Celebrity-Babies

Celebrity-Babies

I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?

http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /images/2008/05/08/torispelling6000_cbb.jpg

Is there a shortage of upcoming stars??

I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.

Are they StarBabyMakers???


The Starmaker

Re: Celebrity-Babies

Once Upon A Time,
The Starmaker wrote:

>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?

From fucking, would be my guess.



**
Captain Infinity

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:34:56 GMT, Captain Infinity
<Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:

>Once Upon A Time,
>The Starmaker wrote:
>
>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>
>From fucking, would be my guess.
>


That was a very bad guess.


I'm talking about they seem to be having celebrity babies all at the
same time.

Re: Celebrity-Babies

Once Upon A Time,
The Starmaker wrote:

>On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:34:56 GMT, Captain Infinity
><Infinity@captaininfinity.us> wrote:
>
>>Once Upon A Time,
>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>
>>From fucking, would be my guess.
>
>That was a very bad guess.

Yours was a very poorly phrased question.

>I'm talking about they seem to be having celebrity babies all at the
>same time.

Then you should have said what you meant the first time.



**
Captain Infinity

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On May 11, 10:34 pm, Captain Infinity <Infin...@captaininfinity.us>
wrote:
> Once Upon A Time,
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>
> From fucking, would be my guess.
>
> **
> Captain Infinity

You really think that's how The Ooze got his robot baby?

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On May 11, 10:07 pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix,net com,com > wrote:
> I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>
> http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /images/2008/05/08/torispelling6000 cb...
>
> Is there a shortage of upcoming stars??
>
> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>
> Are they StarBabyMakers???
>
> The Starmaker

Go take your fucking spam shitty blog and go shove it up your baby-
making ass. :-)

Here's a comment I know won't approve, since you go the blowing-liquid-
sunshine-up-our-asses route a la 'Entertainment Tonight'/'The Insider'
and People and Us Weekly magazines.

Hey, Jod, where's the crystal meth, meth head???? I thought your cop
hubby left your sorry ass when he discovered you were doing meth until
your looks ("meth mouth"!) started showing otherwise. lol Man, he must
be one dumb as dirt cop not to catch on sooner. haha Like that idiot
cop Lucy Camden married on '7th Heaven'. God, what a dip!
http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /2008/05/jodie-sweetin-a.html

Also, Christina Aguilera. is a sick mutilator who called a permanent
sexual assault on her son's genitals (her son's bris) a "peaceful and
beautiful thing" and had the nerve to have inflated condoms as
balloons for the "party". How incredibly vain and tacky. Should have
gone to JewsAgainstCircumcision.org first, I guess.

Annoying Gwen Stefanni while actually a decent mother, trots her son
Kingston out for carefully staged beautifully executed photo-ops left
right and center. http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /2008/05/stefani-rossd-1.html
I guess this is another comment you wouldn't approve on your little
celebspawn website, eh?

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:36:29 -0700 (PDT), Taylor
<lukebenward@gmail,com > wrote:

>On May 11, 10:07 pm, The Starmaker <starma...@ix,net com,com > wrote:
>> I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>
>> http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /images/2008/05/08/torispelling6000 cb...
>>
>> Is there a shortage of upcoming stars??
>>
>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>
>> Are they StarBabyMakers???
>>
>> The Starmaker
>
>Go take your fucking spam shitty blog and go shove it up your baby-
>making ass. :-)

I posted a photo, not a blog.


>
>Here's a comment I know won't approve, since you go the blowing-liquid-
>sunshine-up-our-asses route a la 'Entertainment Tonight'/'The Insider'
>and People and Us Weekly magazines.

I haven't seen any of those shows or magazine.

>
>Hey, Jod, where's the crystal meth, meth head???? I thought your cop
>hubby left your sorry ass when he discovered you were doing meth until
>your looks ("meth mouth"!) started showing otherwise. lol Man, he must
>be one dumb as dirt cop not to catch on sooner. haha Like that idiot
>cop Lucy Camden married on '7th Heaven'. God, what a dip!
> http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /2008/05/jodie-sweetin-a.html
>
>Also, Christina Aguilera. is a sick mutilator who called a permanent
>sexual assault on her son's genitals (her son's bris) a "peaceful and
>beautiful thing" and had the nerve to have inflated condoms as
>balloons for the "party". How incredibly vain and tacky. Should have
>gone to JewsAgainstCircumcision.org first, I guess.
>
>Annoying Gwen Stefanni while actually a decent mother, trots her son
>Kingston out for carefully staged beautifully executed photo-ops left
>right and center. http :// www .celebrity-babies,com /2008/05/stefani-rossd-1.html
>I guess this is another comment you wouldn't approve on your little
>celebspawn website, eh?

