Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Pessimistic but true.
Pessimistic but true.
Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
most smokers will return to their habit.
http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax0612jun12,0,836163.story
Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
It addicts. It addicts strongly.
Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
most smokers will return to their habit.
http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax0612jun12,0,836163.story
Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
It addicts. It addicts strongly.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 12, 9:45=EF=BF=BDam, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> It addicts. It addicts strongly.
I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
On Jun 12, 9:45=EF=BF=BDam, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> It addicts. It addicts strongly.
I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
In article
<db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >
> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >
> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >
> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>
> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
have seen the light of day.
In article
<db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >
> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >
> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >
> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>
> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
have seen the light of day.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast,net > wrote:
>In article
><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
>> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
>> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>> >
>> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>> >
>> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>> >
>> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>>
>> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
>> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
>> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
>> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
>> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
>> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
>> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
>> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
>> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
>> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
>> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
>Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
>would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
>public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
>have seen the light of day.
The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness. For
example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
"Smoke-Free Workplaces and Public Places: Secondhand smoke is scientifically proven to
cause lung cancer, heart disease and serious respiratory illnesses and is responsible
nationally for thousands of deaths each year. That’s why a growing number of states and
communities are passing comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws that protect everyone’s
right to breathe clean air."
http :// www .tobaccofreekids.org/campaign/state/
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast,net > wrote:
>In article
><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
>> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
>> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>> >
>> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>> >
>> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>> >
>> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>>
>> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
>> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
>> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
>> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
>> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
>> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
>> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
>> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
>> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
>> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
>> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
>Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
>would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
>public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
>have seen the light of day.
The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness. For
example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
"Smoke-Free Workplaces and Public Places: Secondhand smoke is scientifically proven to
cause lung cancer, heart disease and serious respiratory illnesses and is responsible
nationally for thousands of deaths each year. That’s why a growing number of states and
communities are passing comprehensive smoke-free workplace laws that protect everyone’s
right to breathe clean air."
http :// www .tobaccofreekids.org/campaign/state/
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
Smoke.
On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
Smoke.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbronews2@broughton.ca> wrote:
>On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>>
>> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
>No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
>scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
>of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
>Smoke.
Scientists are dumb. They waste time and money measuring effect size. All they need to do
is count the NUMBER of carcinogens. If A has 40 and B has 20, A is twice as dangerous as
B.
The idea is so simple, an idiot could understand it. If anyone disputes the idea, just say
it's an obvious scientific fact.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbronews2@broughton.ca> wrote:
>On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>>
>> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
>No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
>scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
>of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
>Smoke.
Scientists are dumb. They waste time and money measuring effect size. All they need to do
is count the NUMBER of carcinogens. If A has 40 and B has 20, A is twice as dangerous as
B.
The idea is so simple, an idiot could understand it. If anyone disputes the idea, just say
it's an obvious scientific fact.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> >Smoke.
>
> Scientists are dumb.
No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
much more honest.
On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> >Smoke.
>
> Scientists are dumb.
No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
much more honest.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbronews2@broughton.ca> wrote:
>On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
>> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>>
>> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>>
>> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
>> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
>> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
>> >Smoke.
>>
>> Scientists are dumb.
>
>No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
>much more honest.
Scientists have the same genes and instincts as other humans. They put their pants on one
leg at a time. I was being facetious and you truncated my response. As we all know,
POLITICIANS are truly dumb and dishonest. Are you a politician?
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbronews2@broughton.ca> wrote:
>On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
>> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>>
>> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>>
>> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
>> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
>> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
>> >Smoke.
>>
>> Scientists are dumb.
>
>No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
>much more honest.
Scientists have the same genes and instincts as other humans. They put their pants on one
leg at a time. I was being facetious and you truncated my response. As we all know,
POLITICIANS are truly dumb and dishonest. Are you a politician?
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 13, 7:42 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> >> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> >> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> >> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> >> >Smoke.
