Re: Insulating a roof with no crawl spaceOn May 9, 10:57=A0am, Kompu Kid <deg...@hotmail . com > wrote:
> On May 8, 5:29=A0pm, ransley <Mark_Rans...@yahoo . com > wrote:
>
> > On May 8, 4:03=A0pm, Kompu Kid <deg...@hotmail . com > wrote:
>
> > > While searching for insulation on the net I found a real good page:
>
> > > * w w w .eere.energy.gov/consumer/your_home/insulation_airsealing/i..=
.
>
> > > Deguza
>
> > That is a good site, bubble wrap -reflextic? See if there is an
> > independant lab, a real one, that verified their claims on R value, I
> > dont believe them. The question is what Zone are you in and what is
> > the optimal for your zone, I put in R100, it sank to R 70 but it goes
> > from -20f to 100f where I am.w w w .energystar.govmightgive you a
> > starting point as to what you need. I dont know you weather but I
> > thought it was a mild area
>
> Thanks for the link, it has much better information.
>
> Yes, where I am the weather is relatively mild. However, builders
> 1950's did absolutely nothing to insulate the house.
>
> I am the type of guy who can stand cold (my room temp is around 65 to
> 68 during the winter), but cannot take any heat --literally, not
> figuratively :)
>
> When temperatures rise during the summer, interior in an older
> uninsulated house around here goes to 80 to 85. (When I cook or use my
> computer, it is more like 85.) This really bothers me. I should add
> here that the home does not have an airconditioner.
>
> So my goal is to lower the interior temperature during the summer as
> much as possible.
>
> Deguza
Bubble wrap is not recommended as the R-vale is over stated and needs
an air gap to get the radiant barrier to work. With lower
temperatures the radiant transfer is substantial. The demonstration
they show with the infrared lamps is not realistic. The temperature
of the heat lamp is over 300 deg F (that is as high as the thermometer
I have will go). Since radiation is expediential as the temperature
increases the demonstration is not real.
As for foam, one needs to check with their building code as to what is
allowed per the fire code.
I would do nothing less than 2=94 of foam, would prefer 4=94 or more. As
the years go on the cost of energy is only likely to go up. I am of
the mind set that we should be taking societal benefits into account
and not just the immediate dollar savings. If you find a good source
for societal cost please let me know. Since your goal is comfort I=92d
highly recommend the 4=94 if it can be installed.
Regardless of the foam being on the top or bottom of the roof deck it
will raise the roof temperature (the energy absorbed from the sun has
to go somewhere).
Andy