Re: Celebrity-Babies


"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>

Because they are 20-40 years old?

> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>

I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support this
sloppy statement.

I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
<masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:

>
>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>
>
>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>
>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>
>
>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support this
>sloppy statement.

Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
"sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
than stars that exist.
>
>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.

"horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
tiny stars.

How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
know who her father is.


The Starmaker

Re: Celebrity-Babies


"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
news:h5rg249b6dkvadv8plqnies8fg7a7nqkt7@4ax,com ...
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>>
>>
>>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>>
>>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>>
>>
>>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support
>>this
>>sloppy statement.
>
> Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
> "sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
> Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
> that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
> stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
> children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
> Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
> than stars that exist.
>>
>>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.
>
> "horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
> parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
> tiny stars.
>
> How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
> know who her father is.
>
>

In other words, you can blow smoke in every direction, but your claim is so
lame that you can't even attempt to back it up.

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:16:08 -0400, "Mason Barge"
<masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:

>
>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>news:h5rg249b6dkvadv8plqnies8fg7a7nqkt7@4ax,com ...
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
>> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>>>
>>>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support
>>>this
>>>sloppy statement.
>>
>> Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
>> "sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
>> Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
>> that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
>> stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
>> children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
>> Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
>> than stars that exist.
>>>
>>>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>>>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.
>>
>> "horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
>> parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
>> tiny stars.
>>
>> How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
>> know who her father is.
>>
>>
>
>In other words, you can blow smoke in every direction, but your claim is so
>lame that you can't even attempt to back it up.

No, I'm going to go one by one. Just in case there is any dispute what
is a star. Angelina Jolie father is star Jon Voight.

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:48:43 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote:

>On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:16:08 -0400, "Mason Barge"
><masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>news:h5rg249b6dkvadv8plqnies8fg7a7nqkt7@4ax,com ...
>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
>>> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>>>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>>>>
>>>>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support
>>>>this
>>>>sloppy statement.
>>>
>>> Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
>>> "sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
>>> Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
>>> that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
>>> stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
>>> children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
>>> Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
>>> than stars that exist.
>>>>
>>>>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>>>>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.
>>>
>>> "horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
>>> parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
>>> tiny stars.
>>>
>>> How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
>>> know who her father is.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>In other words, you can blow smoke in every direction, but your claim is so
>>lame that you can't even attempt to back it up.
>
>No, I'm going to go one by one. Just in case there is any dispute what
>is a star. Angelina Jolie father is star Jon Voight.

Here is the list:

2006
Tom Hanks
Tom Cruise
Jim Carrey
George Clooney
Russell Crowe
Johnny Depp
Nicole Kidman
Jude Law
Brad Pitt
Julia Roberts [2]


Hollywood Reporter's "Star Power" rating, which is based on a survey
of studio executives:

