Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Two referenda in North Dakota.
Two referenda in North Dakota.
Win one.
Win the other.
http :// www .wday,com /election/
That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
Win one.
Win the other.
http :// www .wday,com /election/
That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
Re: Two referenda in North Dakota.
On 13 Jun 2008 22:05:40 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>Win one.
>
>Win the other.
>
> http :// www .wday,com /election/
It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in North Dakota?
When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from North and South
Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers why, but I knew
what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm too lazy to move.
People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have thought there'd be
fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks stores in ND.
I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's something fishy
going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
On 13 Jun 2008 22:05:40 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>Win one.
>
>Win the other.
>
> http :// www .wday,com /election/
It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in North Dakota?
When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from North and South
Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers why, but I knew
what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm too lazy to move.
People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have thought there'd be
fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks stores in ND.
I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's something fishy
going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
Re: Two referenda in North Dakota.
"Robert" <no@e.mail> wrote in message
>
> It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>
>>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
>
> Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>
>>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
>
> Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in
> North Dakota?
> When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from North
> and South
> Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers
> why, but I knew
> what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm
> too lazy to move.
Or perhaps they are quite happy not to join the rat race that is
Chicago/Detroit/Minneapolis/Etc. Not everybody WANTS to live where and how
you live. Two out of three of the reasons you state above are probably
fairly accurate. I'm just a bit surprised that someone who bases many of his
own arguments on personal choice would find them anything but perfectly
normal and sound choices.
>
> People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have
> thought there'd be
> fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks
> stores in ND.
>
> I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's
> something fishy
> going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
Just when I thought Robert's paranoia couldn't become any more bizarre. :)
"Robert" <no@e.mail> wrote in message
>
> It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>
>>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
>
> Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>
>>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
>
> Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in
> North Dakota?
> When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from North
> and South
> Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers
> why, but I knew
> what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm
> too lazy to move.
Or perhaps they are quite happy not to join the rat race that is
Chicago/Detroit/Minneapolis/Etc. Not everybody WANTS to live where and how
you live. Two out of three of the reasons you state above are probably
fairly accurate. I'm just a bit surprised that someone who bases many of his
own arguments on personal choice would find them anything but perfectly
normal and sound choices.
>
> People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have
> thought there'd be
> fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks
> stores in ND.
>
> I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's
> something fishy
> going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
Just when I thought Robert's paranoia couldn't become any more bizarre. :)
Re: Two referenda in North Dakota.
In article <brc654p4fs6a8d4o4is9mrom7co5hvq22m@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
>On 13 Jun 2008 22:05:40 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>>Win one.
>>
>>Win the other.
>>
>> http :// www .wday,com /election/
>
>It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>
>>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
>
>Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>
>>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
>
>Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in
>North Dakota?
>When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from
>North and South
>Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers
>why, but I knew
>what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm
>too lazy to move.
>
>People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have
>thought there'd be
>fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks
>stores in ND.
>
>I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's
>something fishy
>going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
Sour grapes.
Addict evasion.
Junkie talk.
In article <brc654p4fs6a8d4o4is9mrom7co5hvq22m@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
>On 13 Jun 2008 22:05:40 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
>>Win one.
>>
>>Win the other.
>>
>> http :// www .wday,com /election/
>
>It's all Fargo and West Fargo.
>
>>That represents a quarter of the population in the state.
>
>Meaning the other three quarters do not support a smoking ban.
>
>>That should send a powerful message to the legislature.
>
>Given that people can live anywhere they want, why would ANYone live in
>North Dakota?
>When I was in Minneapolis, I was shocked to see licence plates from
>North and South
>Dakota. I'd never seen them anywhere else. I wanted to ask the drivers
>why, but I knew
>what the answer would be. I was born here. All my friends live here. I'm
>too lazy to move.
>
>People say the same everywhere. It's the human condition, I would have
>thought there'd be
>fewer yuppies in Fargo, but they're everywhere. There are even Starbucks
>stores in ND.
>
>I should be obvious that selling cups of coffee isn't enough. There's
>something fishy
>going on in the back room. Something involvng PODS.
Sour grapes.
Addict evasion.
Junkie talk.
