The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

* w w w .whale.to/vaccines/safer.html

the 200 year old lie.

Eg the MMR is safe lie * w w w .whale.to/vaccine/mmr2.html that they trot
out most days.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

On Oct 18, 10:20 pm, "JOHN" <j...@nospam . com > wrote:
> * w w w .whale.to/vaccines/safer.html
>
> the 200 year old lie.
>
> Eg the MMR is safe lie * w w w .whale.to/vaccine/mmr2.htmlthat they trot
> out most days.


Vaccines are "safer" than not vaccinating.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie


"Myrl" <wisgroup_leader@yahoo . com > wrote in message
news:1192802783.224228.273480@v29g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
> On Oct 18, 10:20 pm, "JOHN" <j...@nospam . com > wrote:
>> * w w w .whale.to/vaccines/safer.html
>>
>> the 200 year old lie.
>>
>> Eg the MMR is safe lie * w w w .whale.to/vaccine/mmr2.htmlthat they trot
>> out most days.
>
>
> Vaccines are "safer" than not vaccinating.
>

that's the vaccines are effective lie
* w w w .whale.to/a/lie_effective.html

and the Disease risk lie * w w w .whale.to/v/ploy.html

not to mention the vitamin C conspiracy
* w w w .whale.to/a/vit_c_cons.html

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

In article <2smdnTVr0ZewS4XanZ2dnUVZ8rednZ2d@bt . com >,
JOHN <john@nospam . com > wrote:
>
>"Myrl" <wisgroup_leader@yahoo . com > wrote in message
>news:1192802783.224228.273480@v29g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>> On Oct 18, 10:20 pm, "JOHN" <j...@nospam . com > wrote:
>>> * w w w .whale.to/vaccines/safer.html
>>>
>>> the 200 year old lie.
>>>
>>> Eg the MMR is safe lie * w w w .whale.to/vaccine/mmr2.htmlthat they trot
>>> out most days.
>>
>>
>> Vaccines are "safer" than not vaccinating.
>>
>
>that's the vaccines are effective lie
> * w w w .whale.to/a/lie_effective.html
>
>and the Disease risk lie * w w w .whale.to/v/ploy.html
>
>not to mention the vitamin C conspiracy
> * w w w .whale.to/a/vit_c_cons.html

The usual tap-dancing from whale.to. They try to claim vaccines don't
work, but they carefully avoid mentioning that measles, mumps, etc are
now virtually unknown in countries where vaccination is widespread.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy . net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Saddam Hussein was a bad man, connected with some incredibly dangerous
people: Cheney, Rumsfeld, George Galloway." -- Marcus Brigstocke

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

On Oct 19, 1:20 am, "JOHN" <j...@nospam . com > wrote:
> * w w w .whale.to/vaccines/safer.html
>
> the 200 year old lie.
>
> Eg the MMR is safe lie * w w w .whale.to/vaccine/mmr2.htmlthat they trot
> out most days.

In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
be defined as "not too many sicken or die."

Since most of the adverse reactions are denied or ignored, the
profits continue comming in and the pediatrician's ( the major group
of pus squirters ) image goes untarnished.

Works for them. How about you? Does anybody give a tinker's dam?

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly
Not a member of the church of modern medicine

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie


<drceephd@insightbb . com > wrote in message
news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...

>
> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>


Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

JOHN wrote:
> <drceephd@insightbb . com > wrote in message
> news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>
>> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
>> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>>
>
>
> Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.
>
>
Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
knows what he is talking about. You don't.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

On Oct 20, 9:50 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel . com > wrote:
> JOHN wrote:
> > <drcee...@insightbb . com > wrote in message
> >news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>
> >> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
> >> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>
> > Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.
>
> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
> knows what he is talking about. You don't.

To the Marked Pervert:

Let's be totally accurate then. Safe is " the proposed, but unproven,
benefits outweigh the known, and often fatal, risks."

DrCee
Not a member of the medical monopoly
NOt a member of the church of modern medicine

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

drceephd@insightbb . com wrote:
> On Oct 20, 9:50 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel . com > wrote:
>> JOHN wrote:
>>> <drcee...@insightbb . com > wrote in message
>>> news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>>>> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
>>>> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>>> Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.
>> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
>> knows what he is talking about. You don't.
>
> To the Marked Pervert:
>
> Let's be totally accurate then. Safe is " the proposed, but unproven,
> benefits outweigh the known, and often fatal, risks."

Wrong asswipe.

The benefits of vaccinations are well documented. The risks of the
diseases they prevent are well documented.

The fact that your brain transplant was rejected should not confuse you
into believing that you can think. There is no evidence to support that
conclusion. '

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie


<drceephd@insightbb . com > wrote in message
news:1192890423.151042.224260@q5g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
>> knows what he is talking about. You don't.

