On Jun 23, 4:35 pm, "albert.mi...@googlemail . com "
<albert.mi...@googlemail . com > wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering doing a PhD in medical physics, and I have a few
> questions:
>
> I would like to become a clinical medical physicist who divides his
> time between clinical duties and research. I think it would be a nice
> mix, rather than simply focusing on one, and getting bored with it.
> I'm also attracted by the salary/stability of a clinical medical
> physicist.
>
> I was wondering how is the time divided between clinical duties and
> research for such a position? Does it vary widely, or is there some
> typical division (at a big hospital in Canada).
>
> My grad degree was in engineering physics, where i focused on applied
> magnetics. I now work for a non-destructive testing company where my
> work involves applied magnetics mostly, and i took a graduate medical
> physics survey course course where i did a research project on MRI
> artifacts.
> Therefore I would probably like to do research/work with diagnostic
> imaging
> and MRI in particular. However when I look at the medical physics
> curiculums in
> clinical med phys programs, they all seem to focus on radiation
> theraphy, with minimal imaging courses. Most of the jobs seem to be
> focused on radiaiton therapy also. Why is this so, I imagine imaging
> is done just as often as radiaiton therapy (if not more so), so I
> guess fewer people are just needed for it?
>
> Additionally if I were to go into radiation theraphy what would the
> clinical duties be like, from what I've read it sounds like a lot of
> calibration work -- doesn't this get a bit dull after a while?
>
> All these questions apply to the situation in Canada, and the work
> questions are regarding working in a large hospital (although I
> suspect
> the situation is fairly similar in the US).
>
> Thanks.
Since you also posted on science.medical.imaging group, I posted a
reply there:
* groups.google . com /group/medicalimagingscience/browse_thread/thread/bc81908ea5c7cf76