Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Opus X
Re: Opus X
In article <xcmLj.4259$3w2.1812@trnddc05>, "Dan" <daniel.@verizon.not>
wrote:
> Unc G wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
> >
> > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > you chose to not participate.
>
> He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !
I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
standards.
I don't have any quibble with that, btw. The WHOLE POINT of starting a
private forum and only inviting those you like is so you can control who
does and does not post there, so you don't have to read my postings, if
it bothers you. I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
appreciate my "wit and charm."
THIS forum, of course, relishes my several contributions. :) (And
those who don't can use filters, just like everyone else.)
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <xcmLj.4259$3w2.1812@trnddc05>, "Dan" <daniel.@verizon.not>
wrote:
> Unc G wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
> >
> > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > you chose to not participate.
>
> He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !
I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
standards.
I don't have any quibble with that, btw. The WHOLE POINT of starting a
private forum and only inviting those you like is so you can control who
does and does not post there, so you don't have to read my postings, if
it bothers you. I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
appreciate my "wit and charm."
THIS forum, of course, relishes my several contributions. :) (And
those who don't can use filters, just like everyone else.)
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: Opus X
On Apr 10, 9:22 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
wrote:
> In article <xcmLj.4259$3w2.1812@trnddc05>, "Dan" <dani...@verizon.not>
> wrote:
>
> > Unc G wrote:
> > > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
>
> > > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > > you chose to not participate.
>
> > He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !
>
> I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
> booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
> I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
> standards.
>
> I don't have any quibble with that, btw. The WHOLE POINT of starting a
> private forum and only inviting those you like is so you can control who
> does and does not post there, so you don't have to read my postings, if
> it bothers you. I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
> not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
> appreciate my "wit and charm."
>
> THIS forum, of course, relishes my several contributions. :) (And
> those who don't can use filters, just like everyone else.)
Sorry but that's not correct! We who choose to use Google have no way
to filter your incessant nonsense. You show no wit nor charm and there
are only a few who reply to your blather. For that matter, there are
only a few left to reply!
On Apr 10, 9:22 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
wrote:
> In article <xcmLj.4259$3w2.1812@trnddc05>, "Dan" <dani...@verizon.not>
> wrote:
>
> > Unc G wrote:
> > > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked,com >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
>
> > > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > > you chose to not participate.
>
> > He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !
>
> I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
> booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
> I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
> standards.
>
> I don't have any quibble with that, btw. The WHOLE POINT of starting a
> private forum and only inviting those you like is so you can control who
> does and does not post there, so you don't have to read my postings, if
> it bothers you. I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
> not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
> appreciate my "wit and charm."
>
> THIS forum, of course, relishes my several contributions. :) (And
> those who don't can use filters, just like everyone else.)
Sorry but that's not correct! We who choose to use Google have no way
to filter your incessant nonsense. You show no wit nor charm and there
are only a few who reply to your blather. For that matter, there are
only a few left to reply!
Re: Opus X
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
[...]
> We who choose to use Google have no way
> to filter your incessant nonsense.
[...]
That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
as one does exist.
http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
--
David
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
[...]
> We who choose to use Google have no way
> to filter your incessant nonsense.
[...]
That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
as one does exist.
http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> [...]
>
> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> [...]
>
> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
> as one does exist.
>
> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> --
> David
I not only choose to use Google but must do so for work related issues
as well. Besides, only those who can't refute the truth use filters.
On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> [...]
>
> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> [...]
>
> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
> as one does exist.
>
> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> --
> David
I not only choose to use Google but must do so for work related issues
as well. Besides, only those who can't refute the truth use filters.
Re: Opus X
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > We who choose to use Google have no way
>> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
>> solutio
> n
>> as one does exist.
>>
>> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>>
>> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>>
>> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>>
>> --
>> David
>
>
> I not only choose to use Google but must do so for work related issues
> as well. Besides, only those who can't refute the truth use filters.
>
You obviously have reading comprehension issues as well as mental health
issues. Lets address them one at a time shall we?
