Group: alt.smokers

Puffing on tobacco.

Add group to favorites Add group to favorites
   indietro Back to post list     indietro Send new message to group
Search:
Pg.
3

Post Subject:

smoking as religion

Reply from: Reality_Check
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 22:22
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !


"Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
news:RUMgk.30247$E41.6298@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>
>
> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check,it > wrote in message
> news:6ehh1kF6u3aqU1@mid.individual,net ...
>>
>> "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
>> news:pPLgk.30213$E41.18074@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net > wrote in message
>>> news:1216579492.711245@irys.nyx,net ...
>>>> In article <g5vvuk$5mg$1@news.albasani,net >,
>>>> Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail,com > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>Him? Dunno. Doesn't suck to be me, despite being a smoker. I don't
>>>>>force my habits on others, I smoke away from areas where others
>>>>>congregate, I apply basic social grace to the matter.
>>>>>
>>>>>On the other hand, I also occasionally see some jerkwad who goes out of
>>>>>their way to walk close by and do the "critiquing cough" thing or some
>>>>>equivalent. To those I say look, you can simply stop breathing while I
>>>>>smoke and it won't bother me one bit.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, you're not doing enough to "smoke away from
>>>> areas where others congregate." Try harder. Go farther
>>>> away. Far enough so that no one can go "out of their way
>>>> to walk close by."
>>>
>>> And do the same with your cars, barbeques, candles, fireworks etc.
>>
>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>> that so, then let us know.
>>
>
> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
> smoking outside.

Are you naturally stupid, or do you have to practice ?

>
> Not enough folks are as stupidly deranged as you, apparently.

God damn boy, you are one stump-stupid deluded imbecile.

Outdoor smoking bans
Smoking has been banned on the streets of Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward since October
2002. Ward employees patrol the streets and fine violators ¥2000. According
to the cigarette company Japan Tobacco, Inc., 60 municipalities, whose
residents comprise 10% of Japan's population, have regulations to ban or
discourage smoking on the street. Only three municipalities assess fines for
violations.

In April 2007 the City of Burbank, California joined Calabasas and Santa
Monica in restricting smoking in public places [3]. The Secondhand Smoke
Control Ordinance was supported by Mayor Todd Campbell, Jef Vander Borght
and Marsha Ramos following independent requests by 2 Burbank residents, Eric
Michael Cap & Robert Phipps Esq.[4] In May, 2007 the City of Beverly Hills
voted to ban smoking in all outdoor dining areas, effective October 1, 2007
[5]. Numerous other cities have since initiated their own public smoking
restrictions, including Baldwin Park, Belmont and South Pasadena. The City
of Los Angeles has banned smoking in its Parks following the 2007 Griffith
Park fire, started by a smoker.

In February 2008, the Hawaii County Council voted to ban smoking at county
recreation facilities on the island of Hawaii.[37] Mayor Harry Kim expressed
concerns over the bill's failure to allow designated smoking areas,[38] and
ultimately vetoed the bill. On April 22, 2008, the Council overrode his veto
by a 7-2 vote, and smoking was banned in all county recreation facilities,
including beach parks, rodeo arenas and the Hilo drag strip.


>
>>> Also dogs, since their droppings can cause dangerous infections.
>>
>> Well then stop eating them.
>>
>
> Idiot.
>
>>>
>>> If you have a cold, don't leave the house please, as you may infect
>>> others with your virus.
>>
>> </smoker arrogance on>
>> Fuck you, stay away from my infectious disease if you don't like it
>> </smoker arrogance off>
>>
>
> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>
> I don't like it, so you can't do it.
> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>

Pay attention tobacco-sucker - We don't care about the harm an individual
does to THEMSELVES, you pathetic addict.

We don't care that you suck suck suck on your carcinogenic drugs
every day, what I've stated before many times, yet you lying tobacco addicts
continue to ignore, is that I WANT YOU TO SMOKE, I want you to
smoke even more than you do now, increase your level of pathetic
addiction 3x the current level, I think find it humorous to watch you
lowlifes poison YOURSELVES, and I make $$ every time you
suck suck suck on your wretched tobacco, so please do fire another one
up for me, and think of me as you suck it down deep inside.


