Re: smoking as a pathetic drug addiction !
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gmail@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:mnuol5-f61.ln1@75-104-203-60.cust.wildblue,net ...
> atheist@home,com wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:49:22 +0100, "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "L. Raymond" <badaddress@...,com > wrote in message
>>> news:3wjju2xpa10g$.yhbmgn8zjai9$.dlg@40tude,net ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> The big problem with these people is that they turn smoking into a
>>>> moral
>>>> issue, and that is how they justify their rude and childish behavior.
>>>> It's amazing how everyone is suddenly an expert on etiquette when the
>>>> issue is one that makes them feel smug.
>>> As a cigar smoker and a practising atheist, I do believe ... in human
>>> behaviour. Having successfully set up and refined a whole raft of moral
>>> and other arguments (notably "public health") it is simply inevitable
>>> that the very same techniques will now be extended to a range of other
>>> activities and pleasures, many of which are currently enjoyed by the
>>> anti-smoking crowd. It is already beginning with food (fat, salt, sugar,
>>> additives!), and I can see a very good case for alcohol and even sports.
>>> It fills me with no little glee to anticipate how these self-righteous
>>> twits will scream and howl as their own pastimes and pleasures come
>>> under scrutiny and censure. "But this is completely different, " they
>>> will wail ... but in the end, they will face the exact same fate as the
>>> smoker. Cosmic karma in action. It's enough to make me feel quite
>>> smug.
>>
>> http :// tinyurl,com /5sowls
>>
>> Gonna get worse.
>> Shouldn't be long before they are telling us what sort of clothing to
>> wear.
>> All gray.
>
> