Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to groupPost Subject:
The chickens coming home to roost. HA!
The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
$1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
drinking and addiction.
"The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
said.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
$1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
drinking and addiction.
"The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
said.
http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
In article <b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com>,
Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote:
> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>
> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>
> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
The key is to buy your beer in kegs.
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote:
> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>
> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>
> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
The key is to buy your beer in kegs.
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
> In article <b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com>,
> Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote:
>
>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>
>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>
>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>
> The key is to buy your beer in kegs.
>
Nah, just make your own. In Washington the components are considered
foodstuffs and therefore not taxed.
Ryan
> In article <b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com>,
> Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote:
>
>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>
>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>
>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>
> The key is to buy your beer in kegs.
>
Nah, just make your own. In Washington the components are considered
foodstuffs and therefore not taxed.
Ryan
Mickey wrote:
> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>
> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>
> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>
> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
> drinking and addiction.
>
> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
> said.
>
> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
Brilliant!
>the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
> drinking and addiction
The putz that came up with this idea will no doubt get re-elected.
> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>
> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>
> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>
> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
> drinking and addiction.
>
> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
> said.
>
> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
Brilliant!
>the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
> drinking and addiction
The putz that came up with this idea will no doubt get re-elected.
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>
> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>
> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>
> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
> drinking and addiction.
>
> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
> said.
>
> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
time you found a psychiatrist.
Paul
"Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>
>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>
>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>>
>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>> drinking and addiction.
>>
>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>> said.
>>
>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>
>
>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>time you found a psychiatrist.
>
>Paul
>
I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>
>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>
>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>>
>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>> drinking and addiction.
>>
>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>> said.
>>
>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>
>
>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>time you found a psychiatrist.
>
>Paul
>
I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>> This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>>time you found a psychiatrist.
>>
>>Paul
>>
>
> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
LOF'nL!
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
news:rfp304t1ufka4i9jv25g4sr1tgs6f1kqp3@4ax.com...
> "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>>
>>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>>
>>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>>>
>>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>>> drinking and addiction.
>>>
>>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>>> said.
>>>
>>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>>
>>
>>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>>arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>>time you found a psychiatrist.
>>
>>Paul
>>
>
> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
I post, therefore I am.
Mike, Mike, Mike. Trolling a cigar group is very bad. And you don't even
drink beer. Frankly I am all for having you committed. You're losing it
dude. Maybe we could take up a collection and establish a trust fund for
your permanent hospitalization. If you do well, we can forgo the
electroshock and the lobotomy.
Paul
"Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>news:rfp304t1ufka4i9jv25g4sr1tgs6f1kqp3@4ax.com...
>> "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>>>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>>>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>>>
>>>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>>>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>>>
>>>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>>>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>>>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>>>>
>>>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>>>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>>>> drinking and addiction.
>>>>
>>>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>>>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>>>> said.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>>>
>>>
>>>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>>>arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>>>time you found a psychiatrist.
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>
>> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>
>I post, therefore I am.
You're putting Descartes before the horse.
>
>Mike, Mike, Mike. Trolling a cigar group is very bad. And you don't even
>drink beer. Frankly I am all for having you committed. You're losing it
>dude. Maybe we could take up a collection and establish a trust fund for
>your permanent hospitalization. If you do well, we can forgo the
>electroshock and the lobotomy.
I'd prefer to skip the lobotomy, but a little ECT can sure liven up
your day. ;-)
>
>Paul
>
>
>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>news:rfp304t1ufka4i9jv25g4sr1tgs6f1kqp3@4ax.com...
>> "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>>>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>>>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>>>
>>>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>>>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>>>
>>>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>>>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>>>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
>>>>
>>>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>>>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>>>> drinking and addiction.
>>>>
>>>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>>>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>>>> said.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>>>
>>>
>>>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>>>arrival. This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>>>time you found a psychiatrist.
>>>
>>>Paul
>>>
>>
>> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>
>I post, therefore I am.
You're putting Descartes before the horse.
>
>Mike, Mike, Mike. Trolling a cigar group is very bad. And you don't even
>drink beer. Frankly I am all for having you committed. You're losing it
>dude. Maybe we could take up a collection and establish a trust fund for
>your permanent hospitalization. If you do well, we can forgo the
>electroshock and the lobotomy.
I'd prefer to skip the lobotomy, but a little ECT can sure liven up
your day. ;-)
>
>Paul
>
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
news:tqq4041b98allkd61so8eac1lrjhme42n7@4ax.com...
>>> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>>
>>I post, therefore I am.
>
> You're putting Descartes before the horse.
Nice Plato on words.
news:tqq4041b98allkd61so8eac1lrjhme42n7@4ax.com...
>>> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
>>
>>I post, therefore I am.
>
> You're putting Descartes before the horse.
Nice Plato on words.
"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
news:rfp304t1ufka4i9jv25g4sr1tgs6f1kqp3@4ax.com...
> "Paul M. Cook" <pmcook@gte.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Mickey" <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds.com> wrote in message
>>news:b74004hd4afo9fdj6ba8flvtnb9ishrp8j@4ax.com...
>>> The buzz-killers following that Nazi playbook straight down the line:
>>>
>>> SACRAMENTO - Joe Six-pack will have to pay a lot more to get his buzz
>>> on if Assemblyman Jim Beall has his way.
>>>
>>> The San Jose Democrat on Thursday proposed raising the beer tax by
>>> $1.80 per six-pack, or 30 cents per can or bottle. The current tax is
>>> 2 cents per can. That's an increase of about 1,500 percent.
Elistist POS, ain't he!
>>>
>>> Beall said the tax would generate $2 billion a year to fund health
>>> care services, crime prevention and programs to prevent underage
>>> drinking and addiction.
>>>
>>> "The people who use alcohol should pay for part of the cost to
>>> society, just like we've accepted that concept with tobacco," Beall
>>> said.
Who is this "society" person? I'd like to meet him/er; I have a roll fo
quarters to repay my dedt to him (I've looked for a receipt, but can't find
it).
>>>
>>> http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_8888028?source=rss
>>
>>
>>You cut out the part where everyone involved said the ideas was dead on
>>arrival.
Democrats: Braindead on arrival.
>> This is clearly just you making your usual trouble. Mike, it is
>>time you found a psychiatrist.
Of course, when the person is Republican, it's quite worthy of a couple
hours airtime on the MSM.
BTW, has the MSM ever told us what party affiliation Elliott Spitzer is?
Didn't think so.
>>
>>Paul
>>
>
> I found one. He said you don't really exist.
One could hope, couldn't they? :>~
