Why So Few Posts Here?

There seem to be some smart, knowledgeable folks here.

So, why are there so few posts?

The newsgroup seems to be dead as a door-nail.

DSH

D. Spencer Hines wrote:
> There seem to be some smart, knowledgeable folks here.
>
> So, why are there so few posts?
>
> The newsgroup seems to be dead as a door-nail.
>
> DSH
>
>

Usenet is a pretty dead place as it is, other than spam, ripped off
music/movies/software, and porn. There are a lot of ISP's that don't
even provide usenet access any more, so unless you had a reason to want
it you'd never even know it existed.

I try to answer any nuclear medicine questions that come along.

Thankfully this newsgroup hasn't been "sporged" to death.

Andrew

Yes, I agree...

You do an excellent job of answering questions and providing intelligent
responses.

So do several others...

But there seems to be no tradition of a vigorous debate on important issues
where there may be alternate explanations and even disagreements.

DSH

"Andrew Kerr" <apkerr@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:CaKUj.75502$612.27986@read1.cgocable.net...

> D. Spencer Hines wrote:

>> There seem to be some smart, knowledgeable folks here.
>>
>> So, why are there so few posts?
>>
>> The newsgroup seems to be dead as a door-nail.
>>
>> DSH
>>
>
> Usenet is a pretty dead place as it is, other than spam, ripped off
> music/movies/software, and porn. There are a lot of ISP's that don't even
> provide usenet access any more, so unless you had a reason to want it
> you'd never even know it existed.
>
> I try to answer any nuclear medicine questions that come along.
>
> Thankfully this newsgroup hasn't been "sporged" to death.
>
> Andrew