>
> >> Scientists are dumb.
>
> >No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
> >much more honest.
>
> Scientists have the same genes and instincts as other humans.
Indeed, but you're a tobacco industry asswipe, not a human.
They put their pants on one
> leg at a time. I was being facetious and you truncated my response. As we all know,
> POLITICIANS are truly dumb and dishonest.
Politicians a humans.
On Jun 13, 7:42 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >On Jun 13, 5:54 am, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:29:13 -0700 (PDT), Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> >> >On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
> >> >> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> >> >No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> >> >scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> >> >of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> >> >Smoke.
>
> >> Scientists are dumb.
>
> >No, liar. Almost all scientists are much smarter than you are, and
> >much more honest.
>
> Scientists have the same genes and instincts as other humans.
Indeed, but you're a tobacco industry asswipe, not a human.
They put their pants on one
> leg at a time. I was being facetious and you truncated my response. As we all know,
> POLITICIANS are truly dumb and dishonest.
Politicians a humans.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 13, 1:29 am, Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> Smoke.
What ???? Here's the TRUTH
I found this posted on the usenet abuse site.
You expect people to believe you ???
Did monkey's fly out of you ass yet?
http :// www .surgeryencyclopedia,com /A-Ce/Artificial-Sphincter-Insertion.html
New Westminster Tennis Club Harbors Internet Stalker as President
New Westminster Tennis Club, Tipperary Park, Third Street and Royal
Avenue,
New Westminster, British Columbia. Phone: (604) 522-6022
Yes it's true, Knowlege will be the best defense.!
Stalker's will not take warning to leave a group alone.
It takes community pressure.
It isn't a far leap for a troll to go into a netstalker
and pedophilia mode. If your a member and have
kids watch out!
An Absolute SHAME for the Westminster Tennis Club !
==>WATCH THE BOTTOM LINE NOW! <===
http :// www .flayme,com /troll/
http :// home.earthlink,net /~bkwormtoo/id21.html
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet trolls
Be consistent - once you have identified their weaknesses
(besides being a loopy, cowardly piece of slime!),
use the information against them, in every response.
We will now establish the netstalker records below.
Read more here:
http :// www .flayme,com /stalker/
Stalkers - however stupid they seem, they can be dangerous!
This site will collect information and resources on how to deal
with stalkers, building an indispensible guide.
Your questions, thoughts and contributions will help -
and will always be acknowledged.
>On May 23, 1:06 pm, Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
On May 23, 9:22 am, Ray Johnstone <r...@iinet,com .au> wrote:
Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
> In the cases of Elia Sterling, Chris Proctor, and John Luik, because
> the tobacco industry paid them, and paid them well.
>
> Add Frederick Seitz and Steven Milloy to this list.
>
> On the payroll of Big Pharma's antismoking industry, major "experts":
>
> Michael Siegel
>
> Wheres your proof that Micheal Siegel is funded by tobacco?
Where did I make the claim that he is funded by tobacco?
> He's asked many to prove it on hi blog at:
http :// tobaccoanalysis.blogspot,com /
>Actually, he admitted a couple of years ago that he had gotten a small
amount of tobacco funding. Has he changed his story?
Now how exactly did a biopsy prove the cause of cancer in Heather
Crowe?
>Seems that Heather's unfortunate death is a big problem for tobacco
industry asswipes such as yourself.
Like lineblockers in football
Oh and what Liars will say:
On May 16, 4:54 am, Greg Carr <gregpc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Whatever. I've been on USENET over a decade and I don't recall this
> person. Google Anthony Tony Beck or Gordon Sauck if you want to find
> out about some criminals not that Beck smokes. Jeremy Tolsma if you
> want to know about a USENET idiot.If you smoke you should quit and I'm
> glad the govt is bringing in even tougher anti-smoking regs.
>
> I was in New West today and the NWPS were doing a crackdown
>around New West Skytrain station.
>The Windsor Hotel has been torn down on
> Columbia St and I like the new view I wonder what will replace it.
You Sure about that huh?
These website's are maintained by the troll~netstalker
The sites that I maintain:
Vancouver 2010 Insider
Real information about the 2010 Winter Games, instead of media hype.
Save Saint Mary's Hospital
The hospital was demolished in April, 2005. However,
local historian Jaimie McEvoy is writing a history of the place.
I've seen some of hist draft material, and it looks pretty good.
Hydro Facts in British Columbia
It's about privatization of public power in British Columbia,
and taking away the power of local governments to regulate
power projects.
The presidency made the troll ~stalker<===
AIRSPACE Action on Smoking and Health
A BC group of Sworn Enemies of the Tobacco Industry.
I was President of it from 1995 to 2001.
grimreaper.org
My first Java program. I'm privileged to have Mr. Reaper
as a friend; most people get to meet him only once.
UBC Thunderbirds Baseball Fan Page
Here's where you find out what a "courtesy runner" is.
Vancouver Bicycle Club
This site was created in 1995, and, along with the BC/Alaska Cycle
Touring FAQ, is among the oldest cycling-related resources
on the internet. I was the President of the Vancouver Bicycle
Club in the early 1990's.
==>right bring your Kids !
Other search terms:
smokers suck: Robert Broughton
hey addicts: Robert Broughton
ignorant pig Robert Broughton
nazi Robert Broughton
fartsmell Robert Broughton (Yes he dares) name another person
george bush Robert Broughton; his respects to: (the american
president)
rush limbaugh Robert Broughton
jackass Robert Broughton
smokers are addicts Robert Broughton
smokers are drug addicts Robert Broughton
smokers are ignorant : Robert Broughton
smokers are pigs: Robert Broughton
smokers stink: Robert Broughton
smokers are criminals: Robert Broughton
Names used:
robert vroughton~ rbronews2(at)broug8hton.ca
From: Malcolm ~rbronenews(at0broughton.ca
and several others
The list of groups offended: Thousands of ignorant postings!
soc.culture.usa
mtl.general
alt.fan.dune
soc.culture.europe
rec.sport.football.canadian
can.legal
edm.general
rec.sport.basketball.college
rec.travel.latin-america
alt.sports.hockey.nhl.vanc-canucks
alt.sports.college.acc
alt.politics.usa.republican
talk.politics.mideast
bc.politics
alt.radio,net works.cbc
ont.politics
alt.politics.bush
wpg.general
tor.general
calgary.general
van.general
alt.politics.democrats.d
can.politics
rec.sport.baseball.college
misc.legal
alt.culture.hawaii
alt.support.stop-smoking
alt.smokers.pipes
alt.smokers.cigars
alt.smokers
can.talk.smoking
rec.sport.baseball.college
rec.sport.baseball.college
Using his webmaster skills he will attempt to hide the Truth
Don't be fooled, these are not accusations.
The facts are on the records.
Read the newsgroups @ google before you
entrust your kids to the tennis clubs programs.
Google groups choose alt.smokers
in alt.smokers newsgroup type asswipes in
the search box and choose search this group.
On Jun 13, 1:29 am, Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
> On Jun 12, 8:27 pm, Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker rudeness.
>
> No, liar, the arguments for smoking bans are based on an obvious
> scientific fact. Tobacco smoke contains 43 known carcinogens. All 43
> of these known carcinogens are present in Second Hand Indoor Tobacco
> Smoke.
What ???? Here's the TRUTH
I found this posted on the usenet abuse site.
You expect people to believe you ???
Did monkey's fly out of you ass yet?
http :// www .surgeryencyclopedia,com /A-Ce/Artificial-Sphincter-Insertion.html
New Westminster Tennis Club Harbors Internet Stalker as President
New Westminster Tennis Club, Tipperary Park, Third Street and Royal
Avenue,
New Westminster, British Columbia. Phone: (604) 522-6022
Yes it's true, Knowlege will be the best defense.!