1) You claim YOU have no way to filter out posts using google.
As above, you are incorrect, there is a way to filter posts when using
google, and now that you see you are wrong you choose the tact that those
who cant refute the truth use filters. You can't have it both ways. You
either ignore the posts you claim are in your way, or you filter them
out, commenting on them and then claiming you dont have a way to filter
them is a bit like the dog laying on the nail sticking out of the porch
and howling rather than getting off its ass and moving off the nail...
2) I never said anything about using google, but now that you mention it,
if your employer does not allow you access to usenet, going around that
rule by using google dosent seem like such a wise move does it? I guess
the rules are only for some people...
--
David
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > We who choose to use Google have no way
>> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
>> solutio
> n
>> as one does exist.
>>
>> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>>
>> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>>
>> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>>
>> --
>> David
>
>
> I not only choose to use Google but must do so for work related issues
> as well. Besides, only those who can't refute the truth use filters.
>
You obviously have reading comprehension issues as well as mental health
issues. Lets address them one at a time shall we?
1) You claim YOU have no way to filter out posts using google.
As above, you are incorrect, there is a way to filter posts when using
google, and now that you see you are wrong you choose the tact that those
who cant refute the truth use filters. You can't have it both ways. You
either ignore the posts you claim are in your way, or you filter them
out, commenting on them and then claiming you dont have a way to filter
them is a bit like the dog laying on the nail sticking out of the porch
and howling rather than getting off its ass and moving off the nail...
2) I never said anything about using google, but now that you mention it,
if your employer does not allow you access to usenet, going around that
rule by using google dosent seem like such a wise move does it? I guess
the rules are only for some people...
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> [...]
>
> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> [...]
>
> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
> as one does exist.
>
> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> --
> David
Ted?
On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> [...]
>
> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> [...]
>
> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a solution
> as one does exist.
>
> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> --
> David
Ted?
Re: Opus X
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > We who choose to use Google have no way
>> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
>> solutio
> n
>> as one does exist.
>>
>> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>>
>> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>>
>> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>>
>> --
>> David
>
>
> Ted?
>
Try to gather your thoughts before you answer the posts.
You have google, use it to google my nym, its been unchanged for many,
many years.
--
David
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > We who choose to use Google have no way
>> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
>> solutio
> n
>> as one does exist.
>>
>> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>>
>> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>>
>> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>>
>> --
>> David
>
>
> Ted?
>
Try to gather your thoughts before you answer the posts.
You have google, use it to google my nym, its been unchanged for many,
many years.
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 10, 1:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> >> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
> >> solutio
> > n
> >> as one does exist.
>
> >> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> >> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> >> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> >> --
> >> David
>
> > Ted?
>
> Try to gather your thoughts before you answer the posts.
>
> You have google, use it to google my nym, its been unchanged for many,
> many years.
>
> --
> David- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
So sorry mary!
On Apr 10, 1:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 10, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> > We who choose to use Google have no way
> >> > to filter your incessant nonsense.
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> That statement is false, you choose to be too stupid to seek out a
> >> solutio
> > n
> >> as one does exist.
>
> >> http :// www .penney.org/ggkiller.html
>
> >> Now lets see if you can do as you say you'd like. Somehow I doubt it.
>
> >> Next you will be telling us you choose NOT to use firefox...
>
> >> --
> >> David
>
> > Ted?
>
> Try to gather your thoughts before you answer the posts.
>
> You have google, use it to google my nym, its been unchanged for many,
> many years.
>
> --
> David- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
So sorry mary!
Re: Opus X
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are called to
the mat.
--
David
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are called to
the mat.
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are called to
> the mat.
>
> --
> David
Truth needs no defense, mary.
On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are called to
> the mat.
>
> --
> David
Truth needs no defense, mary.
Re: Opus X
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
>> called to the mat.
>>
>
> Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
I dont post from google.
I dont post from the same IP or provider.
All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
head.
I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
anyway)
Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
the balls to admit your wrong that is.
