for the diagnosis of Lyme arthritis. A 60-kd band was present
in all Lyme
arthritis patients. The presence of an 83-, 39-, 21-, or 18-kd band
was highly specific
for Lyme arthritis. CONCLUSION. Band intensity analysis increases the
objectivity
and accuracy of Western blot interpretation for the diagnosis of Lyme
arthritis.
PMID: 8053960 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
>
>================>"Western blot interpretation increases the objectivity."- That's
not a criteria for the validation of an analytical method. This is
like saying
"Only 6 ton elephants may be called elephants" or "Only partially
pregnant."
>
>Do plain old regular MDs know these things?
>No.
>They're clearly all Kool-Aid Drinkers or Medical Authoritarians.
>
>- - -
>So there you have the entire US Medical Community WRONG on Lyme Disease diagnosis.
>
>"Lyme Disease" - a new disease invented entirely by the cabal and
remains imaginary - is "a hypersensitivity reaction to Borrelial
antigens based
on HLA- a population of HLA representatives that is no more than 30%
of the US population
(and likelier 15%)."
> http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=PureSearch&db=pubmed&term=steere%20AC%5BAuthor%5D%20AND%20HLA%5BAll%20Fields%5D
>Go ahead and look at all those ALlen Steere's HLA MedLine reports.
>"Lyme Disease" is actually the exact thing SmithKline was sued over:
>"The genetically linked arthritis caused by OspA or LYMErix."
>
>
>Here you can see the difference in antibody concentration:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/USDOJ COMPLAINT RICO.htm
>And here you can see that this was deliberate:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE CHP3.htm
>if you look at all the graphics included.
>
>
>3) An infection-based model of neurodevelopmental damage (UCal, Irvine, CDC
Bioweapons Central, West Coast:
> http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10518583?ordinalposB&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed ResultsPanel.Pubmed RVDocSum
>
>Tell me exactly where else there is even the remotest of explanations for why
kids acquire brain damage at around 18 months- such that this is a
syndrome called
REGRESSIVE AUTISM.
>
>Where is this syndrome in Medical History, prior to the introduction of these
vaccines?
>Is it in the bible?
>
>
>
>
>4) All children should be pre-screened for immune competence to all vaccines.
>This we learned from the superantigen, LYMErix, which was stated to be a superantigen
by Tufts:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER DISCOVERS LYME TOXIN.htm
>
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/STEALTH DISABLERS.htm
> http :// patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&lP&s1=6,800,613.PN.&OS=PN/6,800,613&RS=PN/6,800,613
>
>"Accordingly, the methods of the invention provide a powerful and selective
approach for modulating the innate immune response pathways in animals
without giving
rise to the toxicities often associated with the native bacterial
components that
normally stimulate those pathways."
>
>Dave Persing intended to build an entire business on what he learned from how
toxic LYMErix was:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/EMBASSIES CORIXA TLR 13 JULY 06.htm
>
>
>We all neglect "autoimmune T cells" which are the alleged mechanisms
of autoimmunity in Lyme-Bad-Knee (which you notice, is not Lyme-Bat-
Knee, since
the bats with a fungal disease had a wasting syndrome, and not
arthritis in the
knuckles, speaking to the non-existent "National Institute of Immune
Suppression
and Infectious Disease") whenever speaking about vaccines in children,
yet
there is an entire field of medicine called Rheumatology.
>
>Of course, there is the other aspect of autoimmune diseases called cross-reacting
antibodies, or badly cloned lymphocytes that take what as once a non-
HLA-binding
antigen and it becomes a hypersensitivity complex.
>
>There are plenty of obvious mechanisms and areas of immunity that are entirely
neglected/911-Commissioned that for some tard to get an OpEd page in
the Times after
the father of this autistic kid- himself an MD at John Hopkins - said
"These
vaccines are not for everyone," leads one to wonder if everyone
involved in
vaccines is a Gary Wormser or a Larry Zemel:
>
>LIE to cover up the LIES, deploy duh DCF to blame the parents....
>Kidnap kids that might have the disease that reveals the falsehood behind the
vaccines and then kill her...
> http :// www .topix,net /forum/source/hartford-courant/TJVFVNI2SGFTT68QC
>
>
>
>If it were true that all vaccines were for all people, why would we have an
area of research called "Race-Specific Bioweapons?" discussed in the
PNAC
document?
>
>Why is Klempner's Multiple Sclerosis-Lyme-related HLA a secret, when he
even discussed tuberculosis in his bogus Chronic Lyme Treatment
article?