LOL. he is a proven liar * w w w .whale.to/v/offitt.html and takes money
off vaccine companies.
Maybe you would let him inject 100,000 vaccines into your kid, but you
haven't a clue, as well all know

>
> To the Marked Pervert:

Nice one

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

JOHN wrote:
> <drceephd@insightbb . com > wrote in message
> news:1192890423.151042.224260@q5g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>>> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
>>> knows what he is talking about. You don't.
>
> LOL. he is a proven liar * w w w .whale.to/v/offitt.html and takes money
> off vaccine companies.
> Maybe you would let him inject 100,000 vaccines into your kid, but you
> haven't a clue, as well all know
>
>> To the Marked Pervert:
>
> Nice one
>
>
>
I thought you opposed ad hominems.

Hypocrite.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

In article <1192890423.151042.224260@q5g2000prf.googlegroups . com >,
<drceephd@insightbb . com > wrote:
>On Oct 20, 9:50 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel . com > wrote:
>> JOHN wrote:
>> > <drcee...@insightbb . com > wrote in message
>> >news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>>
>> >> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
>> >> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>>
>> > Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.
>>
>> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
>> knows what he is talking about. You don't.
>
>To the Marked Pervert:
>
>Let's be totally accurate then. Safe is " the proposed, but unproven,
>benefits outweigh the known, and often fatal, risks."

The fact that you'd refer to the risks as "often fatal" merely shows
what an imbecile you are.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy . net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"Saddam Hussein was a bad man, connected with some incredibly dangerous
people: Cheney, Rumsfeld, George Galloway." -- Marcus Brigstocke

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
> knows what he is talking about. You don't.


Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the Pharmecutical
companies that
is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!! Can we say
"Conflict of Interest"!


On Oct 20, 9:50 am, Mark Probert <markprob...@lumbercartel . com > wrote:
> JOHN wrote:
> > <drcee...@insightbb . com > wrote in message
> >news:1192822093.336220.101210@i38g2000prf.googlegroups . com ...
>
> >> In medical speak, the language of the medical monopoly, "safe" should
> >> be defined as "not too many sicken or die."
>
> > Offit actually says safe is 'benefits outweigh risks'. Talk about Newspeak.
>
> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
> knows what he is talking about. You don't.

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie


"Kevysmom" <bluebunny8@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:1192900949.618048.242430@v29g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
>> knows what he is talking about. You don't.
>
>
> Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the Pharmecutical
> companies that
> is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!! Can we say
> "Conflict of Interest"!

Conflict of Interest doesn't exist in the world of "evidence-based
medicine". Because it's the magical world at the end of a Yellow Brick
Road -- where any sort of toxic sludge turns to gold!

Best,

Yuri.

Yuri Kuchinsky -- * w w w .globalserve . net /~yuku

"Modern medicine" may well be defined as "the experimental study of what
happens when poisonous chemicals are placed into malnourished human
bodies." -- A. Saul, Contributing Editor, Journal of Orthomolecular
Medicine -- * w w w .orthomed.org

Re: The 'Vaccines are safe' lie

> Conflict of Interest doesn't exist in the world of "evidence-based
> medicine". Because it's the magical world at the end of a Yellow Brick
> Road -- where any sort of toxic sludge turns to gold!
>
> Best,
>
> Yuri.
>
> Yuri Kuchinsky -- * w w w .globalserve . net /~yuku


You have a wonderful gift with words!!! I really enjoyed reading
somethings on your web page!

Thank You Yuri!


On Oct 20, 2:59 pm, "Yuri Kuchinsky" <y...@trends.ca> wrote:
> "Kevysmom" <bluebun...@gmail . com > wrote in message
>
> news:1192900949.618048.242430@v29g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>
> >> Paul Offitt is way more well informed that you are mis-informed. He
> >> knows what he is talking about. You don't.
>
> > Isnt Paul OFF His rocker paid by Merck....One of the Pharmecutical
> > companies that
> > is being SUED for injecting Mercury into Infants!!! Can we say
> > "Conflict of Interest"!
>
> Conflict of Interest doesn't exist in the world of "evidence-based
> medicine". Because it's the magical world at the end of a Yellow Brick
> Road -- where any sort of toxic sludge turns to gold!
>
> Best,
>
> Yuri.
>
> Yuri Kuchinsky -- * w w w .globalserve . net /~yuku
>
> "Modern medicine" may well be defined as "the experimental study of what
> happens when poisonous chemicals are placed into malnourished human
> bodies." -- A. Saul, Contributing Editor, Journal of Orthomolecular
> Medicine -- * w w w .orthomed.org