Group: sci.med.diseases.lyme

Lyme Disease: patient support, research & information.

Add group to favorites Add group to favorites
   indietro Back to post list     indietro Send new message to group
Search:

Post Subject:

SAY IT IN UNISON, FOLKS...

Reply from: McSweegan is INSANE
Date: 10 Apr 2008, 11:29
SAY IT IN UNISON, FOLKS...

To: Kathleen <janmusinski@earthlink,net >, jmcgowan@nih.gov,
zerhoune@od.nih.gov, SpinLyme@yahoogroups,com , kshepard@calea.org,
fitzmas@gmail,com , patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov,
modelt1918@sbcglobal,net , jdrazen@nejm.org, letters@courant,com ,
Jgerberding@cdc.gov, lender@courant,com , michael.cole@po.state.ct.us,
conndcj@po.state.ct.us, executive-editor@nytimes,com , managing-
editor@nytimes,com , news-tips@nytimes,com , the-arts@nytimes,com ,
bizday@nytimes,com , foreign@nytimes,com , metro@nytimes,com ,
national@nytimes,com , dvbid@cdc.gov, brigidcallahan@optonline,net ,
trvl@hotmail,com , ubinas@courant,com , mas1@concentric,net ,
campbell@courant,com , jhornberger@fff.org, thomas.carson@usdoj.gov,
thomas.ryan@po.state.ct.us, kurtzh@washpost,com ,
georgewill@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
commissioner.dcf@po.state.ct.us, cohencolumn@aol,com ,
FalNields@aol,com , bransfield@comcast,net , vtsherr@comcast,net ,
oca@po.state.ct.us, dand@davila-dilzer,com ,
scott.murphy@po.state.ct.us, governor.rell@po.state.ct.us,
attorney.general@po.state.ct.us, randall.samborn@usdoj.gov
Cc: francam@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadinejad@president.ir,
eugenerobinson@washpost,com , horgan@courant,com ,
bmiller@newstimes,com , trvl@hotmail,com , rastro18@aol,com ,
billcurryct@gmail,com , thomas.carson@usdoj.gov, amcguigan@rms-law,com ,
rjmurzyn@aol,com , paulcraigroberts@yahoo,com ,
sidney blumenthal@yahoo,com , criminal.division@usdoj.gov,
karla.dobinski@usdoj.gov, christopher.christie@usdoj.gov

Subject: SAY IT IN UNISON, FOLKS...

Date: Apr 10, 2008 5:28 AM

http :// www .actionlyme.org/STEALTH DISABLERS.htm

FROM BARBOUR's (CDC "officer") FLAGELLA-LESS SPIROCHETE PATENT (below)

Note that no one can have an antibody to flagellin (band 41) and be
sick, yet antibodies
to flagellin being toxic is the reason there is no flagellar vaccine
for Lyme.
Let me say that more clearly: No one who has band 41 is allowed to
either have
Lyme disease or be sick, yet because band 41 is associated with how
Lyme makes us
sick is the reason we can't have a Lyme vaccine based on flagellin.

Make sense?

No. But then again, the Infectious Diseases Society of America says
Lyme is not
either fatal or chronic, while at the same time they themselves have
published that
Lyme is associated with about 1/2 the Lou Gehrig's Diseases cases.

Make sense?

No.

So what's the answer?

Say it in unison, folks:

"GIVE THE LYING LYME CROOKS MORE GRANT MONEY TO PUBLISH MORE BOGUS
ARTICLES,
AND TRY TO SELL MORE BOGUS VACCINES FOR A DISEASE THAT THEY ALSO CLAIM
DOES NOT
EXIST!!!"

http :// patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/PTO/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,585,102.PN.&OS=PN/5,585,102&RS=PN/5,585,102



-----Original Message-----
>From: Kathleen <janmusinski@earthlink,net >
>Sent: Apr 10, 2008 5:11 AM

