"Tom S." <t.m.s.work@cox . net > wrote in message
news:EptMj.105503$Ft5.74836@newsfe15.lga...
> Freedom is a situation/state in which rights can be exercised.
>
> IOW, you can't have freedom without (proper, negative) rights, as you
> can't have rights without the freedom to exercise them.
Freedom is relative, depending on your effective ability to exercise those
rights.
Conversely, active exercise of one's rights can increase or maintain your
overall freedom -- but that's a fairly unpopular stance these days, alas ...
> A right TO something infers that someone else must provide it; that's
> privilege or favors, not a right.
The right to travel is provided by someone else? Who? Amtrak? General
Motors?
Who has to grant you the privilege to bear arms?