Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Satisfaction
Satisfaction
These `Super' cigarettes or e-cigarettes are specially designed
smoking sticks that give a smoker the same satisfaction as smoking a
real cigarette, but without the harmful side-effects of a normal
cigarette.
http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
"Satisfaction" as in relieve from nicotine craving.
Because nicotine does nothing except cause craving, which
is addiction.
These `Super' cigarettes or e-cigarettes are specially designed
smoking sticks that give a smoker the same satisfaction as smoking a
real cigarette, but without the harmful side-effects of a normal
cigarette.
http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
"Satisfaction" as in relieve from nicotine craving.
Because nicotine does nothing except cause craving, which
is addiction.
Re: Satisfaction
On 04 Jul 2008 16:31:16 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
"Years ago the British Medical Journal came out with a study on how smoking cuts down life
expectancy of a smoker. In the report, the researchers said every cigarette smoked by a
person robbed him of his life expectancy by 11 minutes. They noted that if a person smoked
5,772 cigarettes on an average in a year - from the age of 17 until his death at 71 - he
would have consumed 311,688 cigarettes. This, they said, would result in losing 6.5 years
of his life expectancy."
Applying their 'scientific' calculation, I died 28.7 years ago.
On 04 Jul 2008 16:31:16 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
> http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
"Years ago the British Medical Journal came out with a study on how smoking cuts down life
expectancy of a smoker. In the report, the researchers said every cigarette smoked by a
person robbed him of his life expectancy by 11 minutes. They noted that if a person smoked
5,772 cigarettes on an average in a year - from the age of 17 until his death at 71 - he
would have consumed 311,688 cigarettes. This, they said, would result in losing 6.5 years
of his life expectancy."
Applying their 'scientific' calculation, I died 28.7 years ago.
Re: Satisfaction
In article <4qtt64pj9r1174sp4vs4haepsorpfo5beh@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
> On 04 Jul 2008 16:31:16 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
> > http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
>
> "Years ago the British Medical Journal came out with a study on how smoking
> cuts down life
> expectancy of a smoker. In the report, the researchers said every cigarette
> smoked by a
> person robbed him of his life expectancy by 11 minutes. They noted that if a
> person smoked
> 5,772 cigarettes on an average in a year - from the age of 17 until his death
> at 71 - he
> would have consumed 311,688 cigarettes. This, they said, would result in
> losing 6.5 years
> of his life expectancy."
>
> Applying their 'scientific' calculation, I died 28.7 years ago.
You totally missed the point that that statement was based on averages.
In article <4qtt64pj9r1174sp4vs4haepsorpfo5beh@4ax,com >,
Robert <no@e.mail> wrote:
> On 04 Jul 2008 16:31:16 GMT, anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net (Bruce Watson) wrote:
>
> > http :// www .xpress4me,com /news/uae/dubai/20008381.html
>
> "Years ago the British Medical Journal came out with a study on how smoking
> cuts down life
> expectancy of a smoker. In the report, the researchers said every cigarette
> smoked by a
> person robbed him of his life expectancy by 11 minutes. They noted that if a
> person smoked
> 5,772 cigarettes on an average in a year - from the age of 17 until his death
> at 71 - he
> would have consumed 311,688 cigarettes. This, they said, would result in
> losing 6.5 years
> of his life expectancy."
>
> Applying their 'scientific' calculation, I died 28.7 years ago.
You totally missed the point that that statement was based on averages.
Re: Satisfaction
Troll "Twinkie" Shane <s...@DOOFUS,net > wrote:
>
> You totally missed the point that that statement was based on averages.
That's good work, Twinkie! With your impeccable logic, highly
developed skills in conceptual thinking, and razor sharp mind, you can
keep us straight on what we are failing to understand relative to the
grandiloquent input provided by your fellow idiot trolls. It will
always be comforting to The BIG N just knowing that you will be out
their help us clarify any cut and pasting that may be offered by those
deep thinking morons who are your sisters-in-arms. Keep up the good
work,you mental giant you. And while you're at it, have ya' self a
twinkie on The BIG N. LOL!
Troll "Twinkie" Shane <s...@DOOFUS,net > wrote:
>
> You totally missed the point that that statement was based on averages.
That's good work, Twinkie! With your impeccable logic, highly
developed skills in conceptual thinking, and razor sharp mind, you can
keep us straight on what we are failing to understand relative to the
grandiloquent input provided by your fellow idiot trolls. It will
always be comforting to The BIG N just knowing that you will be out
their help us clarify any cut and pasting that may be offered by those
deep thinking morons who are your sisters-in-arms. Keep up the good
work,you mental giant you. And while you're at it, have ya' self a
twinkie on The BIG N. LOL!
Re: Oral Satisfaction
The BIG N wrote:
> Troll "Twinkie" Shane <s...@DOOFUS,net > wrote:
>
>>
>> You totally missed the point that that statement was based on
>> averages.
>
> That's good work, Twinkie! With your impeccable logic, highly
> developed skills in conceptual thinking, and razor sharp mind, you can
> keep us straight on what we are failing to understand relative to the
> grandiloquent input provided by your fellow idiot trolls. It will
> always be comforting to The BIG N just knowing that you will be out
> their help us clarify any cut and pasting that may be offered by those
> deep thinking morons who are your sisters-in-arms. Keep up the good
> work,you mental giant you. And while you're at it, have ya' self a
> twinkie on The BIG N. LOL!
It's time for you to suck suck suuuuuuck again, isn't it addict?
The BIG N wrote:
> Troll "Twinkie" Shane <s...@DOOFUS,net > wrote:
>
>>
>> You totally missed the point that that statement was based on
>> averages.
>
> That's good work, Twinkie! With your impeccable logic, highly
> developed skills in conceptual thinking, and razor sharp mind, you can
> keep us straight on what we are failing to understand relative to the
> grandiloquent input provided by your fellow idiot trolls. It will
> always be comforting to The BIG N just knowing that you will be out
> their help us clarify any cut and pasting that may be offered by those
> deep thinking morons who are your sisters-in-arms. Keep up the good
> work,you mental giant you. And while you're at it, have ya' self a
> twinkie on The BIG N. LOL!
It's time for you to suck suck suuuuuuck again, isn't it addict?
