Opus X

Re: Opus X

* MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:

>
>

More avoiding the issue, typical Troll tactics. I need not live with
anything, it is you that cant face the truth.

--
David

Re: Opus X

On Apr 14, 12:11 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
>
>
> More avoiding the issue, typical Troll tactics. I need not live with
> anything, it is you that cant face the truth.
>
> --
> David


Talk about typical troll tactics. You didn't quote my reply because
you don't want others to read the truth.

Re: Opus X

On Apr 10, 10:22 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
wrote:
> In article <xcmLj.4259$3w2.1812@trnddc05>, "Dan" <dani...@verizon.not>
> wrote:
>
> > Unc G wrote:
> > > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
> > > wrote:
>
> > > > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
>
> > > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > > you chose to not participate.
>
> > He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !
>
> I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
> booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
> I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
> standards.
>
> I don't have any quibble with that, btw. The WHOLE POINT of starting a
> private forum and only inviting those you like is so you can control who
> does and does not post there, so you don't have to read my postings, if
> it bothers you. I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
> not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
> appreciate my "wit and charm."
>
> THIS forum, of course, relishes my several contributions. :) (And
> those who don't can use filters, just like everyone else.)
>
> --
> Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
> I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which se=
nds
> unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.=


Ted ... you never kissed his ass enough to be able to stay on the
board. The only and I mean the only reason you were allowed onto that
forum the first time was so that he could boot your ass off of it
but ... well ... he goated you into doing what he wanted so he could
be the big man and kick your ass like he wants and says he wants to do
to so many in person but to this day has never seen those he threatens
a 2nd time but he talks the talk big time.

You were set up to be booted ... plain and simple but dont fret, that
forum is about what most private forums are and its quite funny to see
how the participants act. To bad the forum owner doesn't realize and
know that some he hates with a passion is there reading and
participating.

JtN ©2008

Re: Opus X

In article
<cc4af803-471e-4e02-b8d8-d6f3d2cd401e@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
JtN© <jim_the_Newbie@hotmail . com > wrote:

> You were set up to be booted ... plain and simple

Not that it matters much, anymore, but I don't actually believe that.
Tim & I *ALMOST* get along and, I'm sure that, after a hiatus from me,
his memory softened & he genuinely thought it'd work out. For that
matter, so did I.

As I said, I don't hold those guys any grudges -- as far as I know,
they're all pretty decent people -- I just didn't want anyone spreading
rumors that I never "don't-post" to anything.

Misc "unlike THIS thread... ;)"

--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.

Re: Opus X


"Miss Elaine Eos" <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in message
news:Misc-498FDF.16130310042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net ...


> As I said, I don't hold those guys any grudges -- as far as I know,
> they're all pretty decent people -- I just didn't want anyone spreading
> rumors that I never "don't-post" to anything.

Don't worry, your efforts in that regard have not gone unnoticed.

Re: Opus X

JtN© wrote:

>
> Ted ... you never kissed his ass enough to be able to stay on the
> board. The only and I mean the only reason you were allowed onto that
> forum the first time was so that he could boot your ass off of it
> but ... well ... he goated you into doing what he wanted so he could
> be the big man and kick your ass like he wants and says he wants to do
> to so many in person but to this day has never seen those he threatens
> a 2nd time but he talks the talk big time.
>
> JtN ©2008

Who is "he"?

bernie




--
"Official ASC Shaman"

Re: Opus X

On Apr 11, 3:22 pm, "btorvik2" <btorv...@aol . com > wrote:
> JtN© wrote:
>
> > Ted ... you never kissed his ass enough to be able to stay on the
> > board. The only and I mean the only reason you were allowed onto that
> > forum the first time was so that he could boot your ass off of it
> > but ... well ... he goated you into doing what he wanted so he could
> > be the big man and kick your ass like he wants and says he wants to do
> > to so many in person but to this day has never seen those he threatens
> > a 2nd time but he talks the talk big time.
>
> > JtN ©2008
>
> Who is "he"?
>
> bernie
>
> --
> "Official ASC Shaman"


TimL = he

Re: Opus X

btorvik2 wrote:
> JtN© wrote:
>
>> Ted ... you never kissed his ass enough to be able to stay on the
>> board. The only and I mean the only reason you were allowed onto that
>> forum the first time was so that he could boot your ass off of it
>> but ... well ... he goated you into doing what he wanted so he could
>> be the big man and kick your ass like he wants and says he wants to do
>> to so many in person but to this day has never seen those he threatens
>> a 2nd time but he talks the talk big time.
>>
>> JtN ©2008
>
> Who is "he"?
>
> bernie

Judging from the character assessment, Timfoil hat.

Re: Opus X

On Apr 13, 8:35 am, jeremy <jer...@j-ellendesigns . com > wrote:
> btorvik2 wrote:
> > JtN© wrote:
>
> >> Ted ... you never kissed his ass enough to be able to stay on the
> >> board. The only and I mean the only reason you were allowed onto that
> >> forum the first time was so that he could boot your ass off of it
> >> but ... well ... he goated you into doing what he wanted so he could
> >> be the big man and kick your ass like he wants and says he wants to do
> >> to so many in person but to this day has never seen those he threatens
> >> a 2nd time but he talks the talk big time.
>
> >> JtN ©2008
>
> > Who is "he"?
>
> > bernie
>
> Judging from the character assessment, Timfoil hat.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


The only poeple posting to ASC are the TimL rejects.

Re: Opus X

On Apr 10, 9:22 am, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
wrote:


> I just want to make clear that I *HAVE* chosen to
> not-post in a forum -- largely out of courtesy to those who might not
> appreciate my "wit and charm."

Your "wit and charm" is a prime example of "Beauty is in the eye of
the beholder".

What you call your "wit and charm", others apparently call
"silliness".

Re: Opus X

Unc G wrote:

> What you call your "wit and charm", others apparently call
> "silliness".

Whereas you have none of those attributes, and how did you get out of the
killfile again?

JJ

Re: Opus X

Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
>
> I chose not to post the first time, and was booted. The 2nd time, I was
> booted for my WTF-how-can-I-get-kicked-out-for-not-even-posting?! msg.
> I'm told that this single post of mine was categorised as not up to CCF
> standards.

What great standards, I must remember to try and apply them the world. :-)

JJ

Re: Opus X

On Apr 10, 5:44 am, "Dan" <dani...@verizon.not> wrote:
> Unc G wrote:
> > On Apr 8, 11:03 pm, Miss Elaine Eos <M...@your-pants.PlayNaked . com >
> > wrote:
>
> >  > For your information, I was GRANTED entry into CCF *TWICE*! :)
>
> > Then I'd have to add that it's probably better for all concerned that
> > you chose to not participate.
>
> He had no choice, he was booted out....TWICE !

He seems to have conveniently forgotten to include that info.

Re: Opus X

JtN© wrote:
> The name of the
> group is Alt Smoker Cigars not Another Stupid Comment.

Although... :]

Re: Opus X

In article
<71904def-5361-4afa-ad72-0082659d7f29@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups . com >,
JtN© <jim_the_Newbie@hotmail . com > wrote:
> Why do you respond to anything and everything on ASC? The name of the
> group is Alt Smoker Cigars not Another Stupid Comment.
>
> JtN ©2008

Thanks! :)

--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.