DURLAND P. ADAMS....Re: [SpinLyme] Spy satellites- What's the big deal? Durland Fish is already doin

DURLAND P. ADAMS....Re: [SpinLyme] Spy satellites- What's the big deal? Durland Fish is already doin

To: SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com , zerhoune@od.nih.gov,
SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com , kshepard@calea.org, fitzmas@gmail,com ,
patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, modelt1918@sbcglobal,net ,
jdrazen@nejm.org, letters@courant,com , Jgerberding@cdc.gov,
lender@courant,com , michael.cole@po.state.ct.us,
conndcj@po.state.ct.us, executive-editor@nytimes,com , managing-
editor@nytimes,com , news-tips@nytimes,com , the-arts@nytimes,com ,
bizday@nytimes,com , foreign@nytimes,com , metro@nytimes,com ,
national@nytimes,com , dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline,net ,
trvl@hotmail,com , ubinas@courant,com , mas1@concentric,net ,
campbell@courant,com , jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, kurtzh@washpost,com ,
georgewill@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us, cohencolumn@aol,com ,
FalNields@aol,com , bransfield@comcast,net , vtsherr@comcast,net ,
oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer,com ,
scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, governor.rell@po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general@po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn@usdoj.gov
Cc: francam@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
eugenerobinson@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
bmiller@newstimes,com , trvl@hotmail,com , rastro18@aol,com ,
billcurryct@gmail,com , thomas.carson@usdoj.gov, amcguigan@rms-law,com ,
rjmurzyn@aol,com , paulcraigroberts@yahoo,com ,
sidney blumenthal@yahoo,com , criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov

Subject: DURLAND P. ADAMS....Re: [SpinLyme] Spy satellites- What's the
big deal? Durland Fish is already doing this.

Date: Apr 8, 2008 9:02 AM

Watch to see that nothing is done about McSweegan and Fish although I
must have
filed about 200 thousand complaints about their illegal behavior to
the "proper
authorities" including in hard copy. What that tells you is that
there are
no authorities of any kind. Not intellectually, not morally, and not
as regards
"law enforcement." That is why Charlton Heston, after years of
playing
a hero, became one, since the Second Amendment gives Americans the
right to overthrow
this insane excuse for a government (go to the next link to see the
hyperlinks):

http :// www .actionlyme.org/DURLAND P ADAMS.htm

Recall that "ChristoPher Adams" is the name of the imaginary superhero
in that idiot Edward McSweegan's fiction book called "Deliberate
Release,"
and ever since then this troll stalker posts all sorts of personal
information about
Lyme victims on the internet. It's Durland Fish, the ALDF,com cabal's
top
spy.
We don't think Durland is married, but if he is, he is no longer quite
in the
closet, since he always talks about penises, especially, Edward
McSweegan's
penis. Those two conspire together. Ed is at the NIH steering
contracts into Durland's
www .ALDF,com cabal, which was founded at New York Medical College in
1990, and was
intended to profiteer of off test kits and vaccines for vector-borne
diseases, after
Sweeg trashed the Navy, since this was their work since WWII when the
Navy took
back the booty from Unit 731 in Manchuria. Now we find that Pam3Cys
lipopeptide
are also found in Hoof and Mouth Disease, which they clearly worked
with on Plum
Island.
We think that all of this criminal nonsense and participation in the
Lyme crimes
(lying to the CT AG, owning patents with SmithKline in Europe which
demonstrate
they know the current testing schema for Lyme is bogus) demonstrates
that the CDC
approves of this crime, but one can still file a RICO complaint
against INDIVIDUALS
in the government, if one cannot sue the CDC for committing the cover
up of the
ACCIDENTAL RELEASE of Lyme from Plum Island.
Are these crooks stupid or what? If they had just kept their mouths
shut we would
not have looked into this crime, but instead they harassed and stalked
the Lyme
victims. Now the whole world thinks they're INCOMPREHENSIBLE and
STUPID, and
Yale lost megamillions in NIH and private investment.


Rockefeller took over. 1) "The ability of the borrelia, especially
tick-borne
strains to persist in the brain and in the eye after treatment with
arsenic or with
penicillin or even after apparent cure is well known (1). The
persistence of treponemes
after treatment of syphilis is a major area which currently requires
additional
study (3,5,10,11). -Jay Sanford, US Military Hospital, Bethesda


That slays me.
Since originally it was Mortimer Zuckerman, Hank Greenberg, et al.
http :// www .actionlyme.org/ALDF BOARD.htm

Now it's my (distant) cousins, the Rockefellers, who are investigating
ACTIONABLE
treatments for neurologic diseases in private venture cap.