What you drug-addled lying lowlife scumbags need to remember
is that society is prohibiting your PUBLIC BURNING of Tobacco,
and not because we give a flying fuck about YOUR health, jackass.
We are outlawing your PUBLIC BURNING of tobacco for OUR
OWN BENEFIT. You are free to suck suck suck and burn as much
of your putrid wretched drug in the PRIVACY of your own stinky
abode as you so desire, I don't even care if you poison your own
family, wife, children and infants with your toxic puke. You are
even free to ingest your wretched tobacco IN PUBLIC if you pig-ignorant
lowlife losers could comprehend some other method of ingestion
BESIDES OPEN BURNING, moron. You are free, even under
the current legal bans, to chew and SWALLOW as much tobacco
as you can cram in your lying tumorous maws, you are free to snort up big
gagging lines of snuff in public until your melanoma rotted
nose is packed full, you are free to cram an entire pound of
fire-cured plug cut Cavendish up your distended polyped ass and
visit any of those public places, you can even inject a bolus of pure
nicotine directly into your Jugular -- NO ONE GIVES A FUCK
what you do to YOURSELVES, addict.


What you can't do is OPENLY BURN your putrid noxious drug
in public.



Any questions, jackass?



>
>
>
>>>
>>> Or we could all just agree not to be stupid, and have a mutual respect
>>> for each other's freedoms.
>>
>> You have no "freedom" to harm other people, never did, never will.
>>
>
> Prove it harms you more than passive inhalation of BBQ smoke, bonfire
> smoke etc.
>
> Oh that's right, you can't.

We don't have to prove it's MORE harmful than other dangers, you
pig-ignorant stammering
imbecile.

>
>> Got it, asswipe?
>>
>
> Evidently I have a far better grasp than you.

Then grasp yer cheeks and git packin', asswipe.




Reply from: Pink Freud
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 22:29
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !



"Reality Check©" <Reality@Check,it > wrote in message
news:6ehl4fF75b4rU1@mid.individual,net ...
>
> "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
> news:RUMgk.30247$E41.6298@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>>
>>
>> "Reality Check©" <Reality@Check,it > wrote in message
>> news:6ehh1kF6u3aqU1@mid.individual,net ...
>>>
>>> "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
>>> news:pPLgk.30213$E41.18074@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net > wrote in message
>>>> news:1216579492.711245@irys.nyx,net ...
>>>>> In article <g5vvuk$5mg$1@news.albasani,net >,
>>>>> Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail,com > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Him? Dunno. Doesn't suck to be me, despite being a smoker. I don't
>>>>>>force my habits on others, I smoke away from areas where others
>>>>>>congregate, I apply basic social grace to the matter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On the other hand, I also occasionally see some jerkwad who goes out
>>>>>>of
>>>>>>their way to walk close by and do the "critiquing cough" thing or some
>>>>>>equivalent. To those I say look, you can simply stop breathing while
>>>>>>I
>>>>>>smoke and it won't bother me one bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously, you're not doing enough to "smoke away from
>>>>> areas where others congregate." Try harder. Go farther
>>>>> away. Far enough so that no one can go "out of their way
>>>>> to walk close by."
>>>>
>>>> And do the same with your cars, barbeques, candles, fireworks etc.
>>>
>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>
>>
>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>> smoking outside.
>
> Are you naturally stupid, or do you have to practice ?
>
>>
>> Not enough folks are as stupidly deranged as you, apparently.
>
> God damn boy, you are one stump-stupid deluded imbecile.
>
> Outdoor smoking bans
> Smoking has been banned on the streets of Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward since
> October 2002. Ward employees patrol the streets and fine violators ¥2000.
> According to the cigarette company Japan Tobacco, Inc., 60 municipalities,
> whose residents comprise 10% of Japan's population, have regulations to
> ban or discourage smoking on the street. Only three municipalities assess
> fines for violations.
>
> In April 2007 the City of Burbank, California joined Calabasas and Santa
> Monica in restricting smoking in public places [3]. The Secondhand Smoke
> Control Ordinance was supported by Mayor Todd Campbell, Jef Vander Borght
> and Marsha Ramos following independent requests by 2 Burbank residents,
> Eric Michael Cap & Robert Phipps Esq.[4] In May, 2007 the City of Beverly
> Hills voted to ban smoking in all outdoor dining areas, effective October
> 1, 2007 [5]. Numerous other cities have since initiated their own public
> smoking restrictions, including Baldwin Park, Belmont and South Pasadena.
> The City of Los Angeles has banned smoking in its Parks following the 2007
> Griffith Park fire, started by a smoker.
>
> In February 2008, the Hawaii County Council voted to ban smoking at county
> recreation facilities on the island of Hawaii.[37] Mayor Harry Kim
> expressed concerns over the bill's failure to allow designated smoking
> areas,[38] and ultimately vetoed the bill. On April 22, 2008, the Council
> overrode his veto by a 7-2 vote, and smoking was banned in all county
> recreation facilities, including beach parks, rodeo arenas and the Hilo
> drag strip.
>
>
>>
>>>> Also dogs, since their droppings can cause dangerous infections.
>>>
>>> Well then stop eating them.
>>>
>>
>> Idiot.
>>
>>>>
>>>> If you have a cold, don't leave the house please, as you may infect
>>>> others with your virus.
>>>
>>> </smoker arrogance on>
>>> Fuck you, stay away from my infectious disease if you don't like it
>>> </smoker arrogance off>
>>>
>>
>> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>
>> I don't like it, so you can't do it.
>> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>
>
> Pay attention tobacco-sucker - We don't care about the harm an individual
> does to THEMSELVES, you pathetic addict.
>
> We don't care that you suck suck suck on your carcinogenic drugs
> every day, what I've stated before many times, yet you lying tobacco
> addicts
> continue to ignore, is that I WANT YOU TO SMOKE, I want you to
> smoke even more than you do now, increase your level of pathetic
> addiction 3x the current level, I think find it humorous to watch you
> lowlifes poison YOURSELVES, and I make $$ every time you
> suck suck suck on your wretched tobacco, so please do fire another one
> up for me, and think of me as you suck it down deep inside.
>
>
> What you drug-addled lying lowlife scumbags need to remember
> is that society is prohibiting your PUBLIC BURNING of Tobacco,
> and not because we give a flying fuck about YOUR health, jackass.
> We are outlawing your PUBLIC BURNING of tobacco for OUR
> OWN BENEFIT. You are free to suck suck suck and burn as much
> of your putrid wretched drug in the PRIVACY of your own stinky
> abode as you so desire, I don't even care if you poison your own
> family, wife, children and infants with your toxic puke. You are
> even free to ingest your wretched tobacco IN PUBLIC if you pig-ignorant
> lowlife losers could comprehend some other method of ingestion
> BESIDES OPEN BURNING, moron. You are free, even under
> the current legal bans, to chew and SWALLOW as much tobacco
> as you can cram in your lying tumorous maws, you are free to snort up big
> gagging lines of snuff in public until your melanoma rotted
> nose is packed full, you are free to cram an entire pound of
> fire-cured plug cut Cavendish up your distended polyped ass and
> visit any of those public places, you can even inject a bolus of pure
> nicotine directly into your Jugular -- NO ONE GIVES A FUCK
> what you do to YOURSELVES, addict.
>
>
> What you can't do is OPENLY BURN your putrid noxious drug
> in public.
>
>
>
> Any questions, jackass?
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> Or we could all just agree not to be stupid, and have a mutual respect
>>>> for each other's freedoms.
>>>
>>> You have no "freedom" to harm other people, never did, never will.
>>>
>>
>> Prove it harms you more than passive inhalation of BBQ smoke, bonfire
>> smoke etc.
>>
>> Oh that's right, you can't.
>
> We don't have to prove it's MORE harmful than other dangers, you
> pig-ignorant stammering
> imbecile.

Of course you do.

>
>>
>>> Got it, asswipe?
>>>
>>
>> Evidently I have a far better grasp than you.
>
> Then grasp yer cheeks and git packin', asswipe.
>
>
>

It's a lot clearer now, thanks. You're obviously certifiably insane.

Go fuck yourself.
Move to Singapore or something, I imagine you'll love it there.
They're a bunch of nazi control freaks too.


--

----------------------------------------------------------
Pink Freud, Dark Side Of The Couch
----------------------------------------------------------
"When I die, I want to pass away peacefully in my sleep, like my uncle
Derek, and not crying and screaming, like the passengers in his car."


Reply from: Reality_Check
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 22:35
Re: Pink Freud PUNKs himself in public ... again!


"Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
news:OeNgk.30260$E41.18468@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>
>
> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check,it > wrote in message
> news:6ehl4fF75b4rU1@mid.individual,net ...
>>
>> "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
>> news:RUMgk.30247$E41.6298@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Reality_Check©" <Reality@Check,it > wrote in message
>>> news:6ehh1kF6u3aqU1@mid.individual,net ...
>>>>
>>>> "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote in message
>>>> news:pPLgk.30213$E41.18074@text.news.virginmedia,com ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Bruce Watson" <anon3c67@nyx.nyx,net > wrote in message
>>>>> news:1216579492.711245@irys.nyx,net ...
>>>>>> In article <g5vvuk$5mg$1@news.albasani,net >,
>>>>>> Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail,com > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Him? Dunno. Doesn't suck to be me, despite being a smoker. I don't
>>>>>>>force my habits on others, I smoke away from areas where others
>>>>>>>congregate, I apply basic social grace to the matter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On the other hand, I also occasionally see some jerkwad who goes out
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>their way to walk close by and do the "critiquing cough" thing or
>>>>>>>some
>>>>>>>equivalent. To those I say look, you can simply stop breathing while
>>>>>>>I
>>>>>>>smoke and it won't bother me one bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Obviously, you're not doing enough to "smoke away from
>>>>>> areas where others congregate." Try harder. Go farther
>>>>>> away. Far enough so that no one can go "out of their way
>>>>>> to walk close by."
>>>>>
>>>>> And do the same with your cars, barbeques, candles, fireworks etc.
>>>>
>>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>>> smoking outside.
>>
>> Are you naturally stupid, or do you have to practice ?
>>
>>>
>>> Not enough folks are as stupidly deranged as you, apparently.
>>
>> God damn boy, you are one stump-stupid deluded imbecile.
>>
>> Outdoor smoking bans
>> Smoking has been banned on the streets of Tokyo's Chiyoda Ward since
>> October 2002. Ward employees patrol the streets and fine violators ¥2000.
>> According to the cigarette company Japan Tobacco, Inc., 60
>> municipalities, whose residents comprise 10% of Japan's population, have
>> regulations to ban or discourage smoking on the street. Only three
>> municipalities assess fines for violations.
>>
>> In April 2007 the City of Burbank, California joined Calabasas and Santa
>> Monica in restricting smoking in public places [3]. The Secondhand Smoke
>> Control Ordinance was supported by Mayor Todd Campbell, Jef Vander Borght
>> and Marsha Ramos following independent requests by 2 Burbank residents,
>> Eric Michael Cap & Robert Phipps Esq.[4] In May, 2007 the City of Beverly
>> Hills voted to ban smoking in all outdoor dining areas, effective October
>> 1, 2007 [5]. Numerous other cities have since initiated their own public
>> smoking restrictions, including Baldwin Park, Belmont and South Pasadena.
>> The City of Los Angeles has banned smoking in its Parks following the
>> 2007 Griffith Park fire, started by a smoker.
>>
>> In February 2008, the Hawaii County Council voted to ban smoking at
>> county recreation facilities on the island of Hawaii.[37] Mayor Harry Kim
>> expressed concerns over the bill's failure to allow designated smoking
>> areas,[38] and ultimately vetoed the bill. On April 22, 2008, the Council
>> overrode his veto by a 7-2 vote, and smoking was banned in all county
>> recreation facilities, including beach parks, rodeo arenas and the Hilo
>> drag strip.
>>

Try some lube next time you ram your own stupidity and ignorance
up your ass, moron.