Stalker's will not take warning to leave a group alone.
It takes community pressure.
It isn't a far leap for a troll to go into a netstalker
and pedophilia mode. If your a member and have
kids watch out!
An Absolute SHAME for the Westminster Tennis Club !
==>WATCH THE BOTTOM LINE NOW! <===
http :// www .flayme,com /troll/
http :// home.earthlink,net /~bkwormtoo/id21.html
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet trolls
Be consistent - once you have identified their weaknesses
(besides being a loopy, cowardly piece of slime!),
use the information against them, in every response.
We will now establish the netstalker records below.
Read more here:
http :// www .flayme,com /stalker/
Stalkers - however stupid they seem, they can be dangerous!
This site will collect information and resources on how to deal
with stalkers, building an indispensible guide.
Your questions, thoughts and contributions will help -
and will always be acknowledged.
>On May 23, 1:06 pm, Malcolm <rbrone...@broughton.ca> wrote:
On May 23, 9:22 am, Ray Johnstone <r...@iinet,com .au> wrote:
Why Do Researchers Tell Lies About Smoking and Health?
> In the cases of Elia Sterling, Chris Proctor, and John Luik, because
> the tobacco industry paid them, and paid them well.
>
> Add Frederick Seitz and Steven Milloy to this list.
>
> On the payroll of Big Pharma's antismoking industry, major "experts":
>
> Michael Siegel
>
> Wheres your proof that Micheal Siegel is funded by tobacco?
Where did I make the claim that he is funded by tobacco?
> He's asked many to prove it on hi blog at:
http :// tobaccoanalysis.blogspot,com /
>Actually, he admitted a couple of years ago that he had gotten a small
amount of tobacco funding. Has he changed his story?
Now how exactly did a biopsy prove the cause of cancer in Heather
Crowe?
>Seems that Heather's unfortunate death is a big problem for tobacco
industry asswipes such as yourself.
Like lineblockers in football
Oh and what Liars will say:
On May 16, 4:54 am, Greg Carr <gregpc...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Whatever. I've been on USENET over a decade and I don't recall this
> person. Google Anthony Tony Beck or Gordon Sauck if you want to find
> out about some criminals not that Beck smokes. Jeremy Tolsma if you
> want to know about a USENET idiot.If you smoke you should quit and I'm
> glad the govt is bringing in even tougher anti-smoking regs.
>
> I was in New West today and the NWPS were doing a crackdown
>around New West Skytrain station.
>The Windsor Hotel has been torn down on
> Columbia St and I like the new view I wonder what will replace it.
You Sure about that huh?
These website's are maintained by the troll~netstalker
The sites that I maintain:
Vancouver 2010 Insider
Real information about the 2010 Winter Games, instead of media hype.
Save Saint Mary's Hospital
The hospital was demolished in April, 2005. However,
local historian Jaimie McEvoy is writing a history of the place.
I've seen some of hist draft material, and it looks pretty good.
Hydro Facts in British Columbia
It's about privatization of public power in British Columbia,
and taking away the power of local governments to regulate
power projects.
The presidency made the troll ~stalker<===
AIRSPACE Action on Smoking and Health
A BC group of Sworn Enemies of the Tobacco Industry.
I was President of it from 1995 to 2001.
grimreaper.org
My first Java program. I'm privileged to have Mr. Reaper
as a friend; most people get to meet him only once.
UBC Thunderbirds Baseball Fan Page
Here's where you find out what a "courtesy runner" is.
Vancouver Bicycle Club
This site was created in 1995, and, along with the BC/Alaska Cycle
Touring FAQ, is among the oldest cycling-related resources
on the internet. I was the President of the Vancouver Bicycle
Club in the early 1990's.
==>right bring your Kids !
