Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 12:29
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 17:11
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 17:15
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 28 May 2008, 17:12
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 00:20
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 02:01
-- deleted messages --
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
It's amazing what you can prove if you select your "statistical sample".
Madison Avenue used the 86% of doctors surveyed - - - blah blah blah. Just never
mentioned that they selected the names from a list that a previous survey showed
agreed with the crap they were trying to sell.
Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
On 23 Apr 2008 01:24:36 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>
> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
It's amazing what you can prove if you select your "statistical sample".
Madison Avenue used the 86% of doctors surveyed - - - blah blah blah. Just never
mentioned that they selected the names from a list that a previous survey showed
agreed with the crap they were trying to sell.
Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
On 23 Apr 2008 01:24:36 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>
> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
In article <7eju04h63e1ttdqlttou97l79rn9i4bnhd@4ax . com >,
ljlamere@acd . net <ljlamere@acd . net > wrote:
>
>On 23 Apr 2008 01:24:36 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>
>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>It's amazing what you can prove if you select your "statistical sample".
>
>Madison Avenue used the 86% of doctors surveyed - - - blah blah blah. Just never
>mentioned that they selected the names from a list that a previous survey showed
>agreed with the crap they were trying to sell.
>
>Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
Denial.
In article <7eju04h63e1ttdqlttou97l79rn9i4bnhd@4ax . com >,
ljlamere@acd . net <ljlamere@acd . net > wrote:
>
>On 23 Apr 2008 01:24:36 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>
>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>It's amazing what you can prove if you select your "statistical sample".
>
>Madison Avenue used the 86% of doctors surveyed - - - blah blah blah. Just never
>mentioned that they selected the names from a list that a previous survey showed
>agreed with the crap they were trying to sell.
>
>Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
Denial.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
> Denial.
Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
> Denial.
Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>
>> Denial.
>
>Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
Apparently he is deep in denial.
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>
>> Denial.
>
>Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
Apparently he is deep in denial.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Mickey wrote:
> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>
>> In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
>> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>>
>>>> Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>>
>>> Denial.
>>
>> Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this
>> morning...!
>
> Apparently he is deep in denial.
Perhaps he'll drown in it?
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
Mickey wrote:
> Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote:
>
>> In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
>> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>>
>>>> Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>>
>>> Denial.
>>
>> Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this
>> morning...!
>
> Apparently he is deep in denial.
Perhaps he'll drown in it?
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in message
news:Misc-D2570E.08400323042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net ...
> In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>
>> Denial.
>
> Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
The smallest brains are connected to the biggest mouths.
"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in message
news:Misc-D2570E.08400323042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net ...
> In article <1208964702.424394@irys.nyx . net >,
> anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>> >Figures don't lie but liars sure figure.
>
>> Denial.
>
> Bruce certainly seems to have his denial in good form, this morning...!
The smallest brains are connected to the biggest mouths.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Bruce Watson wrote:
> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>
> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
My friends, Bruce is a "high-class" troll. But, a troll the same. I
reply only to highlight that it's ok to put him in your kill-file. I
have just done so.
I think I'll celebrate my new kill-file addition with a nice bowl of
tobacco.
-Allen
(Simply take a class in epidemiology to determine how these and many
other tests fail to pass the mark of statistical validity. It's a
wonder that any medical studies actually tell us anything useful these
days.)
--
------
a.s.p. Brother of the Briar
May 2001
Bruce Watson wrote:
> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>
> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
My friends, Bruce is a "high-class" troll. But, a troll the same. I
reply only to highlight that it's ok to put him in your kill-file. I
have just done so.
I think I'll celebrate my new kill-file addition with a nice bowl of
tobacco.
-Allen
(Simply take a class in epidemiology to determine how these and many
other tests fail to pass the mark of statistical validity. It's a
wonder that any medical studies actually tell us anything useful these
days.)
--
------
a.s.p. Brother of the Briar
May 2001
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>Bruce Watson wrote:
>> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>
>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>
>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
Huh?
I'm a Democrat.
In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>Bruce Watson wrote:
>> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>
>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>
>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
Huh?
I'm a Democrat.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
well, you are not a very good one if you are a Democrat. It is the
party of the people, the party of inclusion, not the prissy piss ants
who condem smokers but not the tobacco industry. If a real Democrat
believed in the anti smoking cocamamie, they would be demanding the
industry produce a 'safer' cigarette, trying to protect the people who
do smoke but no, you assholes attack the user and not the producer!
Bruce Watson wrote:
> In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
> Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>
>>Bruce Watson wrote:
>>
>>>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>>
>>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>>
>>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
>
>
> Huh?
>
> I'm a Democrat.
well, you are not a very good one if you are a Democrat. It is the
party of the people, the party of inclusion, not the prissy piss ants
who condem smokers but not the tobacco industry. If a real Democrat
believed in the anti smoking cocamamie, they would be demanding the
industry produce a 'safer' cigarette, trying to protect the people who
do smoke but no, you assholes attack the user and not the producer!
Bruce Watson wrote:
> In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
> Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>
>>Bruce Watson wrote:
>>
>>>Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>>and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>>(+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>>former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>>
>>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>>
>>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
>
>
> Huh?
>
> I'm a Democrat.