-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathleen <janmusinski@earthlink,net >
>Sent: Apr 7, 2008 5:08 PM
>Subject: [SpinLyme] Soy satellites- What's the big deal? Durland Fish is
already doing this.
>
>Don't be silly, Yale's Durland Fish has a NASA contract to use their
satellites for commercial purposes. He and Sweeg (Edward McSweegan)
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/McSweegan.htm
>had already been caught wiretapping and stalking the Lyme Foundation- over which
there was a civil suit since the FBI consistently refuses to do their
jobs.
>Durland has expanded his spy network to include the www .otaotr,com
>(Or maybe it is the other way around.)
>
>No one authorized Durland to be involved in individual cases of Lyme disease,
such as Karen Forschner and myself, who have kids with congenital Lyme
disease:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
>No one authorized Sweeg and Durland to harass and stalk, and call the DCF on
Lyme victims. No one authorized this criminal cabal to defraud the
nation over
"Lyme Disease," but now the whole world knows we're incompetent to
basic science, and these scientific fraud facts are the issue for the
Pope. The
Pope is not speaking to the little people when discussing the new
deadly sins.
He is talking to the corporate elite. He is talking to the Lyme
cabal. He is
talking to the State of Corrupticut for their lies over Lyme, and
creating poverty
through medical neglect- the very thing disclaimed by this cabal:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/RICO CHRONOLOGY.htm
>
>There is a ton of commercial spying going on as already discussed, when I reported
about Zone Alarm.... and MicroSoft reporting back everything you view
or listen
to.
>
>KMDickson
>
>
> http :// rawstory,com /news/2008/DHS domestic spy satellite plan lacks 0407.html
>
>DHS ignores civil liberties in domestic spy satellite plan, lawmakers say
>Nick Juliano
>Published: Monday April 7, 2008
>
>| StumbleUpon
>
>
>Print This Email This
>
>Homeland Security Committee members fault Chertoff for delaying legal framework
for new office
>
>A controversial plan that would allow domestic law enforcement agencies to use
data gathered by US spy satellites still lacks necessary civil
liberties and privacy
protections, and three Democratic lawmakers are urging Department of
Homeland Security
Chair Michael Chertoff to established a legal framework for the new
plan he promised
six months ago.
>
>DHS plans to create a new office that would expand law enforcement and other
civilian agencies' access to data gathered by powerful intelligence
and military
satellites orbiting the earth. The National Applications Office will
oversee who
can access such satellite data, which is typically used to monitor
climate change
and track hurricane damage, among other uses.
>
>DHS still has not laid out legal frameworks or standard operating procedures
for the office, according to a letter from three members of the House
Homeland Security
Committee.
>
>"We recently learned that the Department has begun to advertise for positions
at the NAO. While we applaud the Department's efforts to prepare for
the future,
we are disappointed by its continuing pattern of putting the cart
before the horse,"
wrote Reps. Bennie G. Thompson, the committee's chair; Jane Harman,
chair of
an intelligence subcommittee; and Christopher P. Carney, chair of an
oversight subcommittee.
>
>The lawmakers said they were concerned about the "privacy and civil liberties
challenges" posed by the domestic satellite program. They said a legal
framework
for the program was missing from the NAO's charter, which "had been
finalized
without any input from this committee ... or the privacy and civil
liberties community.
>
>"Instead of crafting a privacy and civil liberties solution for the Department's
NAO law enforcement customers or updating us about a summer date for
its completion,
the NAO Charter now makes clear that this critical undertaking will be
postponed
until an unspecified time in the future," they write. "This is
unacceptable."
>
>The domestic spy satellite plan was first proposed last August, and its expected
launch in October was delayed because of privacy concerns. The
lawmakers' letter,
which was sent Monday, makes clear those concerns remain.
>
> Although we support any Department effort to engage in more effective and
responsive information sharing with our nation's first preventers, the
serious
privacy and civil liberties issues that the NAO raises are manifold
and multifaceted.
Doing business with the NAO's law enforcement and other customers
therefore
requires a robust and detailed legal framework and SOPs that provide
clearly defined
privacy and civil liberties safeguards. Merely mentioning Posse
Comitatus and other
laws in the NAO Charter does not provide needed assurances that the
Department will
not transform NAO into a domestic spying platform. Furthermore,
delaying the hard
work of addressing the privacy and civil liberties issues specific to
law enforcement
customers further erodes our confidence that you are serious about
serving their
needs. It's frankly time for the Department to lead on privacy and
civil liberties
in this area -- not shirk a difficult duty.
>
>The NAO would expand access to data gathered by Mass Intelligence (MASINT) satellites,
which according to reports use radar and infrared imaging technologies
to see through
cloud cover, forest canopies and even concrete barriers. Allowing
local police forces
access to such data raises substantial questions about whether the
door to 4th Amendment
violations is being flung open.
>
>A Congressional Research Service report prepared last month outlined some of
these concerns. It concluded that privacy concerns were likely to be
dependent upon
the type of technology used. That, the lawmakers said in their letter
Monday, has
still not been clarified by DHS.
>
>------------------------------------
>