Group: sci.med.psychobiology
Dialog and news in psychiatry and psychobiology.
Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
I have made a discovery
I have made a discovery
I made an interesting discovery, when we greet someone we throw our arms
around her and kiss her but before we do that we smile and raise our
eyebrowns and say hello.
Now the raising of the eyebrows is actually an arm wrapped round our head so
we move these first as our plan to raise our arms in welcome and before a
fight men flex the muscles above and behind the eyes first, and before
punching someone in the face they move a cheek muscle in the same way.
The muscles of the face and head are connected to the frontal lobe and we
try things in our face and head muscles first before actually doing
something, you notice this with children, when they are planning to do
something the look and move their faces first. If I knew the lkocation of
the several sets of our body around the head and face I could work out what
a person is thinking before they do anything.
I suppose this has been known for millenia but I've only just noticed it.
The word 'hello' is "smile - kiss" if you watch the mouth movements.
I suppose that is obvious too.
Christopher
I made an interesting discovery, when we greet someone we throw our arms
around her and kiss her but before we do that we smile and raise our
eyebrowns and say hello.
Now the raising of the eyebrows is actually an arm wrapped round our head so
we move these first as our plan to raise our arms in welcome and before a
fight men flex the muscles above and behind the eyes first, and before
punching someone in the face they move a cheek muscle in the same way.
The muscles of the face and head are connected to the frontal lobe and we
try things in our face and head muscles first before actually doing
something, you notice this with children, when they are planning to do
something the look and move their faces first. If I knew the lkocation of
the several sets of our body around the head and face I could work out what
a person is thinking before they do anything.
I suppose this has been known for millenia but I've only just noticed it.
The word 'hello' is "smile - kiss" if you watch the mouth movements.
I suppose that is obvious too.
Christopher
Re: I have made a discovery
On Oct 15, 1:01 am, "Chris" <n...@noserver . com > wrote:
> I made an interesting discovery, when we greet someone we throw our arms
> around her and kiss her but before we do that we smile and raise our
> eyebrowns and say hello.
>
> Now the raising of the eyebrows is actually an arm wrapped round our head so
> we move these first as our plan to raise our arms in welcome and before a
> fight men flex the muscles above and behind the eyes first, and before
> punching someone in the face they move a cheek muscle in the same way.
>
> The muscles of the face and head are connected to the frontal lobe and we
> try things in our face and head muscles first before actually doing
> something, you notice this with children, when they are planning to do
> something the look and move their faces first. If I knew the lkocation of
> the several sets of our body around the head and face I could work out what
> a person is thinking before they do anything.
>
> I suppose this has been known for millenia but I've only just noticed it.
>
> The word 'hello' is "smile - kiss" if you watch the mouth movements.
>
> I suppose that is obvious too.
>
> Christopher
sci.physics.research Google Group * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research
Current physics research. (Moderated) en Electromagnetic hormonics
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cc6f70bd1e36e9d1
What happens if an electromagnetic field, tuned to a specific objects
<br> frequency, is passed through that object. If I had a lab (and a
<br> degree in physics), the first thing I would do is this: Set up a
high <br> poewred magnetic field and measure the frequency of the
realative <br> nothing, creating a baseline. Next, place an object
(anythng: * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cc6f70bd1e36e9d1
steng...@gmail . com (stengela) Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:07:41 UT Re:
Noncommutative geometry and the standard model
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/96f4b969299c424f
A Dress for SM the Beggar <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow
href="ftp://ftp.alainconnes.org/dresssm.pdf">[link]</a> <br> see other
references in <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" *
w w w .alainconnes.org/bibliography.html">[link]</a>
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/96f4b969299c424f
Al.Riv...@gmail . com (arivero@unizar . es ) Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:27:49 UT
Noncommutative geometry and the standard model
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cb567b8344f28e9c
In the current issue of Physical Review Letters, there is a paper <br>
"Conceptual Explanation for the Algebra in the Noncommutative
Approach <br> to the Standard Model" by Ali H. Chamseddine and
Alain Connes: Phys. <br> Rev. Lett. 99, 191601 (2007). What do people
think of this paper? * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cb567b8344f28e9c
edcjo...@comcast . net (Edward C. Jones) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:09:11 UT
Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dfa7e7e9ae62a5b3
The Michelson-Morley experiment (MMX) actually shows nothing of the
<br> sort. It merely shows that for a Michelson interferometer on
earth the <br> fringe positions are independent of orientation. All
else is <br> INTERPRETATION, not actual experimental results. The
actual measurements <br> of the MMX show nothing whatsoever about
speed, frequency, or * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dfa7e7e9ae62a5b3
tjroberts...@sbcglobal . net (Tom Roberts) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:18
UT General Covariance * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/8d390ef03364f591
Hello <br> Can someone please explain the principle of general
covariance in <br> simple terms. <br> Thanks
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/8d390ef03364f591
hayssam.ha...@gmail . com (Hayssam) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:17 UT Re:
Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/58c2f046af5f5e99
It's a derivative with respect to velocity components of the <br>
Lagrangian, but it can still be evaluated as a derivative with respect
<br> to the coordinates, ie a gradient, of the classical action. <br>
Apparently, Stokes' Theorem will still apply, but only over the phase
<br> space, not the configuration space. That's what I wasn't getting.
