Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
Naked
4.25x54
W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
Full bodied
$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
hours :)
4 matchsticks out of 5.
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
Naked
4.25x54
W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
Full bodied
$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
hours :)
4 matchsticks out of 5.
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
On Apr 9, 9:58 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
wrote:
> Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> Naked
> 4.25x54
> W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> Full bodied
> $76/22 atw w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
> Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
> but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
> continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
> hours :)
>
> 4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> --
> Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
> I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
> unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
The sad thing is you have no idea how pathetic you look trying to make
ASC look viable. I do understand why you try so hard. You've been
booted from all the others and now you're close to ruining ASC. If the
M&M's would just back-off for a few months I bet this place would come
back to life.
On Apr 9, 9:58 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
wrote:
> Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> Naked
> 4.25x54
> W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> Full bodied
> $76/22 atw w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
> Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
> but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
> continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
> hours :)
>
> 4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> --
> Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
> I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
> unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
The sad thing is you have no idea how pathetic you look trying to make
ASC look viable. I do understand why you try so hard. You've been
booted from all the others and now you're close to ruining ASC. If the
M&M's would just back-off for a few months I bet this place would come
back to life.
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in message
news:Misc-63AF0B.07585709042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net ...
> Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> Naked
> 4.25x54
> W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> Full bodied
> $76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
Thanks for the review!
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in message
news:Misc-63AF0B.07585709042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net ...
> Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> Naked
> 4.25x54
> W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> Full bodied
> $76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
Thanks for the review!
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>Naked
>4.25x54
>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>Full bodied
>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>hours :)
>
>4 matchsticks out of 5.
Thanks for the review!
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>Naked
>4.25x54
>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>Full bodied
>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>hours :)
>
>4 matchsticks out of 5.
Thanks for the review!
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in message
news:m11qv31pbkfbuv7b2bguj4d6dhdpc8nf0h@4ax . com ...
> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>
>>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>>Naked
>>4.25x54
>>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>>Full bodied
>>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>>
>>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>>hours :)
>>
>>4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> Thanks for the review!
There's an echo...echo...echoo...in here...in here...in here.
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in message
news:m11qv31pbkfbuv7b2bguj4d6dhdpc8nf0h@4ax . com ...
> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>
>>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>>Naked
>>4.25x54
>>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>>Full bodied
>>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>>
>>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>>hours :)
>>
>>4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> Thanks for the review!
There's an echo...echo...echoo...in here...in here...in here.
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@cox . net > wrote:
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in message
>news:m11qv31pbkfbuv7b2bguj4d6dhdpc8nf0h@4ax . com ...
>> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>>
>>>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>>>Naked
>>>4.25x54
>>>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>>>Full bodied
>>>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>>>
>>>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>>>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>>>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>>>hours :)
>>>
>>>4 matchsticks out of 5.
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>
>There's an echo...echo...echoo...in here...in here...in here.
>
I thought that was just in my head.
"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@cox . net > wrote:
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in message
>news:m11qv31pbkfbuv7b2bguj4d6dhdpc8nf0h@4ax . com ...
>> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>>
>>>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>>>Naked
>>>4.25x54
>>>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>>>Full bodied
>>>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>>>
>>>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>>>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>>>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>>>hours :)
>>>
>>>4 matchsticks out of 5.
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>
>There's an echo...echo...echoo...in here...in here...in here.
>
I thought that was just in my head.
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:58:58 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>Naked
>4.25x54
>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>Full bodied
>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>hours :)
>
>4 matchsticks out of 5.
It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
CigarBaron
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:58:58 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
>Naked
>4.25x54
>W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
>Full bodied
>$76/22 at w w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
>Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
>but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
>continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
>hours :)
>
>4 matchsticks out of 5.
It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
CigarBaron
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
In article <iue104tuk4fteqm33cq52u38n2r926l6hj@4ax . com >,
Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote:
> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
Most cigars are, IMO... :)
Misc "or a good, stout robusto, at a minimum..."
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <iue104tuk4fteqm33cq52u38n2r926l6hj@4ax . com >,
Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote:
> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
Most cigars are, IMO... :)
Misc "or a good, stout robusto, at a minimum..."
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:53 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>In article <iue104tuk4fteqm33cq52u38n2r926l6hj@4ax . com >,
> Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote:
>
>> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
>
>Most cigars are, IMO... :)
>
>
Chuchill is my favorite size.
CigarBaron
(sports a party short)
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:56:53 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
<Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>In article <iue104tuk4fteqm33cq52u38n2r926l6hj@4ax . com >,
> Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote:
>
>> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
>
>Most cigars are, IMO... :)
>
>
Chuchill is my favorite size.
CigarBaron
(sports a party short)
Re: REVIEW: (mini) Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
On Apr 12, 8:41 am, Marc Schneiderman <garba...@telerama . com > wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:58:58 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
>
> <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
> >Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> >Naked
> >4.25x54
> >W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> >Full bodied
> >$76/22 atw w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
> >Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
> >but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
> >continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
> >hours :)
>
> >4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
> CigarBaron
The evidence mounts. You're going down hard!
On Apr 12, 8:41 am, Marc Schneiderman <garba...@telerama . com > wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:58:58 GMT, Miss Elaine Eos
>
> <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
> >Saint Louis Rey Serie G Short Robusto
> >Naked
> >4.25x54
> >W: CTBL B: CTBL F: NIC
> >Full bodied
> >$76/22 atw w w .jrcigars . com (nada)
>
> >Had one of these last night. Was mildly annoyed at its short length,
> >but it was one of those nice, tasty cigars that, after I finished, I
> >continued to enjoy the smell of its smoke in my moustache for several
> >hours :)
>
> >4 matchsticks out of 5.
>
> It's Cuban namesake is best served in the Churchill size.
> CigarBaron
The evidence mounts. You're going down hard!