--
David
* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
>> called to the mat.
>>
>
> Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
I dont post from google.
I dont post from the same IP or provider.
All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
head.
I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
anyway)
Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
the balls to admit your wrong that is.
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 11, 12:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
> >> called to the mat.
>
> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>
> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
> I dont post from google.
> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
> head.
>
> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
> you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
> anyway)
>
> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>
> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
> and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
> the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>
> --
> David
You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
is that enough similarity yet?
JtN ©2008
On Apr 11, 12:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
> >> called to the mat.
>
> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>
> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
> I dont post from google.
> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
> head.
>
> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
> you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
> anyway)
>
> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>
> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
> and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
> the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>
> --
> David
You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
is that enough similarity yet?
JtN ©2008
Re: Opus X
In article
<365ec6e2-074f-47ce-bcbd-3c605210552e@59g2000hsb.googlegroups,com >,
JtN© <jim_the_Newbie@hotmail,com > wrote:
> You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
> is that enough similarity yet?
Has anyone seen them in the same room, together...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article
<365ec6e2-074f-47ce-bcbd-3c605210552e@59g2000hsb.googlegroups,com >,
JtN© <jim_the_Newbie@hotmail,com > wrote:
> You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
> is that enough similarity yet?
Has anyone seen them in the same room, together...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: Opus X
* JtN© wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 11, 12:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
>> >> called to the mat.
>>
>> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>>
>> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>>
>> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
>> I dont post from google.
>> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
>> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of
>> giving head.
>>
>> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything
>> but you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you
>> had any anyway)
>>
>> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
>> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>>
>> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my
>> nym/email and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary,
>> IF you've got the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>>
>
> You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
> is that enough similarity yet?
Damn, ya got me! oh wait, whats this dangly thing? ;)
--
David
* JtN© wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
> On Apr 11, 12:56 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
>> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>>
>> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
>> >> called to the mat.
>>
>> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>>
>> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>>
>> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
>> I dont post from google.
>> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
>> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of
>> giving head.
>>
>> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything
>> but you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you
>> had any anyway)
>>
>> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
>> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>>
>> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my
>> nym/email and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary,
>> IF you've got the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>>
>
> You both smoke cigars and you both post on ASC and you both ... well
> is that enough similarity yet?
Damn, ya got me! oh wait, whats this dangly thing? ;)
--
David
Re: Opus X
On Apr 11, 11:56 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
> >> called to the mat.
>
> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>
> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
> I dont post from google.
> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
> head.
>
> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
> you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
> anyway)
>
> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>
> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
> and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
> the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>
> --
> David
Most of what you post is just as twisted and convoluted as mary and/or
ted. No matter what the headers say you sound like both. I don't care
if you're either or neither but you come across like they do so live
with it or change your posting style.
On Apr 11, 11:56 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> > On Apr 11, 10:27 am, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail,com > wrote:
> >> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> How pathetic and sad that you cant defend yourself when you are
> >> called to the mat.
>
> > Truth needs no defense, mary.
>
> How about proof since you have no idea what the truth is, obviously.
>
> My posting style is nothing like Mary's.
> I dont post from google.
> I dont post from the same IP or provider.
> All the evidence is there. Learn how to read headers instead of giving
> head.
>
> I realize that when youve been beaten so badly you reach for anything but
> you've lost all credibility based on this exchange (not that you had any
> anyway)
>
> Let me know when you ready for a battle of wits, but I am fourty so I
> dont have another 50 years to wait so get with it.
>
> Since you live at google during your work day why not google my nym/email
> and see if you can find any similarity between me and Mary, IF you've got
> the balls to admit your wrong that is.
>
> --
> David
Most of what you post is just as twisted and convoluted as mary and/or
ted. No matter what the headers say you sound like both. I don't care
if you're either or neither but you come across like they do so live
with it or change your posting style.
Next: Attn: Anti~Smokers, We' ve Lost 64.7 Million Dollars <== Thanks To You!
Previous: Time to Start a New Swap?
