Group: sci.med.diseases.cancer
Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cancer.
Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
though I noticed an ad for
such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
curative.
Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
though I noticed an ad for
such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
curative.
Re: Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> though I noticed an ad for
> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> curative.
What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
What IS your point?
On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> though I noticed an ad for
> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> curative.
What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
What IS your point?
Re: Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>
> > Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> > though I noticed an ad for
> > such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> > three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> > I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> > curative.
>
> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>
> What IS your point?
I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
these confusing ambiguities:
http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>
> > Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> > though I noticed an ad for
> > such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> > three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> > I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> > curative.
>
> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>
> What IS your point?
I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
these confusing ambiguities:
http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
Re: Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
On Mar 1, 10:09 am, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>
> > On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>
> > > Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> > > though I noticed an ad for
> > > such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> > > three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> > > I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> > > curative.
>
> > What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
> > think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>
> > What IS your point?
>
> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
> these confusing ambiguities:
>
> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitam...
Guaranteed blood preessure elevator (inclinator in Vegas)
http :// www .humanevents,com /offers/offer.php?id=HEO101
On Mar 1, 10:09 am, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>
> > On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>
> > > Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
> > > though I noticed an ad for
> > > such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
> > > three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>
> > > I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
> > > curative.
>
> > What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
> > think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>
> > What IS your point?
>
> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
> these confusing ambiguities:
>
> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitam...
Guaranteed blood preessure elevator (inclinator in Vegas)
http :// www .humanevents,com /offers/offer.php?id=HEO101
Re: Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
on 3/1/08 9:09 AM Robert Cohen said the following:
> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
>>> though I noticed an ad for
>>> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
>>> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>>> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
>>> curative.
>> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
>> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>>
>> What IS your point?
>
> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
> these confusing ambiguities:
>
>
> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
>
>
I watch her for comedy. A classic episode was when she tried to
intimate that Sam Harris was dumb to his face. She isn't dumb, just
ignorant.
on 3/1/08 9:09 AM Robert Cohen said the following:
> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
>>> though I noticed an ad for
>>> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
>>> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>>> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
>>> curative.
>> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
>> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>>
>> What IS your point?
>
> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
> these confusing ambiguities:
>
>
> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
>
>
I watch her for comedy. A classic episode was when she tried to
intimate that Sam Harris was dumb to his face. She isn't dumb, just
ignorant.
Re: Ann Coulter Column Is Sponsored By Unorthodox Anti-Cancer Stuff
"Dan" <dannomano@nospamstuff.org> wrote in message
news:47ca0e0c$0$4953$4c368faf@roadrunner,com ...
> on 3/1/08 9:09 AM Robert Cohen said the following:
>> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>>> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
>>>> though I noticed an ad for
>>>> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
>>>> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>>>> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
>>>> curative.
>>> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
>>> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>>>
>>> What IS your point?
>>
>> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
>> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
>> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
>> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
>> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
>> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
>> these confusing ambiguities:
>>
>>
>> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
>>
>>
>
> I watch her for comedy. A classic episode was when she tried to intimate
> that Sam Harris was dumb to his face. She isn't dumb, just ignorant.
Regardless, she is HOT, with fab legs.
"Dan" <dannomano@nospamstuff.org> wrote in message
news:47ca0e0c$0$4953$4c368faf@roadrunner,com ...
> on 3/1/08 9:09 AM Robert Cohen said the following:
>> On Feb 29, 11:39 pm, Kelley Eidem <awthraw...@yahoo,com > wrote:
>>> On Feb 29, 5:32 pm, Robert Cohen <robtco...@msn,com > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that I religiously read the disgraceful, dogmstic, damne drivel,
>>>> though I noticed an ad for
>>>> such within the cut-downish, cruel, creepy, crappy column a day or
>>>> three ago, which I get by e-mail sometimes.
>>>> I'll try not to jump to an illogical judgment about the claimed
>>>> curative.
>>> What's your point? You don't like her? You don't like the ads? You
>>> think Coulter has some say-so about the ads?
>>>
>>> What IS your point?
>>
>> I luv/hate her crafty b.s., and you just love it, or the opposite?
>> My point is that her column's sponsor is an anti-establishment cure
>> purveyor, which to me is politically interesting.
>> If she doesn't have a say-so in who advertizes within her call-yums,
>> then I won't really eat a Delll Inspiron w/o catsup and tartar sauce.
>> Meanehile, I am qualified to take a medical stance....not re such as
>> these confusing ambiguities:
>>
>>
>> http :// articles.mercola,com /sites/articles/archive/2008/3/1/are-vitamin-supplements-a-bad-idea-for-cancer-patients.aspx
>>
>>
>
> I watch her for comedy. A classic episode was when she tried to intimate
> that Sam Harris was dumb to his face. She isn't dumb, just ignorant.
Regardless, she is HOT, with fab legs.
Next: Vitamin supplements overall found to be useless in preventing cancer, researchers...
Previous: scientists find more ways PGE2 drives cancer cell proliferation