Other search terms:
smokers suck: Robert Broughton
hey addicts: Robert Broughton
ignorant pig Robert Broughton
nazi Robert Broughton
fartsmell Robert Broughton (Yes he dares) name another person
george bush Robert Broughton; his respects to: (the american
president)
rush limbaugh Robert Broughton
jackass Robert Broughton
smokers are addicts Robert Broughton
smokers are drug addicts Robert Broughton
smokers are ignorant : Robert Broughton
smokers are pigs: Robert Broughton
smokers stink: Robert Broughton
smokers are criminals: Robert Broughton
Names used:
robert vroughton~ rbronews2(at)broug8hton.ca
From: Malcolm ~rbronenews(at0broughton.ca
and several others
The list of groups offended: Thousands of ignorant postings!
soc.culture.usa
mtl.general
alt.fan.dune
soc.culture.europe
rec.sport.football.canadian
can.legal
edm.general
rec.sport.basketball.college
rec.travel.latin-america
alt.sports.hockey.nhl.vanc-canucks
alt.sports.college.acc
alt.politics.usa.republican
talk.politics.mideast
bc.politics
alt.radio,net works.cbc
ont.politics
alt.politics.bush
wpg.general
tor.general
calgary.general
van.general
alt.politics.democrats.d
can.politics
rec.sport.baseball.college
misc.legal
alt.culture.hawaii
alt.support.stop-smoking
alt.smokers.pipes
alt.smokers.cigars
alt.smokers
can.talk.smoking
rec.sport.baseball.college
rec.sport.baseball.college
Using his webmaster skills he will attempt to hide the Truth
Don't be fooled, these are not accusations.
The facts are on the records.
Read the newsgroups @ google before you
entrust your kids to the tennis clubs programs.
Google groups choose alt.smokers
in alt.smokers newsgroup type asswipes in
the search box and choose search this group.
Re: Pessimistic but true.
In article <6ip354laeoolu6adj36nt047mkhgh46e83@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast,net > wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >> >
> >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >> >
> >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >> >
> >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
> >>
> >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
> >
> >Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> >would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> >public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> >have seen the light of day.
>
> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker
> rudeness. For example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
If you're correct, then the tobacco companies and owners of bars and
restaurants can surely get that point across when they challenge the
next public smoking ban proposal. Right?
In article <6ip354laeoolu6adj36nt047mkhgh46e83@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast,net > wrote:
>
> >In article
> ><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >> >
> >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >> >
> >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >> >
> >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
> >>
> >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
> >
> >Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> >would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> >public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> >have seen the light of day.
>
> The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker
> rudeness. For example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
If you're correct, then the tobacco companies and owners of bars and
restaurants can surely get that point across when they challenge the
next public smoking ban proposal. Right?
Re: Pessimistic but true.
On Jun 13, 8:34 pm, Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast,net > wrote:
> In article <6ip354laeoolu6adj36nt047mkhgh46...@4ax,com >,
>
>
>
> Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast,net > wrote:
>
> > >In article
> > ><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd...@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > > bldrf...@gmail,com wrote:
>
> > >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> > >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> > >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> > >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> > >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> > >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> > >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>
> > >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> > >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> > >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> > >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> > >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> > >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> > >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> > >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> > >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> > >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> > >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> > >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
> > >Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> > >would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> > >public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> > >have seen the light of day.
>
> > The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker
> > rudeness. For example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
>
> If you're correct, then the tobacco companies and owners of bars and
> restaurants can surely get that point across when they challenge the
> next public smoking ban proposal. Right?
What do you know about getting a point across Troll "Twinkie" Shane??
You have the conceptual and logic skills of a gnat. LOL!!
TBN
On Jun 13, 8:34 pm, Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast,net > wrote:
> In article <6ip354laeoolu6adj36nt047mkhgh46...@4ax,com >,
>
>
>
> Robert <n...@e.mail> wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:19:01 -0400, Shawn Hirn <s...@comcast,net > wrote:
>
> > >In article
> > ><db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd...@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > > bldrf...@gmail,com wrote:
>
> > >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> > >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> > >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> > >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> > >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> > >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> > >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>
> > >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> > >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> > >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> > >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> > >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> > >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> > >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> > >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> > >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> > >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> > >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> > >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
> > >Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> > >would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> > >public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> > >have seen the light of day.