TOM CRUISE 100.00
TOM HANKS 100.00
JULIA ROBERTS 100.00
MEL GIBSON 98.68
JIM CARREY 98.46
GEORGE CLOONEY 95.18
RUSSELL CROWE 94.74
HARRISON FORD 94.74
BRUCE WILLIS 94.30
BRAD PITT 92.98
NICOLAS CAGE 91.23
LEONARDO DICAPRIO 91.01
WILL SMITH 89.91
DENZEL WASHINGTON 89.04
SANDRA BULLOCK 87.28
ROBERT DE NIRO 87.17
JACKIE CHAN 86.84
JACK NICHOLSON 86.84
SEAN CONNERY 86.40
EDDIE MURPHY 86.40
CAMERON DIAZ 84.87
MICHAEL DOUGLAS 84.87
NICOLE KIDMAN 84.65
CLINT EASTWOOD 83.85
MEG RYAN 83.77
MIKE MYERS 83.55
AL PACINO 82.89
KEANU REEVES 82.02
JODIE FOSTER 81.80
JOHN TRAVOLTA 81.80
ANTHONY HOPKINS 81.58
ADAM SANDLER 80.70
BEN AFFLECK 80.48
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER 79.61
KEVIN SPACEY 79.61
ANGELINA JOLIE 79.39
JOHNNY DEPP 77.19
GWYNETH PALTROW 76.97
MATT DAMON 76.10
ROBIN WILLIAMS 75.88
ROBERT REDFORD 75.66
RICHARD GERE 75.22
MICHELLE PFEIFFER 75.00
DREW BARRYMORE 74.78
CATHERINE ZETA-JONES 74.78
JENNIFER LOPEZ 73.68
PIERCE BROSNAN 73.67
KEVIN COSTNER 72.81
DUSTIN HOFFMAN 72.81
HUGH GRANT 72.15
HELEN HUNT 71.88
ANTONIO BANDERAS 71.49
MARK WAHLBERG 71.49
SAMUEL L. JACKSON 69.96
RENEE ZELLWEGER 69.96
MORGAN FREEMAN 69.30
BRENDAN FRASER 69.08
EDWARD NORTON 69.08
BEN STILLER 68.64
GENE HACKMAN 68.30
TOMMY LEE JONES 68.14
CATE BLANCHETT 66.59
ASHLEY JUDD 66.01
SEAN PENN 66.01
REESE WITHERSPOON 66.01
WINONA RYDER 65.79
MERYL STREEP 65.79
JOHN CUSACK 65.35
BARBRA STREISAND 65.13
WESLEY SNIPES 64.91
DANNY DEVITO 64.69
CHRIS TUCKER 63.60
WARREN BEATTY 63.39
BILLY CRYSTAL 63.38
SYLVESTER STALLONE 63.38
BENICIO DEL TORO 62.94
WOODY ALLEN 62.83
PAUL NEWMAN 62.72
PENELOPE CRUZ 62.28
MADONNA 61.95
JUDE LAW 61.84
MARTIN LAWRENCE 61.84
TIM ALLEN 61.28
EWAN MCGREGOR 60.96
ANNETTE BENING 60.53
JULIANNE MOORE 59.65
JENNIFER ANISTON 59.43
DANIEL DAY-LEWIS 59.43
UMA THURMAN 59.43
STEVE MARTIN 59.21
SHARON STONE 59.21
CHRIS ROCK 58.99
CHOW YUN-FAT 58.99
SUSAN SARANDON 58.77
RALPH FIENNES 58.63
KURT RUSSELL 58.49
BILLY BOB THORNTON 58.33
KATE WINSLET 58.33
MARLON BRANDO 58.11
GLENN CLOSE 58.11
MATTHEW MCCONAUGHEY 57.89
TIM ROBBINS 57.89
CHARLIZE THERON 57.89
HEATH LEDGER 57.68
JET LI 57.68
JOHN MALKOVICH 57.68
ROBERTO BENIGNI 57.30
JEFF BRIDGES 57.02
CUBA GOODING JR. 57.02
BILL MURRAY 56.80
KIRSTEN DUNST 56.58
ED HARRIS 56.58
ROBERT DUVALL 56.36
SIGOURNEY WEAVER 55.92
JULIETTE BINOCHE 55.70
MICHAEL CAINE 55.70
KEVIN KLINE 55.70
ALEC BALDWIN 55.04
MICHAEL J. FOX 54.82
HALEY JOEL OSMENT 54.82
JOAQUIN PHOENIX 54.65
KATE HUDSON 54.61
RENE RUSSO 54.42
DEMI MOORE 54.39
HELENA BONHAM CARTER 54.17
VIN DIESEL 54.17
GOLDIE HAWN 54.17
CLAIRE DANES 53.95
LIAM NEESON 53.95
KIM BASINGER 53.29
HEATHER GRAHAM 53.07
HUGH JACKMAN 53.07
ETHAN HAWKE 52.90
WOODY HARRELSON 52.85
LAURENCE FISHBURNE 52.63
KEVIN BACON 52.41
JENNIFER LOVE HEWITT 51.97
TOBEY MAGUIRE 51.97
HOLLY HUNTER 51.54
VAL KILMER 51.54
WHOOPI GOLDBERG 51.10
EMMA THOMPSON 51.10
KENNETH BRANAGH 50.88
ROBERT DOWNEY JR. 50.88
DAVID DUCHOVNY 50.88
SALMA HAYEK 50.88
BRITNEY SPEARS 50.88
MATTHEW BRODERICK 50.44
GERARD DEPARDIEU 50.44

