Re: Another interesting articleOn Jul 16, 8:14 pm, sprsso <spr...@yahoo . com > wrote:
> The reason I post these articles is primarily to share some of the
> industry mail I get and to watch the reactions posted by regulars
> here. A large part of what I have been doing for the last couple of
> years has been helping coffee businesses at varying levels get
> started. A large part of that is watching market trends, and the
> successes and failures of those that shape the market.
> I'm finding a lot of floundering around in the industry right now, and
> some of this is illustrated by $bux grasping at seemingly random
> straws to correct their recent downturns.
> The last batches of articles also seem to be struggling with
> misconceptions and misinformation, and seem to be coming from less
> than positive standpoints as regards $bux.
> I personally don't think the industry as a whole is benefitting by the
> focus on failure, but I guess any publicity is good. Right?....al
>
> * w w w .washingtonpost . com /wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/13/AR200...
Sentence in article:
"To be sure, Roberts's shop and other independents are not solely
responsible for Starbucks' troubles, which many analysts are blaming
on extreme over-expansion."
Spouse was in CT the past few days and had a $bux at a shop in
Branford, CT and said it was possibly the best $bux he'd ever had.
The next day in Greenwich, CT he said he had possibly the worse $bux
he had ever had; again Quadruple shot/Americano in a tall cup.
Extreme over-expansion, perhaps, but there is only one $bux in each of
the towns, AFAIK.
Both of these shops have been there long enough to do the training
exercise.
Dee Dee