>
> > The arguments for smoking bans are based on junk science, not smoker
> > rudeness. For example, Tobacco-Free Kids says:
>
> If you're correct, then the tobacco companies and owners of bars and
> restaurants can surely get that point across when they challenge the
> next public smoking ban proposal. Right?
What do you know about getting a point across Troll "Twinkie" Shane??
You have the conceptual and logic skills of a gnat. LOL!!
TBN
Re: Pessimistic but true.
"Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:srhi-2964DB.19190112062008@comcast.dca.giganews,com ...
> In article
> <db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
>> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
>> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>> >
>> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>> >
>> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>> >
>> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>>
>> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
>> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
>> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
>> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
>> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
>> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
>> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
>> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
>> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
>> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
>> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
> Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> have seen the light of day.
Hey ! Fuck You !
"Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:srhi-2964DB.19190112062008@comcast.dca.giganews,com ...
> In article
> <db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
>
>> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
>> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
>> > most smokers will return to their habit.
>> >
>> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>> >
>> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>> >
>> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>>
>> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
>> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
>> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
>> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
>> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
>> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
>> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
>> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
>> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
>> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
>> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
>
> Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> have seen the light of day.
Hey ! Fuck You !
Re: Pessimistic but true.
In article <g2sr28$42b$1@aioe.org>,
"Huge Wad OF Spit" <WannaSwaller@CopenhagenSpat,com > wrote:
> "Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast,net > wrote in message
> news:srhi-2964DB.19190112062008@comcast.dca.giganews,com ...
> > In article
> > <db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >> >
> >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >> >
> >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >> >
> >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
> >>
> >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
> >
> > Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> > would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> > public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> > have seen the light of day.
>
> Hey ! Fuck You !
You are so typical of filthy nicotine addicts. Most of them act like the
world is their ash tray.
In article <g2sr28$42b$1@aioe.org>,
"Huge Wad OF Spit" <WannaSwaller@CopenhagenSpat,com > wrote:
> "Shawn Hirn" <srhi@comcast,net > wrote in message
> news:srhi-2964DB.19190112062008@comcast.dca.giganews,com ...
> > In article
> > <db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com >,
> > bldrfish@gmail,com wrote:
> >
> >> On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> >> > Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> >> > Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> >> > most smokers will return to their habit.
> >> >
> >> > http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
> >> >
> >> > Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
> >> >
> >> > It addicts. It addicts strongly.
> >>
> >> I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes. I worked for an
> >> insurance company in the 70's and 80's. People that smoked reigned.
> >> They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. When I found out that
> >> I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
> >> get people to stop smoking during our meetings. Not only did the
> >> smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their cigarettes! I
> >> finally had to leave my job. I once purchased respiratory meds at a
> >> drug store. This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me. He had
> >> his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke. When
> >> I told him, he laughed! I have been able to avoid smoke since I left
> >> the insurance business. Not it is the law and the smokers are fource
> >> out to the outdoor smoking lounge.
> >
> > Smokers are their own worst enemy. If all smokers, not just a minority,
> > would simply treat people the way they want to be treated, all these
> > public smoking bans, such as the new one in Pennsylvania, would never
> > have seen the light of day.
>
> Hey ! Fuck You !
You are so typical of filthy nicotine addicts. Most of them act like the
world is their ash tray.
Re: Pessimistic but true. Horseshit!
<bldrfish@gmail,com > wrote in message
news:db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com ...
On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes.
Oh soo bad huh? what the fuck you doin here?
> I worked for an
>insurance company in the 70's and 80's.
# 1, ...Insurance guy's don't work???
( Fired you for being an asshole huh?)