>
>The HLA's associated with the MS form of Lyme are the same HLAs that result
in bad outcomes in tuberculosis and leprosy- All three are are either
fungi or bear
fungal antigens.
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/INDEPUGNICANTS.htm
> http :// www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&CmdÞtailsSearch&Term=*0602%5BAll+Fields%5D+AND+(%22tuberculosis%22%5BMeSH+Terms%5D+OR+tuberculosis%5BText+Word%5D)
>
>
>How, then, can all vaccines be fine for all children?
>
>This really needs to be worked up into a formal paper that parents can take
to court to show that it is WELL-KNOWN that NOT EVERYONE has the exact
same immune
system and that there is such a thing as immune incompetence,
genetically linked
immune abnormalities, autoimmunity, hypersensitivity, Rheumatology,
HIV susceptibilities,
race-specific bioweapons...
>
>
>Kathleen M. Dickson
>
>
> http :// www .nytimes,com /2008/03/31/opinion/31offit.html? r=1&oref=slogin
>
>The New York Times
>Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
>
>March 31, 2008
>Op-Ed Contributor
>Inoculated Against Facts
>By PAUL A. OFFIT
>
>Philadelphia
>
>ON March 6, Terry and Jon Poling stood outside a federal courthouse in Atlanta,
Ga., with their 9-year-old daughter Hannah and announced that the
federal government
had admitted that vaccines had contributed to her autism. The news was
shocking.
Health officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and
at the American
Academy of Pediatrics have steadfastly assured the public that
vaccines do not cause
autism. Now, in a special vaccine claims court, the federal government
appeared
to have said exactly the opposite. What happened?
>
>The answer is wrapped up in the nature of the unusual court where the Poling
case was heard. In 1986, after a flood of lawsuits against vaccine
makers threatened
the manufacture of vaccines for children, Congress created the
National Vaccine
Injury Compensation Program, financed by a tax on every dose of
vaccine.
>
>As part of the program, a group of scientists, doctors and lawyers listed all
the health problems that might be linked to vaccines. The oral polio
vaccine could
in rare cases cause paralysis, for example, and an early version of
the rotavirus
vaccine might cause intestinal blockage. (In the interest of full
disclosure: I
am a co-inventor and co-patent holder of a newer rotavirus vaccine.)
>
>If, at a trial in a special court, a preponderance of scientific evidence suggested
that a vaccine caused one of these problems, a family would be
compensated quickly,
generously and fairly. Because no one could sue vaccine makers without
going through
this special court, the number of lawsuits against vaccine makers fell
drastically.
>
>The system worked fine until a few years ago, when vaccine court judges turned
their back on science by dropping preponderance of evidence as a
standard. Now,
petitioners need merely propose a biologically plausible mechanism by
which a vaccine
might cause harm -- even if their explanation contradicts published
studies. In 2006,
for example, Dorothy Werderitsh claimed in the vaccine court that a
hepatitis B
vaccine had triggered an autoimmune response in her brain that led to
multiple sclerosis.
Two large studies had clearly shown that hepatitis B vaccine could
neither cause
nor exacerbate multiple sclerosis, but the court ruled in favor of Ms.
Werderitsh,
elevating a hypothesis above epidemiological evidence.
>
>The Hannah Poling case is similar. In 2000, when Hannah was 19 months old, she
received five shots against nine infectious diseases. Over the next
several months,
she developed symptoms of autism. Subsequent tests showed that Hannah
has a mitochondrial
disorder -- her cells are unable to adequately process nutrients -- and
this contributed
to her autism. An expert who testified in court on the Polings' behalf
claimed that
the five vaccines had stressed Hannah's already weakened cells,
worsening her disorder.
Without holding a hearing on the matter, the court conceded that the
claim was biologically
plausible.
>
>On its face, the expert's opinion makes no sense. Even five vaccines at once
would not place an unusually high burden on a child's immune system.
The Institute
of Medicine has found that multiple vaccines do not overwhelm or
weaken the immune
system. And although natural infections can worsen symptoms of chronic
neurological
illnesses in children, vaccines are not known to.
>
>"There is no evidence that children with mitochondrial enzyme deficiencies are
worsened by vaccines," Salvatore DiMauro, a professor of neurology at
Columbia who
is the nation's leading expert on the disorder, told me. Indeed,
children like Hannah
Poling who are especially susceptible to infections are most likely to
benefit from
vacci