I had a Total Hip Replacement in March 2007. Recovery went extremely well
for the first few weeks, then the hip 'locked'. I managed to shove it back,
but it happened several times again. X-rays showed the hip to remain in
proper position.
Also after the first month, I experienced a grinding in the hip. It was
temporary, but it left inflamation and pain.
Nothing has gone right since. No matter how much physical therapy and
exercise I have done, the pain and disfunction has gotten progressively
worse. I am now back to walking with a cane and cannot go up stairs. Latest
x-rays show that the hip has loosened and that I will need revision surgery.
I've read that revisions are much more serious and less successful than the
original replacement. Although the original surgeon has done hundreds of
successful replacement surgeries, mine will be his first revision.
The Stryker Hemispherical Cup that was used in the original replacement was
recalled in January, 2008.
Should I allow the same surgeon to do the revision? What can I do to be sure
that I have enough evidence to prove whether or not the failure is a result
of the problems that resulted in the recall?