Re: Celebrity-Babies


"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
news:544h24ps0scpj866pekdk3j8hnhp4an6oh@4ax,com ...
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:16:08 -0400, "Mason Barge"
> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>news:h5rg249b6dkvadv8plqnies8fg7a7nqkt7@4ax,com ...
>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
>>> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>>>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>>>>
>>>>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support
>>>>this
>>>>sloppy statement.
>>>
>>> Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
>>> "sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
>>> Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
>>> that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
>>> stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
>>> children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
>>> Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
>>> than stars that exist.
>>>>
>>>>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>>>>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.
>>>
>>> "horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
>>> parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
>>> tiny stars.
>>>
>>> How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
>>> know who her father is.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>In other words, you can blow smoke in every direction, but your claim is
>>so
>>lame that you can't even attempt to back it up.
>
> No, I'm going to go one by one. Just in case there is any dispute what
> is a star. Angelina Jolie father is star Jon Voight.
>

Whatever. Will Smith, Matthew McCoughnahey (sp?), Vince Vaughn, Julia
Roberts, Reese Witherspoon, Halle Berry, Denzel Washington, Amy Adams,
Leonardo DiCaprio, Kate Winslet, Johnny Depp, Sarah M. Geller, Katherine
Heigl, Ellen Page, Jennifer Garner, Natalie Portman, Courtenay Cox, Emile
Hirsch, Ashton Kutcher, Jude Law, Kristin Bell, Edward Norton, Katie Holmes,
Matt Damon, Emma Watson, Christina Ricci, blah blah blah.

I'll do a hundred more except I have little doubt you'll change the rules
everytime you paint yourself into a corner.

Re: Celebrity-Babies

There isn't a shortage of baby stars...
not with todays reverting to being babies
http :// www .starvsstar.tv/nicole-richie-baby.html

Re: Celebrity-Babies

On Mon, 12 May 2008 11:48:43 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote:

>On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:16:08 -0400, "Mason Barge"
><masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>
>>
>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>news:h5rg249b6dkvadv8plqnies8fg7a7nqkt7@4ax,com ...
>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:20:35 -0400, "Mason Barge"
>>> <masonbarge@comcast,net > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"The Starmaker" <starmaker@ix,net com,com > wrote in message
>>>>news:q79f24df072nj5cifa6ecnh33hlonke8e8@4ax,com ...
>>>>>I notice that a lot of celebrities are having babies, why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Because they are 20-40 years old?
>>>>
>>>>> I do notice that the majority of "todays stars" are children of stars.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I think you're full of it. Prove it. I'd want to see facts to support
>>>>this
>>>>sloppy statement.
>>>
>>> Sloppy statement? I never heard that term used before. What does
>>> "sloppy statement" mean? Do I have to start listing all the stars?
>>> Count how many are stars, then add up all the ones that have parents
>>> that are stars to show the ratio between the children of stars and
>>> stars without star parents, just to show you that the majority are
>>> children of stars? That's a lot of work. First I would have to define
>>> Stars. So, I mean Stars that have Star Power. That's a smaller list
>>> than stars that exist.
>>>>
>>>>I can think of a handful of young stars who have celebrity parents. A
>>>>statistical difference, probably. A "majority" -- horse puckey.
>>>
>>> "horsey puckey"? What country are you from, Olkahoma? I said star
>>> parents, not celebrity parents. I'm talking about major stars, not
>>> tiny stars.
>>>
>>> How about Angelina Jolie? She's a major star. She has star power. You
>>> know who her father is.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>In other words, you can blow smoke in every direction, but your claim is so
>>lame that you can't even attempt to back it up.
>
>No, I'm going to go one by one. Just in case there is any dispute what
>is a star. Angelina Jolie father is star Jon Voight.

I'm a little confused with Nicolas Cage, I cannot tell who he is
from... is the nephew of director Francis Ford Coppola and actress
Talia Shire, as well as the cousin of director Sofia Coppola and
actors Robert Carmine and Jason Schwartzman. Cage's two brothers are
Christopher Coppola, a director, and Marc "The Cope" Coppola, a New
York radio personality.


but i'm just going down the first ten and they are mostly already kids
from show biz parents!

and i got over a 100 to go...

I'm begining to think everybody is related to somebody in show biz.

What do they say, Hollywood is a incestuous community.

They only have sex with show biz people.