>Subject: CDC in WaPo: BS!! Don't guve them any more money. Dissolve this
insane military-profieteering organization.
>
>No.
>
>(WaPo ARTICLE BELOW)
>
>They - the CDC - do not need more money to be incompetent fools. Their incompetence
is deliberate. The CDC never told us there was nothing we could do
about Lyme except
get rid of the deer, since one of their "officers," Alan Barbour:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/LYME IS A PERMANENT BRAIN INFECTION.htm
>owned a patent for an OspA vaccine (ImmuLyme, over which Gary Wormser is still
being dued), and they participated in the Dearborn bogus testing scam.
>
>In fact, Dearborn was *THEIR* GIG (CDC's).
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/DICKSON FDA SUBMISSION FULL.htm
>Included in my FDA presentation package given to all the FDA Vaccine Committee
members was the CDC's Dearborn invitation.
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/Dearborn Who Approved.htm
>There's a page right out of the Dearborn booklet.
>
>CDC said not to use the Steere strain to diagnose Lyme (for Western Blotting),
yet that was the bogus strain from which Steere invented this totally
bullshit standard.
>
>HOW STUPID DOES IT GET?
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/CRYMEDISEASE CHP3.htm
>ALL ABOUT THE CRAZY ALLEN STEERE.
>
>
>CDC then BLEW OFF all the recommendations of all the invited labs- as I told
the FDA Vaccine Committee in Jan 2001, followed by NIH's Edward
McSweegan TRASHING
ME, for doing the entire DHHS's jobs for them:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/McSweegan Stalking Feb 2001 38a561b9b28962b5.htm
>
>There he is, posting illegally and anonymously, harassing Lyme victims.
>
>
>CDC then also LIED to CT AG Richard Blumenthal in his 2004 Lyme Hearing, and
said they would change their website to show that the bogus Dearborn
method (invented
by CDC officer Allen Steere in Europe), was not to be used to diagnose
Lyme.
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/LymeFraudShort.htm
>
>The CDC did the opposite, one year later, on Feb 11, 2005.
>
>This is bullshit.
>Every time some dot guv clique gets caught being incompetent slime balls, they
complain that their job is too tough, and that they need more money:
>
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/ADD MORE PSYCHOPATHS.htm
>
>Awww w. The poor thiiinnngggsss!!
>
>This is bullshit. We do not need the CDC. They're profiteering lying fools
and should never be allowed near anyone's children. See the graphics
on my
home page for some examples of what happens to children who are not
pre-screened
for immune competence to any of the forced vaccines and their
adjuvants:
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/index.htm
>
>Nobody needs this insane crap from yet another clique of incompetent, greedy,
lying FOOLS!!!
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/CDCS PARTICIPATION IN LYME CRIMES.htm
>
>There is a complaint to the House Oversight Committee, demonstrating that the
CDC knows the current testing for Lyme is bogus. THEY KNOW IT IS
BOGUS, because
in their patents, they identify the genetic HLA differences, and that
this has an
effect on Western Blot results.
>
>THAT is crime, and should be charged as homicide.
> http :// www .actionlyme.org/USDOJ COMPLAINT RICO.htm
>
>Kathleen M. Dickson
>
>---------------------------------------------
>
>
> http :// www .washingtonpost,com /wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/09/AR2008040902369 pf.html
>
>Climate Change Brings Health Risks
>
>By H. JOSEF HEBERT
>The Associated Press
>Wednesday, April 9, 2008; 6:03 PM
>
>WASHINGTON -- A top government health official said Wednesday that climate change
is expected to have a significant impact on health in the next few
decades, with
certain regions of the country and the elderly and children most
vulnerable
to increased health problems.
>
>Howard Frumkin, a senior official of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
gave a detailed summary on the likely health impacts of global warming
at a congressional
hearing. But he refrained from giving an opinion on whether carbon
dioxide, a leading
greenhouse gas, should be regulated as a danger to public health.
>
>"The CDC doesn't have a position on ... EPA's regulatory decisions,"
said Frumkin, determined to avoid getting embroiled in the contentious
issue over
whether the Environmental Protection Agency should regulate CO2 under
the federal
Clean Air Act.
>
>The Supreme Court a year ago declared CO2 a pollutant under the federal air
quality law and told the EPA it must determine whether CO2's link to
climate
change endangers public health or welfare. If it does, it must be
regulated, said
the court. But the EPA has been slow to respond to the court
directive, saying it
must review such a regulation's broad impact on emissions from
everything from
cars and power plants to schools.
>
>"To the science, there is strong evidence the carbon dioxide is a greenhouse
gas ... and that there is strong evidence that climate change affects
public health
in many ways," responded Frumkin, carefully gauging his words, when
pressed
by Rep. Hilda Solis, D-Calif., on the issue.
>
>Frumkin, director of CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, outlined
the range of "major anticipated health" issues as a result of climate
change.
>
>Among them, the prospects of more heat waves that are of special danger to the
elderly and the poor; more incidents of extreme weather posing a
danger of drought
in some areas and flooding in others; increase of food-borne and
waterborne infectious
diseases; more air pollution because of higher temperatures; and the
migration into
new areas of vector-borne and zoonotic diseases such as Lyme disease,
West Nile
virus, malaria or dengue fever as seasonal patterns change.
>
>"Over the next few decades in the United States, climate change is likely
to have a significant impact on health," Frumkin told the House Select
Committee
on Energy Independence and Global Warming.
>
>The Atlanta-based CDC is considered the government's premier disease tracking
and monitoring agency.
>
>Frumkin's testimony focused in greater detail and more directly on the likely
human health risk of global warming than testimony given last October
by the agency's
director, Julie Gerberding, before the Senate Environment and Public
Works Committee.
>
>It was later learned that the White House had heavily edited Gerberding's
testimony, deleting whole sections of the prepared remarks including
one entitled
"Climate Change is a Public Concern."
>
>"CDC considers climate change a serious public health concern," Frumkin
told the House committee Wednesday.
>
>Frumkin said he recognized the issue of global warming and public health "remains
controversial, and some of my testimony may not necessarily reflect
broad consensus
across the administration."
>
>But Solis, who chaired the hearing, said she suspected that "a layer of
screening" continues to limit what CDC officials are allowed to say,
particularly
regarding the agency's ability to deal with the health risks.
>
>Solis said she was perturbed that the administration did not give the committee
Frumkin's testimony in advance, as is customary, and that he did not
have more
to say "on how we could empower the CDC. I don't think we heard that."
>
>Jonathan Patz, professor of environmental and health sciences at the University
of Wisconsin, told the committee the CDC doesn't have the money "to
support
the efforts to protect us from climate change."
>
>"I think their hands are tied," said Patz.
>
>The president has asked Congress for $8.8 billion for the CDC during the 2009
fiscal year, $412 million less than Congress provided this year.
>
>Pressed on the budget issue by several lawmakers, Frumkin replied: "We're
doing everything we can with existing resources now. ... With further
resources
we would be able to do more."
>
>
>
>On the Net:
>
>Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http :// www .cdc.gov
>© 2008 The Associated Press




Login:
  Username:    Password: 
 
   Lost Password? click here!
Thread: