Re: MMR/AUTISM - THE TAMING OF THE BRITISH MEDIA
"Brian Gaff" <Briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:CRzOj.11562$yD2.5449@text.news.virginmedia . com ...
> Yes I thought this a bit one sided. Besides, I heard a long item about
> this on a station only a couple of weeks ago, and it seemed it was far
> from a silent media. The facts seem to be that as you say, its been in use
> for many years, so if this is even partly true, what has changed?
It changed because the UK decided to dump its vaccine that had a cruddy
mumps component (Urabe strain), for the MMR vaccine that was approved in the
USA in 1971 (using the Jeryl Lynn mumps strain) in 1988.
Then some lawyer found a doctor willing to do "research" to come up with
specific results to support a lawsuit. That doctor was a gastroenterologist
who had no clinical experience with children. The doctor did not reveal
this very significant funding fact when he published a paper in the Lancet.
He also neglected to change the data when one person testing for measles
viruses from tissue invasively retrieved from a dozen children (provided by
the lawyer, since they were party to the lawsuit) found the PCR results were
useless. One of the children whose intestines were scoped for tissue now
has lifelong health problems because his intestines were perforated in 12
places!
Read the summary here:
* briandeer . com /mmr/lancet-summary.htm
> Is there an environmental factor nobody has found yet.
> No I agree that certain drug companies are discriminating when it comes to
> what they release, but its human nature, and out in the real world you
> could not surely hide the effects if what has been claimed was true.
>
> All substances have other effects to those desired but its a judgement
> call as to whether is serious or not, or even if its provable. Who is
> going to risk children in a trial when not to inoculate is risking
> epidemic. OK you say, give them the single versions, but does this cause
> any less problems?
No it does not cause less problems. There is no evidence to suggest that
giving kids three times as many jabs is any safer.
> Brian
>
> --
> Brian Gaff....Note, this account does not accept Bcc: email.
> graphics are great, but the blind can't hear them
> Email: briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
> ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> "HCN" <hcn@nospam . com > wrote in message
> news:guadnZLt4fu6AJfVnZ2dnUVZ_hCdnZ2d@comcast . com ...
>>
>> "JOHN" <john@nospam . com > wrote in message
>> news:iPSdnc2t__9jApTVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@bt . com ...
>>> * homepage.ntlworld . com /clueless.g.miller/mediataming.htm
>>>
>>> MMR/AUTISM - THE TAMING OF THE BRITISH MEDIA
>>>
>>> Here is a story of:-
>>>
>>> how autism is given to millions children worldwide by an out of control
>>> drug industry and equally out of control governments and medical
>>> establishments
>>> the media being silenced
>>>
>>> the health agenda being hijacked by industry and commerce funded lobby
>>> groups, leaving parents without warning and the dangers to their
>>> children and child health safety going unreported - so starting and
>>> continuing avoidable nightmares for the unlucky many families around the
>>> world
>>>
>>
>> The MMR has been in use since 1971. Did austism become prevelent then?
>>
>> Just post the PubMed indexed articles... random webpages are not real
>> evidence.
>>
>
>