Re: Kids On Drugs: Antidepressants And Ritalin (Generation Rx)On Apr 24, 2:16 am, Jeff L <jeffrey.lat...@gmail . com > wrote:
> Pixie wrote:
> > On Apr 23, 10:51 pm, Jeff L <jeffrey.lat...@gmail . com > wrote:
> >> Brittany wrote:
> >>> Did you know that most school shootings and acts of mass violence are
> >>> committed by people on antidepressants who showed no signs of violence
> >>> before being medicated? Go to
> >>> * badpsych . com /2008/04/22/kids-on-drugs-antidepressants-and-rita...
> >>> to view more
> >> The actual facts aren't on your side, sorry.
>
> > COOL you know this for a fact? tell us where you cite your facts from
> > then? also, the withdrawals of these medications can mess you up as
> > well as going on them. if this is your argument then perhaps people
> > that are suffering heroin withdrawals that create crime to obtain
> > their med should actually NEED to be medicated and its not heroins
> > fault at all that crime is committed its because they NEED to be
> > medicated!!! most heroin crime is not committed ON the drug, its
> > withdrawals when people need their fix.
First of all, I asked for you to CITE YOUR EVIDENCE AND YOU CANT (or
didnt) so replying to my post ws completely irrelevant, would you like
to give me a recipe for cookies now too?
Second of all, you NEVER even responded to my example or defended your
position on it, so basically, your talking shit and not even
responding to my post even if hitting the reply button which is rather
curious.
> Here's the blunt truth, whether you like it or not: no medication can
> force a person to act in a certain way.
REALLY? And what about all those people on pot or LSD that thought
they could fly? presumably they always thought they could fly? Its all
just fucking chemicals prozac or pot or heroin.
>That is to say, this bullshit
> about anti-depressants causing people to erupt in violence is, indeed,
> total bullshit - because antidepressants are not capable of forcing a
> behavior pattern.
If they arent capable of changing BEHAVIOUR PATTERNS THEY WOULDNT BE
GIVEN OUT!! wake the hell up. if medication could not change your
behaviour pattern psychiatrists WOULDNT HAND THEM OUT THERE WOULD BE
NO POINT! YOU HAVE COMPLETELY ARGUED THAT YOUR POINT IS INVALID ALL BY
YOURSELF. sounds like something only a clown would do, or someone that
proves to themselves their point is invalid.
> To back up your claim that antidepressants give you an uncontrollable
> urge to kill your family, you cite a few one-off cases.
I never cited a case. (are you seeing things?) the only thing i
"cited" was heroin withdrawals. which is a phenomenon known by society
and police and the medical profession (not saying all junkies do this
however)
> Yet you entirely
> ignore any or all the variables that would be involved,
yeah, like maybe you were part of their family and you drove them to
it with your incessant nonsense.
> and merely jump
> to a conclusion based on an association fallacy.
where did i do that? please cite your words, do you even know who you
are responding to?
> Your logic, or rather
> lack thereof, follows like so:
>
> 1. Psychiatry is inherently evil
never said that, i said that psychiatrists are stupid and they have no
idea how the "new improved drugs" effect people.
geez, do you even READ WHAT IS WRITTEN? or do you make it up in your
brain all yourself?
> 2. Drugs prescribed for psychiatric purposes are inherently evil
I said that psychiatrists get people addicted to drugs, society
generally tends to think of addiction as bad, i also stated that they
dish out drugs willy nilly, not knowing what effects they will have on
a patient. or long term health. use yourself as a guinea pig thanks.
jesus you do make bizarre gross over generalisations not based on
things you've read dont you? perhaps you should get your eyesight
tested?
> 3. [insert random fifteen-minute celebrity here] killed [x person/number
> of people
never said anyone killed anyone, i have listed no such cases or claims
(were you even responding to my post? or wasnt this meant for me?)
> 4. [insert random fifteen-minute celebrity here] was on anti-depressants
> at some point during his/her life
i dont know jack shit about any celebrity, and i certainly never
stated what drugs they took, i am beginning to think this post wasnt
for me or you are deluded. (you should see a psychiatrist about
that!)
> 6. Ergo, all anti-depressants cause violent tendencies
I think you are rather haphazard with your over generalisations and
choice of words, i hope you arent an author! I never said ALL
antidepressants caused violent tendencies, in fact i never said they
made people violent in the first place, i said they fuck people up and
what fucked upness happens depends on the individuals chemistry.
gee, do you write science fiction too??
> 7. Psychiatry is inherently evil
have you been drinking? you are repeating yourself, i thought number 1
was that? oh you are talking shit again and going in a circle when, in
fact the circle was nipped in the bud long ago and you are just going
off in a tangent.
> 8. Drugs prescribed for psychiatric purposes are inherently evil
> 9. Ad nauseum circlejerkular argument
>
> It's bad science, bad logic, and total bullshit, not matter how you
> slice it.
I SAID CITE YOUR SOURCES YOU DO JACK SHIT except make up some random
shit, you have not cited sources, you just come up with some weird
overgeneralisation bullshit, citing wrong "logic arguments", and not
citing ANY SCIENTIFIC DATA TO SUPPORT your claim depsite claiming to
know FACTS.
do you masturbate like this often to yourself? it doesnt seem terribly
amusing.
However, I must give apologies for interrupting your wank as it didnt
seem directed at anything i had said. so, please carry on without me.