Group: sci.med.psychobiology
Dialog and news in psychiatry and psychobiology.
Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have
as males.
That's the ultimate sacred cow.
If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have
as males.
That's the ultimate sacred cow.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
[etc.]
> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
Sue
--
She hears mooing from another dimension, but there isn't
a cow in sight... - heard in a commercial
collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
[etc.]
> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
Sue
--
She hears mooing from another dimension, but there isn't
a cow in sight... - heard in a commercial
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
"Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
Even if it was well done?
"Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
Even if it was well done?
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
"Dogma Discharge" <s@c.c.c> wrote:
> "Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
>> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
>> [etc.]
>>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>>
>> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
> Even if it was well done?
Even if it was on a hoagie roll with cheese and onions.
Sue
--
"Everybody's stupid except me!" - Homer Simpson
"Dogma Discharge" <s@c.c.c> wrote:
> "Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
>> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
>> [etc.]
>>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>>
>> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
> Even if it was well done?
Even if it was on a hoagie roll with cheese and onions.
Sue
--
"Everybody's stupid except me!" - Homer Simpson
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
Cheezits <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote:
>collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
>[etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
>I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
>Sue
Rofl. I just love these faggots who are so intimidated by women that
they have to pretend to be superior to them, when that is genetically
impossible. Free hint, collection: the X chromosome. Look into it.
It's just like white "supremacists", who only prove how paranoid they
are of non-whites being anything remotely close to the same as they
are. Retarded.
--
Joel Crump
.... And the only thing I *do* recognize right now, is a political
fiasco here, that I am about to avoid by lettin' this buttfucking
Brady Bunch go!
Cheezits <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote:
>collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
>[etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
>I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
>Sue
Rofl. I just love these faggots who are so intimidated by women that
they have to pretend to be superior to them, when that is genetically
impossible. Free hint, collection: the X chromosome. Look into it.
It's just like white "supremacists", who only prove how paranoid they
are of non-whites being anything remotely close to the same as they
are. Retarded.
--
Joel Crump
.... And the only thing I *do* recognize right now, is a political
fiasco here, that I am about to avoid by lettin' this buttfucking
Brady Bunch go!
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
Joel wrote:
> Rofl. I just love these faggots who are so intimidated by women that
> they have to pretend to be superior to them, when that is genetically
> impossible. Free hint, collection: the X chromosome. Look into it.
I've read that the Y chromosome has actually been getting smaller and
smaller throughout the history of the human species, and is eventually
going to disappear entirely.
--
--Sean
http :// spclsd223.livejournal,com /
'What else turns you on? Drugs? Casual sex? Rough sex? ... Casual rough
sex? I'm a doctor, I need to know.' --Dr Gregory House
Joel wrote:
> Rofl. I just love these faggots who are so intimidated by women that
> they have to pretend to be superior to them, when that is genetically
> impossible. Free hint, collection: the X chromosome. Look into it.
I've read that the Y chromosome has actually been getting smaller and
smaller throughout the history of the human species, and is eventually
going to disappear entirely.
--
--Sean
http :// spclsd223.livejournal,com /
'What else turns you on? Drugs? Casual sex? Rough sex? ... Casual rough
sex? I'm a doctor, I need to know.' --Dr Gregory House
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
["Followup-To:" header set to talk.origins.]
On 2007-04-24, Cheezits <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote:
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
I wouldn't want to meat the person who had a beef with women's equality.
Mark
>
> Sue
["Followup-To:" header set to talk.origins.]
On 2007-04-24, Cheezits <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote:
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
I wouldn't want to meat the person who had a beef with women's equality.
Mark
>
> Sue
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
"Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
Here's a man who tried. Look what happened to him:
http :// www .ukmm.org.uk/issues/suppression/nl.htm
T.
"Cheezits" <Cheezits32@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:Xns991C61741E4AFcheezits32hotmailcom@130.81.64.196...
> collection60@googlemail,com uddered:
> [etc.]
>> That's the ultimate sacred cow.
>
> I wouldn't steak my reputation on that.
>
Here's a man who tried. Look what happened to him:
http :// www .ukmm.org.uk/issues/suppression/nl.htm
T.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> males.
*All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
majority in positions of power and authority?
About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
Whether any one trait should be considered an advantage depends on point
of view, right?
Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> males.
*All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
majority in positions of power and authority?
About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
Whether any one trait should be considered an advantage depends on point
of view, right?
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
(in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>> males.
So she turned you down again, eh? There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
Trying using some.
>
> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
Not that there's anything _wrong_ with that, of course.
>
> Whether any one trait should be considered an advantage depends on point
> of view, right?
>
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
(in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>> males.
So she turned you down again, eh? There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
Trying using some.
>
> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
Not that there's anything _wrong_ with that, of course.
>
> Whether any one trait should be considered an advantage depends on point
> of view, right?
>
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
>
> > Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
> >
> >> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> >> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> >> males.
>
> So she turned you down again, eh?
Who, your mom?
> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> Trying using some.
There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
you'll become bearable to look at.
> > *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> > exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> > females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> > majority in positions of power and authority?
> >
> > About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> > able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> > do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
That'll be you then.
J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
>
> > Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
> >
> >> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> >> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> >> males.
>
> So she turned you down again, eh?
Who, your mom?
> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> Trying using some.
There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
you'll become bearable to look at.
> > *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> > exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> > females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> > majority in positions of power and authority?
> >
> > About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> > able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> > do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
That'll be you then.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collection60@googlemail,com wrote
(in article <1177585055.338302.167890@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
> J.J. O'Shea wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
>> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
>>
>>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>>>
>>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>>>> males.
>>
>> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> Who, your mom?