>>
>>>
>>>>> Also dogs, since their droppings can cause dangerous infections.
>>>>
>>>> Well then stop eating them.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Idiot.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you have a cold, don't leave the house please, as you may infect
>>>>> others with your virus.
>>>>
>>>> </smoker arrogance on>
>>>> Fuck you, stay away from my infectious disease if you don't like it
>>>> </smoker arrogance off>
>>>>
>>>
>>> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>
>>> I don't like it, so you can't do it.
>>> </sanctimonious non-smoker arrogance on>
>>
>> Pay attention tobacco-sucker - We don't care about the harm an individual
>> does to THEMSELVES, you pathetic addict.
>>
>> We don't care that you suck suck suck on your carcinogenic drugs
>> every day, what I've stated before many times, yet you lying tobacco
>> addicts
>> continue to ignore, is that I WANT YOU TO SMOKE, I want you to
>> smoke even more than you do now, increase your level of pathetic
>> addiction 3x the current level, I think find it humorous to watch you
>> lowlifes poison YOURSELVES, and I make $$ every time you
>> suck suck suck on your wretched tobacco, so please do fire another one
>> up for me, and think of me as you suck it down deep inside.
>>
>>
>> What you drug-addled lying lowlife scumbags need to remember
>> is that society is prohibiting your PUBLIC BURNING of Tobacco,
>> and not because we give a flying fuck about YOUR health, jackass.
>> We are outlawing your PUBLIC BURNING of tobacco for OUR
>> OWN BENEFIT. You are free to suck suck suck and burn as much
>> of your putrid wretched drug in the PRIVACY of your own stinky
>> abode as you so desire, I don't even care if you poison your own
>> family, wife, children and infants with your toxic puke. You are
>> even free to ingest your wretched tobacco IN PUBLIC if you pig-ignorant
>> lowlife losers could comprehend some other method of ingestion
>> BESIDES OPEN BURNING, moron. You are free, even under
>> the current legal bans, to chew and SWALLOW as much tobacco
>> as you can cram in your lying tumorous maws, you are free to snort up big
>> gagging lines of snuff in public until your melanoma rotted
>> nose is packed full, you are free to cram an entire pound of
>> fire-cured plug cut Cavendish up your distended polyped ass and
>> visit any of those public places, you can even inject a bolus of pure
>> nicotine directly into your Jugular -- NO ONE GIVES A FUCK
>> what you do to YOURSELVES, addict.
>>
>>
>> What you can't do is OPENLY BURN your putrid noxious drug
>> in public.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any questions, jackass?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Or we could all just agree not to be stupid, and have a mutual respect
>>>>> for each other's freedoms.
>>>>
>>>> You have no "freedom" to harm other people, never did, never will.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Prove it harms you more than passive inhalation of BBQ smoke, bonfire
>>> smoke etc.
>>>
>>> Oh that's right, you can't.
>>
>> We don't have to prove it's MORE harmful than other dangers, you
>> pig-ignorant stammering
>> imbecile.
>
> Of course you do.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Got it, asswipe?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Evidently I have a far better grasp than you.
>>
>> Then grasp yer cheeks and git packin', asswipe.
>>
>>
>>
>
> It's a lot clearer now, thanks. You're obviously certifiably insane.
>
> Go fuck yourself.
> Move to Singapore or something, I imagine you'll love it there.
> They're a bunch of nazi control freaks too.

Naw, much more fun to kick you lowlife tobacco-sucking asswipes
to the cesspool of society. We'll stay here and enjoy the view... and
the cleaner air.





Reply from: John Baker
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 18:21
Re: Pink Freud PUNKs himself in public ... again!

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:35:41 -0600, "Reality Check©"
<Reality@Check,it > wrote:
>>>
>
>Try some lube next time you ram your own stupidity and ignorance
>up your ass, moron.


Projection noted, imbecile.


<PLONK!>



Reply from: _ Prof. Jonez _
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 23:42
Re: Pink Freud PUNKs himself in public ... again!

John Baker wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 14:35:41 -0600, "Reality_Check©"
> <Reality@Check,it > wrote:
>>>>
>>
>> Try some lube next time you ram your own stupidity and ignorance
>> up your ass, moron.
>
>
> Projection noted, imbecile.
>
>
> <PLONK!>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The sound of your brain hitting the toilet water in the morning ...




Reply from: Uncle Vic
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 23:07
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

One fine day in alt.atheism, "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote:

>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>> that so, then let us know.
>>
>
> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
> smoking outside.
>

The tobacco lobby is probably the most powerful lobby on the hill. Imagine
the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.



--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Separator of Church and Reason.
Convicted by Earthquack.



Reply from: _ Prof. Jonez _
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 23:52
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

Uncle Vic wrote:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote:
>
>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>
>>
>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>> smoking outside.
>>
>
> The tobacco lobby is probably the most powerful lobby on the hill.
> Imagine the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.

Imagine if a pathetic tobacco-sucker like you had a clue?




Reply from: Uncle Vic
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 01:18
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

One fine day in alt.atheism, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez,net > wrote:

> Uncle Vic wrote:
>> One fine day in alt.atheism, "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote:
>>
>>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>>> smoking outside.
>>>
>>
>> The tobacco lobby is probably the most powerful lobby on the hill.
>> Imagine the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.
>
> Imagine if a pathetic tobacco-sucker like you had a clue?
>
>
>

Go away little boy, the adults are talking here.

--
Uncle Vic
aa Atheist #2011
Separator of Church and Reason.
Convicted by Earthquack.



Reply from: atheist@home,com
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 02:23
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:18:11 GMT, Uncle Vic <address@withheld,com >
wrote:

>One fine day in alt.atheism, "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez,net > wrote:
>
>> Uncle Vic wrote:
>>> One fine day in alt.atheism, "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>>>> smoking outside.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The tobacco lobby is probably the most powerful lobby on the hill.
>>> Imagine the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.
>>
>> Imagine if a pathetic tobacco-sucker like you had a clue?
>>
>>
>>
>
>Go away little boy, the adults are talking here.