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/58c2f046af5f5e99
thoov...@excite . com (Igor) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re: Bohr-
Sommerfeld Quantization question * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2f6fe53b377ad443
Thanks for pointing that out. I figured it must have had something to
<br> do with the notion of phase space, but I wasn't quite seeing it.
In <br> fact, a very good example would be the one dimensional linear
<br> oscillator. The path taken in that systerm encloses no area in
<br> configuration space, but does so in phase space.
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2f6fe53b377ad443
thoov...@excite . com (Igor) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re:
"spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re:Double
counting gravitational potential energy)
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/e85b9031738dcae3
[snip] <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" * arxiv.org/abs/
astro-ph/0609417">[link]</a> <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow
href=" * w w w .oakland.edu/physics/mog29/mog29.pdf">[link]</a> <br>
16.8995 deg/yr periastron advance PSR J0737-3039A/B <br> Agrees with
GR to the limits of observation, about 0.05%. The two <br> pulsars are
quite different in spin and fractionally different in <br> mass. <br>
A possible giant GR failing is relativistic spin-orbit coupling. The
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/e85b9031738dcae3
Uncle...@hate.spam . net (Uncle Al) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re:
Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/f401fb87ffca1a95
Hello Oz: <br> It looks like your slightly scrabble the eggs. Let's
make sure we <br> clearly state what are the invariants, and what are
covariants. The <br> word "covariant" means we all know how
it changes, and because it <br> changes, it is not an invariant. <br>
When measuring the speed of light, the speed of light is an invariant,
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/f401fb87ffca1a95
dougsweet...@gmail . com (Doug Sweetser) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:14 UT
Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2a70b6aa04789c81
The old Kopenhagen interpretation considered the so called collapse
<br> of the wave function as a physical process. This implies a lot of
<br> paradoxes not to mention that nobody has ever been able to prove
that <br> there is actually a collapse happening. <br> Nowadays most
physicists avoid the term collapse. Quantum mechanics
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2a70b6aa04789c81
Andreas.M...@nospam.de (Andreas Most) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:13 UT
MOEPED Update * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/78b968edb0901da4
The MOEPED series of experimental vehicles is all about active and
<br> passive "electric flywheels" and the search for
appropriate values of <br> energy and power density for a human-
electric hybrid. <br> MOEPED 6 (MObile Experimental Physics Education
Demonstrator no. 6) <br> comprises: <br> Lightning Cycle Dynamics 2004
Thunderbolt SWB OSS recumbent bicycle
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/78b968edb0901da4
DGo...@alum.mit.edu Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:14 UT Re: Has FTL
communication really never been tested in this way?
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/95667fadd16d6663
It's not intended to be the same, just to illustrate the importance of
<br> the coincidence counter. It's pretty similar though, aside from
being <br> discrete and classical and omitting the slits. <br> That's
wrong; it's a misunderstanding by the guy who wrote that page, <br>
and it's presumably the cause of all his other misunderstandings. The
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/95667fadd16d6663
br276delet...@cam.ac.uk (Ben Rudiak-Gould) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:13
UT Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental
counter * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dd5f2668fd722238
Sorry I've never read anywhere about imaginery wavelength. I would
<br> highly appreciate if you can cite a textbook or a website where
this <br> is analysed. <br> In a past article in this thread Eliot
Spech wrote about imaginary <br> part of the momentum. <br> I also
dont know nothing about this no have ever seen in a textbook on
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dd5f2668fd722238
kvblake2...@yahoo . com (kvblake) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:56:30 UT Re:
"spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re: Double
counting gravitational potential energy)
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2c6475d23e56368f
On Nov 7, 9:47 pm, "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to
reply]" <br> The current emphasis on flat theories of gravitation
is motivated by <br> the capacity to solve the problems of GR directly
derived from its <br> spacetime curvature modeling. Some _a priori_
advantages of a flat <br> formulation are: <br> - Unification with
rest of interactions * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2c6475d23e56368f
juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience . com (Juan R.) Fri, 09 Nov 2007
12:56:30 UT The Zurich Physics Colloquium
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/31bb060db3ea82a3
The Zurich Physics Colloquium is now made available to researchers and
<br> students from all over the world via video and audio podcasts.
