Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
alts to the alts
Re: alts to the alts
On Apr 14, 11:33 pm, Bart Goddard <goddar...@netscape . net > wrote:
> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote innews:Xns9A80912C68A8Blouiscypherh=
ellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
>
>
>
>
> > * Bart Goddard wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote in
> >>news:Xns9A807D0CE305Flouiscypherhellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
> >>> 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> >> Yeah. And that first one shows the real reason he's deliberately
> >> chosen to be a PITA. He thinks "cigar content" is "passing along
> >> good deals", which is what the rest of us call "unwanted
> >> solicitation". Ever since
> >> he first poked his ugly, poop-covered nose in here, he's wanted
> >> to use the group for free advertizing. When he got spanked
> >> repeatedly for it, he got huffy. No one would buy cigars from
> >> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
>
> >> B.
>
> > Ahhhh, I did not know that was the WHY, it all makes sense now.
>
> To round out the sickological profile: When he was trying
> to peddle his wares here, people complained that his posts
> were inappropriate for the group, or, you might say "Off Topic".
> So that set off his campaign against all "off topic" posts.
> His real whine is "you won't let me post ads because they're
> off topic, so I'll try to stop you from posting idle chat which
> is also of topic."
>
> He never seemed to get the point that it wasn't the "off topic",
> but the solicitation that was the offensive bit. He can't see
> the difference between chatting at a party and showing up at
> the party to sell Am-Way.
>
> But it should be clear that almost all people at almost all
> times just absolutely loathe solicitors who steal advertizing.
> I pay for a phone and an army of jerks uses it to try to sell
> me siding or get me to vote for Obama. I pay for a fax machine,
> and I can't use it because anonymous vendors keep faxing me
> "great deals" on toner. I pay for internet access, (and
> very indirectly I pay to keep the internet running) and then
> these spammers clog it up with commercial crap.
>
> The em-eye-five stuff is way less offensive, because it's less
> predatory. I put a doorbell on my house, for the convenience
> of my friends when they come to visit, and all it does is
> attract losers who have no other goal in life but to change
> my money into theirs. I didn't really put the doorbell out
> there with the idea that only certain people could ring it,
> but it sure riles me (and most other people) that everytime
> I create a path from my privacy to outside world, it acts
> as a bug light for all the little creeps who want to use
> the path in reverse.
>
> So, in short, if you take Mr. Haney, and replace the cute
> rustic charm with hungry, gnawing greed, you've created a
> gladyz. Or sort of like Uriah Heep after a lobotomy.
>
> B.
>
> --
> Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I do read ASCM but can't remember a time I've ever posted a reply
there much less something for sale. I have nothing to sell; I have
never offered anything for sale in any newsgroup. I want to hear/read
about good deals. Some of you are so paranoid about spam it's become
a
sickness. Nonetheless, ASP is a great example of how Off-Topic and
For-
Sale can peacefully co-exist. The current crop of ASCers are too anal
or set-in-their-way to accept that.
On Apr 14, 11:33 pm, Bart Goddard <goddar...@netscape . net > wrote:
> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote innews:Xns9A80912C68A8Blouiscypherh=
ellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
>
>
>
>
> > * Bart Goddard wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
> >> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote in
> >>news:Xns9A807D0CE305Flouiscypherhellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
> >>> 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> >> Yeah. And that first one shows the real reason he's deliberately
> >> chosen to be a PITA. He thinks "cigar content" is "passing along
> >> good deals", which is what the rest of us call "unwanted
> >> solicitation". Ever since
> >> he first poked his ugly, poop-covered nose in here, he's wanted
> >> to use the group for free advertizing. When he got spanked
> >> repeatedly for it, he got huffy. No one would buy cigars from
> >> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
>
> >> B.
>
> > Ahhhh, I did not know that was the WHY, it all makes sense now.
>
> To round out the sickological profile: When he was trying
> to peddle his wares here, people complained that his posts
> were inappropriate for the group, or, you might say "Off Topic".
> So that set off his campaign against all "off topic" posts.
> His real whine is "you won't let me post ads because they're
> off topic, so I'll try to stop you from posting idle chat which
> is also of topic."