Lol!
Where did you find this guy?

atheist@home#1554

Reply from: Brian E. Clark
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 23:39
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

In article <Xns9AE1A5E42AF0Cvicman@207.115.17.102>,
Uncle Vic said...

> Go away little boy, the adults are talking here.

Hey, I grant that the guy is annoying, but let's not
lie to ourselves about ourselves. ;-)

--
-----------
Brian E. Clark


Reply from: Reality_Check
Date: 22 Jul 2008, 02:57
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !


"Brian E. Clark" <reply@newsgroup.only.please> wrote in message
news:MPG.22eecc19ab6f907498b4fc@newsgroups,com cast,net ...
> In article <Xns9AE1A5E42AF0Cvicman@207.115.17.102>,
> Uncle Vic said...
>
>> Go away little boy, the adults are talking here.
>
> Hey, I grant that the guy is annoying, but let's not
> lie to ourselves about ourselves. ;-)

Denial -- it's what drug addicts do best.




Reply from: Ken Dixon
Date: 20 Jul 2008, 23:57
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

Uncle Vic wrote:
> One fine day in alt.atheism, "Pink Freud" <somewhere@here,com > wrote:
>
>>> Well, when you get enough people together to pass laws making
>>> that so, then let us know.
>>>
>> I won't, and neither will you get enough people to pass laws against
>> smoking outside.
>>
>
> The tobacco lobby is probably the most powerful lobby on the hill. Imagine
> the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.

Actually that would be the AARP.
http :// money.cnn,com /magazines/fortune/fortune archive/1997/12/08/234927/index.htm

Reply from: Bruce Watson
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 01:58
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

In article <Xns9AE18FB5CD89Bvicman@207.115.17.102>,
Uncle Vic <address@withheld,com > wrote:

>Imagine the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.

Imagine the jonesing the addicts would go through.

Nicotine addicts think they're a big contributor to the economy but
they also think they get pleasure from a drug that does nothing
but cause them to take more of it.

Reply from: _ Prof. Jonez _
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 03:30
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

Bruce Watson wrote:
> In article <Xns9AE18FB5CD89Bvicman@207.115.17.102>,
> Uncle Vic <address@withheld,com > wrote:
>
>> Imagine the hit our economy would take if tobacco was made illegal.
>
> Imagine the jonesing the addicts would go through.
>
> Nicotine addicts think they're a big contributor to the economy but
> they also think they get pleasure from a drug that does nothing
> but cause them to take more of it.

Stupid is as Stupid does.




Reply from: Kelsey Bjarnason
Date: 21 Jul 2008, 19:16
Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !

[snips]

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:12:52 -0600, Reality_Check© wrote:

>> Or we could all just agree not to be stupid, and have a mutual respect
>> for each other's freedoms.
>
> You have no "freedom" to harm other people, never did, never will.
>
> Got it, asswipe?

I assume, based on this, you're actively working on banning all internal
combustion vehicles, coal-power plants, anything whatsoever which
pollutes in any manner - and you would *never* do anything so crass as to
drive a car or even take a bus, right? These things do, after all, spew
noxious fumes and thus cause or risk causing harm to others.

And you *do* make sure that none of the household power you use comes
from anything other than air, solar, water and geothermal sources,
right? Right?

You wouldn't want to be a hypocrite after all.



Pg.
3



Login:
  Username:    Password: 
 
   Lost Password? click here!
Thread:
     Cup O' Joes
      Mike
      not much of anyone
       Cup O' Joes
        _ Prof. Jonez _
         not much of anyone
   randyw
     Reality_Check
      John Baker
       Reality_Check
        Uncle Vic
         Reality_Check
          not much of anyone
      Pink Freud
       Reality_Check
        Pink Freud
         Reality_Check
          Kelsey Bjarnason
           Bruce Watson
            Pink Freud
             Reality_Check
              Pink Freud
               Reality_Check
                Pink Freud
                 Reality_Check
                  John Baker
                   _ Prof. Jonez _
               Uncle Vic
                _ Prof. Jonez _
                 Uncle Vic
                  atheist@home,com
                  Brian E. Clark
                   Reality_Check
                Ken Dixon
                Bruce Watson
                 _ Prof. Jonez _
              Kelsey Bjarnason
               Bruce Watson
                Mark K. Bilbo
                 _ Prof. Jonez _
             casket_key@yahoo,com
            L. Raymond
             Bruce Watson
              John Baker
              Uncle Vic
               Reality_Check
                Pink Freud
                Richard Evans
                 _ Prof. Jonez _
                  atheist@home,com