<br> This semester's speakers include Gerard 't Hooft, Andre Geim,
Gerald <br> Gabrielse, ... . If you are interested, visit <br> <a
target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" *
w w w .colloquium.ethz.ch">[link]</a> <br> The Zurich Physics Colloquium
is jointly organized by the University
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/31bb060db3ea82a3
hassl...@phys.ethz.ch (Fabian) Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:52:10 UT
- Tom
On Oct 15, 1:01 am, "Chris" <n...@noserver . com > wrote:
> I made an interesting discovery, when we greet someone we throw our arms
> around her and kiss her but before we do that we smile and raise our
> eyebrowns and say hello.
>
> Now the raising of the eyebrows is actually an arm wrapped round our head so
> we move these first as our plan to raise our arms in welcome and before a
> fight men flex the muscles above and behind the eyes first, and before
> punching someone in the face they move a cheek muscle in the same way.
>
> The muscles of the face and head are connected to the frontal lobe and we
> try things in our face and head muscles first before actually doing
> something, you notice this with children, when they are planning to do
> something the look and move their faces first. If I knew the lkocation of
> the several sets of our body around the head and face I could work out what
> a person is thinking before they do anything.
>
> I suppose this has been known for millenia but I've only just noticed it.
>
> The word 'hello' is "smile - kiss" if you watch the mouth movements.
>
> I suppose that is obvious too.
>
> Christopher
sci.physics.research Google Group * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research
Current physics research. (Moderated) en Electromagnetic hormonics
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cc6f70bd1e36e9d1
What happens if an electromagnetic field, tuned to a specific objects
<br> frequency, is passed through that object. If I had a lab (and a
<br> degree in physics), the first thing I would do is this: Set up a
high <br> poewred magnetic field and measure the frequency of the
realative <br> nothing, creating a baseline. Next, place an object
(anythng: * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cc6f70bd1e36e9d1
steng...@gmail . com (stengela) Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:07:41 UT Re:
Noncommutative geometry and the standard model
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/96f4b969299c424f
A Dress for SM the Beggar <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow
href="ftp://ftp.alainconnes.org/dresssm.pdf">[link]</a> <br> see other
references in <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" *
w w w .alainconnes.org/bibliography.html">[link]</a>
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/96f4b969299c424f
Al.Riv...@gmail . com (arivero@unizar . es ) Sat, 10 Nov 2007 12:27:49 UT
Noncommutative geometry and the standard model
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cb567b8344f28e9c
In the current issue of Physical Review Letters, there is a paper <br>
"Conceptual Explanation for the Algebra in the Noncommutative
Approach <br> to the Standard Model" by Ali H. Chamseddine and
Alain Connes: Phys. <br> Rev. Lett. 99, 191601 (2007). What do people
think of this paper? * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/cb567b8344f28e9c
edcjo...@comcast . net (Edward C. Jones) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 20:09:11 UT
Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dfa7e7e9ae62a5b3
The Michelson-Morley experiment (MMX) actually shows nothing of the
<br> sort. It merely shows that for a Michelson interferometer on
earth the <br> fringe positions are independent of orientation. All
else is <br> INTERPRETATION, not actual experimental results. The
actual measurements <br> of the MMX show nothing whatsoever about
speed, frequency, or * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dfa7e7e9ae62a5b3
tjroberts...@sbcglobal . net (Tom Roberts) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:18
UT General Covariance * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/8d390ef03364f591
Hello <br> Can someone please explain the principle of general
covariance in <br> simple terms. <br> Thanks
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/8d390ef03364f591
hayssam.ha...@gmail . com (Hayssam) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:17 UT Re:
Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/58c2f046af5f5e99
It's a derivative with respect to velocity components of the <br>
Lagrangian, but it can still be evaluated as a derivative with respect
<br> to the coordinates, ie a gradient, of the classical action. <br>
Apparently, Stokes' Theorem will still apply, but only over the phase
<br> space, not the configuration space. That's what I wasn't getting.
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/58c2f046af5f5e99
thoov...@excite . com (Igor) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re: Bohr-
Sommerfeld Quantization question * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2f6fe53b377ad443
Thanks for pointing that out. I figured it must have had something to
<br> do with the notion of phase space, but I wasn't quite seeing it.