>
> He never seemed to get the point that it wasn't the "off topic",
> but the solicitation that was the offensive bit. He can't see
> the difference between chatting at a party and showing up at
> the party to sell Am-Way.
>
> But it should be clear that almost all people at almost all
> times just absolutely loathe solicitors who steal advertizing.
> I pay for a phone and an army of jerks uses it to try to sell
> me siding or get me to vote for Obama. I pay for a fax machine,
> and I can't use it because anonymous vendors keep faxing me
> "great deals" on toner. I pay for internet access, (and
> very indirectly I pay to keep the internet running) and then
> these spammers clog it up with commercial crap.
>
> The em-eye-five stuff is way less offensive, because it's less
> predatory. I put a doorbell on my house, for the convenience
> of my friends when they come to visit, and all it does is
> attract losers who have no other goal in life but to change
> my money into theirs. I didn't really put the doorbell out
> there with the idea that only certain people could ring it,
> but it sure riles me (and most other people) that everytime
> I create a path from my privacy to outside world, it acts
> as a bug light for all the little creeps who want to use
> the path in reverse.
>
> So, in short, if you take Mr. Haney, and replace the cute
> rustic charm with hungry, gnawing greed, you've created a
> gladyz. Or sort of like Uriah Heep after a lobotomy.
>
> B.
>
> --
> Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I do read ASCM but can't remember a time I've ever posted a reply
there much less something for sale. I have nothing to sell; I have
never offered anything for sale in any newsgroup. I want to hear/read
about good deals. Some of you are so paranoid about spam it's become
a
sickness. Nonetheless, ASP is a great example of how Off-Topic and
For-
Sale can peacefully co-exist. The current crop of ASCers are too anal
or set-in-their-way to accept that.
Re: alts to the alts
On Apr 14, 1:33 pm, Bart Goddard <goddar...@netscape . net > wrote:
> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote innews:Xns9A807D0CE305Flouiscypherh=
ellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
> > 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> Yeah. And that first one shows the real reason he's deliberately
> chosen to be a PITA. He thinks "cigar content" is "passing along
> good deals", which is what the rest of us call "unwanted solicitation". =
> Ever since
> he first poked his ugly, poop-covered nose in here, he's wanted
> to use the group for free advertizing. When he got spanked
> repeatedly for it, he got huffy. No one would buy cigars from
> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
>
> B.
>
> --
> Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Please see my reply to JtN later in theis thread.
On Apr 14, 1:33 pm, Bart Goddard <goddar...@netscape . net > wrote:
> SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote innews:Xns9A807D0CE305Flouiscypherh=
ellorg@140.99.99.130:
>
> > 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> Yeah. And that first one shows the real reason he's deliberately
> chosen to be a PITA. He thinks "cigar content" is "passing along
> good deals", which is what the rest of us call "unwanted solicitation". =
> Ever since
> he first poked his ugly, poop-covered nose in here, he's wanted
> to use the group for free advertizing. When he got spanked
> repeatedly for it, he got huffy. No one would buy cigars from
> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
>
> B.
>
> --
> Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Please see my reply to JtN later in theis thread.
Re: alts to the alts
In article <Xns9A8089F948140goddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.81>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> No one would buy cigars from
> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
Because he doesn't sell Cubans...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <Xns9A8089F948140goddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.81>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> No one would buy cigars from
> such an lying, stealing hypocrit, and he can't figure out why.
Because he doesn't sell Cubans...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: alts to the alts
On Apr 14, 12:17 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
>
>
> 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> Message-ID: <cc70a8b7-2ce6-4812-8590-855efb1c1c8a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <5ae3930a-d882-4c6f-bace-cdd51eb5ac2b@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <9ac4ad78-3f40-4d40-9aea-1665c28b6302@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <d73fdb77-71bc-48fe-8311-f9039d2956f7@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <37bbb4c8-374d-4f52-944c-90472957a74e@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <f3bb0911-0990-4b26-9170-e1536d1afd41@m71g2000hse.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <d794ee69-1aba-43ed-b4f1-d09d76e0aa78@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups=
. com >
>
> --
> David
If it's about ASC or an ASCer it's on-topic.