>
>> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
>> Trying using some.
>
> There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> you'll become bearable to look at.
>
>>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
>>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
>>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
>>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>>>
>>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
>>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
>>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>>
>> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> That'll be you then.
>
Looks like I hit a nerve.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collection60@googlemail,com wrote
(in article <1177585055.338302.167890@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
> J.J. O'Shea wrote:
>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
>> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50.36@is.invalid>):
>>
>>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>>>
>>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>>>> males.
>>
>> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> Who, your mom?
>
>> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
>> Trying using some.
>
> There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> you'll become bearable to look at.
>
>>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
>>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
>>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
>>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>>>
>>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
>>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
>>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>>
>> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> That'll be you then.
>
Looks like I hit a nerve.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
> (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
>
>
>
>
> > J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> >> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>
> >>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
> >>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> >>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> >>>> males.
>
> >> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> > Who, your mom?
>
> >> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> >> Trying using some.
>
> > There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> > you'll become bearable to look at.
>
> >>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> >>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> >>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> >>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> >>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> >>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> >>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> >> Some boys don't like soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> > That'll be you then.
>
> Looks like I hit a nerve.
No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
> (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
>
>
>
>
> > J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> >> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>
> >>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
> >>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> >>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> >>>> males.
>
> >> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> > Who, your mom?
>
> >> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> >> Trying using some.
>
> > There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> > you'll become bearable to look at.
>
> >>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> >>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> >>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> >>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> >>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> >>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> >>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> >> Some boys don't like soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> > That'll be you then.
>
> Looks like I hit a nerve.
No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:32:03 -0400, collection60@googlemail,com wrote
(in article <1177601523.779481.130380@s33g2000prh.googlegroups,com >):
> On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
>> (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> J.J. O'Shea wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
>>>> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>>
>>>>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>>
>>>>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>>>>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>>>>>> males.
>>
>>>> So she turned you down again, eh?
>>
>>> Who, your mom?
>>
>>>> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
>>>> Trying using some.
>>
>>> There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
>>> you'll become bearable to look at.
>>
>>>>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
>>>>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
>>>>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
>>>>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>>
>>>>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
>>>>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
>>>>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>>
>>>> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
>>
>>> That'll be you then.
>>
>> Looks like I hit a nerve.
>
> No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
>
> In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
> fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
>
Yep, she turned you down, alright.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 11:32:03 -0400, collection60@googlemail,com wrote
(in article <1177601523.779481.130380@s33g2000prh.googlegroups,com >):
> On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
>> (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> J.J. O'Shea wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
>>>> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>>
>>>>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>>
>>>>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
>>>>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
>>>>>> males.
>>
>>>> So she turned you down again, eh?
>>
>>> Who, your mom?
>>
>>>> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
>>>> Trying using some.
>>
>>> There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
>>> you'll become bearable to look at.
>>
>>>>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
>>>>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
>>>>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
>>>>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>>
>>>>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
>>>>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
>>>>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>>
>>>> Some boys don't _like_ soft thighs or curvy hips.
>>
>>> That'll be you then.
>>
>> Looks like I hit a nerve.
>
> No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
>
> In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
> fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
>
Yep, she turned you down, alright.
--
email to oshea dot j dot j at gmail dot com.
Re: a challenge to evolution punks
On Apr 26, 11:32 am, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote:
> On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
> > (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
> > > J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> > >> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>
> > >>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
> > >>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> > >>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> > >>>> males.
>
> > >> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> > > Who, your mom?
>
> > >> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> > >> Trying using some.
>
> > > There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> > > you'll become bearable to look at.
>
> > >>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> > >>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> > >>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> > >>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> > >>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> > >>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> > >>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> > >> Some boys don't like soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> > > That'll be you then.
>
> > Looks like I hit a nerve.
>
> No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
>
> In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
> fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
With an attitude like that I'm not surprised that they would treat you
as such.
On Apr 26, 11:32 am, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote:
> On Apr 26, 12:59 pm, "J.J. O'Shea" <try.not...@but.see.sig> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 06:57:35 -0400, collectio...@googlemail,com wrote
> > (in article <1177585055.338302.167...@t39g2000prd.googlegroups,com >):
>
> > > J.J. O'Shea wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:18 -0400, nmp wrote
> > >> (in article <pan.2007.04.24.17.50...@is.invalid>):
>
> > >>> Op Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:25:16 -0700, schreef collection60:
>
> > >>>> If you really want to be a rebel... challenge feminism and declare all
> > >>>> the biological advantages and artificial social disadvantages we have as
> > >>>> males.
>
> > >> So she turned you down again, eh?
>
> > > Who, your mom?
>
> > >> There's a product known as 'mouth wash'.
> > >> Trying using some.
>
> > > There is a proceedure known as facial surgery. Try using some, may be
> > > you'll become bearable to look at.
>
> > >>> *All* societies in the world nowadays are male-dominated. So tell me how,
> > >>> exactly, us males are disadvantaged socially? In the private sector, do
> > >>> females get better paying jobs than us? In politics, are they in the
> > >>> majority in positions of power and authority?
>
> > >>> About those biological so-called "advantages": the typical male may be
> > >>> able to run faster and lift heavier weights than the typical female, but
> > >>> do we have thighs as soft and hips as curvaceous? ;)
>
> > >> Some boys don't like soft thighs or curvy hips.
>
> > > That'll be you then.
>
> > Looks like I hit a nerve.
>
> No. you lied that you hit a nerve.
>
> In fact I hit a nerve when I told you the truth that females are lying
> fake evil monsters who hate innocent good males.
With an attitude like that I'm not surprised that they would treat you
as such.