In <br> fact, a very good example would be the one dimensional linear
<br> oscillator. The path taken in that systerm encloses no area in
<br> configuration space, but does so in phase space.
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2f6fe53b377ad443
thoov...@excite . com (Igor) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re:
"spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re:Double
counting gravitational potential energy)
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/e85b9031738dcae3
[snip] <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" * arxiv.org/abs/
astro-ph/0609417">[link]</a> <br> <a target="_blank" rel=nofollow
href=" * w w w .oakland.edu/physics/mog29/mog29.pdf">[link]</a> <br>
16.8995 deg/yr periastron advance PSR J0737-3039A/B <br> Agrees with
GR to the limits of observation, about 0.05%. The two <br> pulsars are
quite different in spin and fractionally different in <br> mass. <br>
A possible giant GR failing is relativistic spin-orbit coupling. The
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/e85b9031738dcae3
Uncle...@hate.spam . net (Uncle Al) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:54:16 UT Re:
Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/f401fb87ffca1a95
Hello Oz: <br> It looks like your slightly scrabble the eggs. Let's
make sure we <br> clearly state what are the invariants, and what are
covariants. The <br> word "covariant" means we all know how
it changes, and because it <br> changes, it is not an invariant. <br>
When measuring the speed of light, the speed of light is an invariant,
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/f401fb87ffca1a95
dougsweet...@gmail . com (Doug Sweetser) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:14 UT
Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2a70b6aa04789c81
The old Kopenhagen interpretation considered the so called collapse
<br> of the wave function as a physical process. This implies a lot of
<br> paradoxes not to mention that nobody has ever been able to prove
that <br> there is actually a collapse happening. <br> Nowadays most
physicists avoid the term collapse. Quantum mechanics
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2a70b6aa04789c81
Andreas.M...@nospam.de (Andreas Most) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:13 UT
MOEPED Update * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/78b968edb0901da4
The MOEPED series of experimental vehicles is all about active and
<br> passive "electric flywheels" and the search for
appropriate values of <br> energy and power density for a human-
electric hybrid. <br> MOEPED 6 (MObile Experimental Physics Education
Demonstrator no. 6) <br> comprises: <br> Lightning Cycle Dynamics 2004
Thunderbolt SWB OSS recumbent bicycle
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/78b968edb0901da4
DGo...@alum.mit.edu Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:14 UT Re: Has FTL
communication really never been tested in this way?
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/95667fadd16d6663
It's not intended to be the same, just to illustrate the importance of
<br> the coincidence counter. It's pretty similar though, aside from
being <br> discrete and classical and omitting the slits. <br> That's
wrong; it's a misunderstanding by the guy who wrote that page, <br>
and it's presumably the cause of all his other misunderstandings. The
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/95667fadd16d6663
br276delet...@cam.ac.uk (Ben Rudiak-Gould) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:47:13
UT Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental
counter * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dd5f2668fd722238
Sorry I've never read anywhere about imaginery wavelength. I would
<br> highly appreciate if you can cite a textbook or a website where
this <br> is analysed. <br> In a past article in this thread Eliot
Spech wrote about imaginary <br> part of the momentum. <br> I also
dont know nothing about this no have ever seen in a textbook on
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/dd5f2668fd722238
kvblake2...@yahoo . com (kvblake) Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:56:30 UT Re:
"spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re: Double
counting gravitational potential energy)
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2c6475d23e56368f
On Nov 7, 9:47 pm, "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to
reply]" <br> The current emphasis on flat theories of gravitation
is motivated by <br> the capacity to solve the problems of GR directly
derived from its <br> spacetime curvature modeling. Some _a priori_
advantages of a flat <br> formulation are: <br> - Unification with
rest of interactions * groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/2c6475d23e56368f
juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience . com (Juan R.) Fri, 09 Nov 2007
12:56:30 UT The Zurich Physics Colloquium
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/31bb060db3ea82a3
The Zurich Physics Colloquium is now made available to researchers and
<br> students from all over the world via video and audio podcasts.
<br> This semester's speakers include Gerard 't Hooft, Andre Geim,
Gerald <br> Gabrielse, ... . If you are interested, visit <br> <a
target="_blank" rel=nofollow href=" *
w w w .colloquium.ethz.ch">[link]</a> <br> The Zurich Physics Colloquium
is jointly organized by the University
* groups.google . com /group/sci.physics.research/msg/31bb060db3ea82a3
hassl...@phys.ethz.ch (Fabian) Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:52:10 UT
- Tom