On Apr 14, 12:17 pm, SINNER <arcade.mas...@gmail . com > wrote:
> * MikeZ wrote in alt.smokers.cigars:
>
>
>
> 10 Posts and 7 had no cigar content and the other 3 where threats
>
> Message-ID: <cc70a8b7-2ce6-4812-8590-855efb1c1c8a@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <5ae3930a-d882-4c6f-bace-cdd51eb5ac2b@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <9ac4ad78-3f40-4d40-9aea-1665c28b6302@b64g2000hsa.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <d73fdb77-71bc-48fe-8311-f9039d2956f7@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <37bbb4c8-374d-4f52-944c-90472957a74e@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <f3bb0911-0990-4b26-9170-e1536d1afd41@m71g2000hse.googlegroups=
. com >
> Message-ID: <d794ee69-1aba-43ed-b4f1-d09d76e0aa78@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups=
. com >
>
> --
> David
If it's about ASC or an ASCer it's on-topic.
Re: alts to the alts
In article <Xns9A7DBBA1591FDgoddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.81>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
> news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>
>
> >> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
> >
> > I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>
> Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
> 70.
Why would anyone want 1.5 feet?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <Xns9A7DBBA1591FDgoddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.81>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
> news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>
>
> >> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
> >
> > I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>
> Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
> 70.
Why would anyone want 1.5 feet?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
Re: alts to the alts
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in news:Misc-
70A1FB.19030211042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net :
>> Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>> 70.
>
> Why would anyone want 1.5 feet?
Depends...<ahem> on what, exactly, you want to measure...
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Miss Elaine Eos <Misc@your-pants.PlayNaked . com > wrote in news:Misc-
70A1FB.19030211042008@news.sf.sbcglobal . net :
>> Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>> 70.
>
> Why would anyone want 1.5 feet?
Depends...<ahem> on what, exactly, you want to measure...
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Re: alts to the alts
On 11 Apr 2008 23:26:40 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net >
wrote:
>Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
>news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>
>
>>> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
>>
>> I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>
>Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>70.
>
>B.
Bart, you have to understand the Bernieism. :-)
CigarBaron
(loses comprehension)
On 11 Apr 2008 23:26:40 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net >
wrote:
>Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
>news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>
>
>>> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
>>
>> I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>
>Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>70.
>
>B.
Bart, you have to understand the Bernieism. :-)
CigarBaron
(loses comprehension)
Re: alts to the alts
Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote in
news:9oe1045q3spce1blrn717m45ao5a6quiba@4ax . com :
> On 11 Apr 2008 23:26:40 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net >
> wrote:
>
>>Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
>>news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>>
>>
>>>> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
>>>
>>> I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>>
>>Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>>70.
>>
>>B.
>
> Bart, you have to understand the Bernieism. :-)
Is that possible?
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Marc Schneiderman <garbaron@telerama . com > wrote in
news:9oe1045q3spce1blrn717m45ao5a6quiba@4ax . com :
> On 11 Apr 2008 23:26:40 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net >
> wrote:
>
>>Justin C <justin.0804@purestblue . com > wrote in
>>news:slrnfvvmor.673.justin.0804@stigmata.purestblue . com :
>>
>>
>>>> Whats's wrong with being in your 70s?
>>>
>>> I thought it meant having 70 feet...
>>
>>Um..."sesqui" means "one and a half". It has nothing to do with
>>70.
>>
>>B.
>
> Bart, you have to understand the Bernieism. :-)
Is that possible?
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Re: alts to the alts
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
> Heh. KNowing how "well loved" the JR Alts are, I thought you guys
> would get a kick out of this week's weekly special...
>
> JR Weekly Special: "Not Quite Good Enough" Alternatives...
So the whole line is on special?
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
Miss Elaine Eos wrote:
> Heh. KNowing how "well loved" the JR Alts are, I thought you guys
> would get a kick out of this week's weekly special...
>
> JR Weekly Special: "Not Quite Good Enough" Alternatives...
So the whole line is on special?
bernie
--
"Official ASC Shaman"
