Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
In article <CALPj.4442$pn4.1678@trnddc03>,
Irishlefty <travdevine@gmail . com > wrote:
>well, you are not a very good one if you are a Democrat. It is the
>party of the people, the party of inclusion, not the prissy piss ants
>who condem smokers but not the tobacco industry. If a real Democrat
>believed in the anti smoking cocamamie, they would be demanding the
>industry produce a 'safer' cigarette, trying to protect the people who
>do smoke but no, you assholes attack the user and not the producer!
Cigarettes should be made completely of stainless steel.
In article <CALPj.4442$pn4.1678@trnddc03>,
Irishlefty <travdevine@gmail . com > wrote:
>well, you are not a very good one if you are a Democrat. It is the
>party of the people, the party of inclusion, not the prissy piss ants
>who condem smokers but not the tobacco industry. If a real Democrat
>believed in the anti smoking cocamamie, they would be demanding the
>industry produce a 'safer' cigarette, trying to protect the people who
>do smoke but no, you assholes attack the user and not the producer!
Cigarettes should be made completely of stainless steel.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
>Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>>Bruce Watson wrote:
>>> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>>
>>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>>
>>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
>
>Huh?
>
>I'm a Democrat.
Now there's a shock. :-/
anon3c67@nyx.nyx . net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>In article <funtb5$53l$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
>Allen <ajhalldeleteme@gmail . com > wrote:
>>Bruce Watson wrote:
>>> Our sample consists of 157 centenarians living in Rome, 39 males
>>> and 118 females (ratio m/f =1:3), mean age being 101.59 +/- 1.8 years
>>> (+/-SD), 83.8% of the centenarians have never smoked, 13.5 % are
>>> former smokers, and 2.7% are active smokers.
>>>
>>> * w w w .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15207443
>>
>>Ah, the many time loser, Green-party candidate is back.
>
>Huh?
>
>I'm a Democrat.
Now there's a shock. :-/
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in
news:sm2v04plfbpve1ootj01s6fulkiag0laed@4ax . com :
>>Huh?
>>
>>I'm a Democrat.
>
> Now there's a shock. :-/
That he's a Democrat, or that he conjugated "to be"
correctly? Or that he misspelled "Duh?"
Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
B.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in
news:sm2v04plfbpve1ootj01s6fulkiag0laed@4ax . com :
>>Huh?
>>
>>I'm a Democrat.
>
> Now there's a shock. :-/
That he's a Democrat, or that he conjugated "to be"
correctly? Or that he misspelled "Duh?"
Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
B.
--
Cheerfully resisting change since 1959.
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 23:11
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 23:30
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 00:22
-- deleted messages --
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Ersatz Pundit Troll Shane <s...@comcast . net > wrote:
>
> Nothing running wild here. Republicans are all for denying consenting
> adults the right to decide who they should marry and how they should
> handle their pregnancies. If that's not intruding into the lives of
> private citizens and restricting their rights, I don't know what is.
Spin . . .spin . . .spin. No wonder the moron is so dizzy.
Ersatz Pundit Troll Shane <s...@comcast . net > wrote:
>
> Nothing running wild here. Republicans are all for denying consenting
> adults the right to decide who they should marry and how they should
> handle their pregnancies. If that's not intruding into the lives of
> private citizens and restricting their rights, I don't know what is.
Spin . . .spin . . .spin. No wonder the moron is so dizzy.
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 02:16
-- deleted messages --
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Or a group that actually thinks that solving health care problems can
be done by giving it over to the federal government. You want to keep
smoking? Then don't vote for universal health care. It's a small
leap from there to the fed telling you what unhealthy things you can
and can not do. If the Gov. can't sort out their own problems what
makes you think they can fix your health?
Or a group that actually thinks that solving health care problems can
be done by giving it over to the federal government. You want to keep
smoking? Then don't vote for universal health care. It's a small
leap from there to the fed telling you what unhealthy things you can
and can not do. If the Gov. can't sort out their own problems what
makes you think they can fix your health?
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
"Bill" <williamdochnahl@adelphia . net > wrote in message
news:f8808980-4992-4300-8bf7-468626d6292a@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups . com ...
> Or a group that actually thinks that solving health care problems can
> be done by giving it over to the federal government. You want to keep
> smoking? Then don't vote for universal health care. It's a small
> leap from there to the fed telling you what unhealthy things you can
> and can not do. If the Gov. can't sort out their own problems what
> makes you think they can fix your health?
The problem is that if you look at the outcomes (life expectancy, rates of
illness, child mortality, etc) the private approach does no better than
state-funded health care -- worse, if you correlate with healthcare
expenditure.
"Bill" <williamdochnahl@adelphia . net > wrote in message
news:f8808980-4992-4300-8bf7-468626d6292a@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups . com ...
> Or a group that actually thinks that solving health care problems can
> be done by giving it over to the federal government. You want to keep
> smoking? Then don't vote for universal health care. It's a small
> leap from there to the fed telling you what unhealthy things you can
> and can not do. If the Gov. can't sort out their own problems what
> makes you think they can fix your health?
The problem is that if you look at the outcomes (life expectancy, rates of
illness, child mortality, etc) the private approach does no better than
state-funded health care -- worse, if you correlate with healthcare
expenditure.
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 23 Apr 2008, 23:54
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 00:21
-- deleted messages --
Reply from: -- messaggio eliminato --
Date: 24 Apr 2008, 00:42
-- deleted messages --
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
>Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in
>news:sm2v04plfbpve1ootj01s6fulkiag0laed@4ax . com :
>
>>>Huh?
>>>
>>>I'm a Democrat.
>>
>> Now there's a shock. :-/
>
>That he's a Democrat, or that he conjugated "to be"
>correctly? Or that he misspelled "Duh?"
>
>Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
>the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
Yes, but not "ha ha" funny.
>
>B.
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
>Mickey <Mickey@NOSPAMFatHounds . com > wrote in
>news:sm2v04plfbpve1ootj01s6fulkiag0laed@4ax . com :
>
>>>Huh?
>>>
>>>I'm a Democrat.
>>
>> Now there's a shock. :-/
>
>That he's a Democrat, or that he conjugated "to be"
>correctly? Or that he misspelled "Duh?"
>
>Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
>the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
Yes, but not "ha ha" funny.
>
>B.
Re: Longevity & Smoking: Use your parent's birth certificate.
In article <Xns9A89A2C482281goddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.95>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
> the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
It's for the children, ok...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
In article <Xns9A89A2C482281goddardbenetscapenet@64.209.0.95>,
Bart Goddard <goddardbe@netscape . net > wrote:
> Isn't it funny that the "liberal" party in the US is
> the one trying hardest to restrict what I do?
It's for the children, ok...?
--
Please take off your pants or I won't read your e-mail.
I will not, no matter how "good" the deal, patronise any business which sends
unsolicited commercial e-mail or that advertises in discussion newsgroups.