>People that smoked reigned.
Yep! Still do...
>They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. So use farts like Shame
>him.
>When I found out that
???? Oh big discovery huh?
>I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>get people to stop smoking during our meetings.
Ask if you must... But your a bitcher, the boss saw through you facade
and decided to let you go get a better job Huh?
> Not only did the smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their
> cigarettes!
Sur, Sure,,That's what you say....
>I finally had to leave my job. Quitters never win see Huh?
> I once purchased respiratory meds at a drug store.
( Just 1 time did the trick huh?)
>This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me.
>He had his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke.
>When
>I told him, he laughed!
So give yourself a metal. Pin it to your ass.
> I have been able to avoid smoke since I left the insurance business.
( A bigger crock of shit has never been shot dumb fuck.)
>Not it is the law and the smokers are fource out to the outdoor smoking
>lounge.
There is a cure...Drink you own piss for 7 days.
or
Ok ...then your happy, so quit the bitchin. Go get a fucking life asshole.
Here you candy ass.
Open your mouth sucker. (:>{0} <========
Paahauuktouui !
Living here in the Land of Chaw, its not unusual to run into someone who
Thinks their shit don't stink.
Ha ha! I spit my chaw on you!
"He spat the brownest squirt of tobacco juice I
had ever seen into the mouth of that cry baby.
It looked, in repose, like a map of the continent of Asia,
only upside-down.
Running down the front of his shirt to his pants.
Go have a good cry nah!
<bldrfish@gmail,com > wrote in message
news:db0ca71e-aed6-4cf7-9996-451c74afd01c@34g2000hsf.googlegroups,com ...
On Jun 12, 9:45?am, anon3...@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> Audrey Silk, who heads NYC Citizens Lobbying Against Smoker
> Harassment, says the boost in calls is just a knee-jerk reaction, and
> most smokers will return to their habit.
>
> http :// www .newsday,com /news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny--cigarettetax...
>
> Nicotine is a badly underestimated drug.
>
> It addicts. It addicts strongly.
>I know what it is like to get harrased by cigarettes.
Oh soo bad huh? what the fuck you doin here?
> I worked for an
>insurance company in the 70's and 80's.
# 1, ...Insurance guy's don't work???
( Fired you for being an asshole huh?)
>People that smoked reigned.
Yep! Still do...
>They got their energy from tobacco and coffee. So use farts like Shame
>him.
>When I found out that
???? Oh big discovery huh?
>I was sensitive to cigarette smoke, I asked the manager if he could
>get people to stop smoking during our meetings.
Ask if you must... But your a bitcher, the boss saw through you facade
and decided to let you go get a better job Huh?
> Not only did the smokers not stopped, they harrased me with their
> cigarettes!
Sur, Sure,,That's what you say....
>I finally had to leave my job. Quitters never win see Huh?
> I once purchased respiratory meds at a drug store.
( Just 1 time did the trick huh?)
>This asshole with a cigar was standing behind me.
>He had his rights. I had to get a dose of his second hand cigar smoke.
>When
>I told him, he laughed!
So give yourself a metal. Pin it to your ass.
> I have been able to avoid smoke since I left the insurance business.
( A bigger crock of shit has never been shot dumb fuck.)
>Not it is the law and the smokers are fource out to the outdoor smoking
>lounge.
There is a cure...Drink you own piss for 7 days.
or
Ok ...then your happy, so quit the bitchin. Go get a fucking life asshole.
Here you candy ass.
Open your mouth sucker. (:>{0} <========
Paahauuktouui !
Living here in the Land of Chaw, its not unusual to run into someone who
Thinks their shit don't stink.
Ha ha! I spit my chaw on you!
"He spat the brownest squirt of tobacco juice I
had ever seen into the mouth of that cry baby.
It looked, in repose, like a map of the continent of Asia,
only upside-down.
Running down the front of his shirt to his pants.
Go have a good cry nah!
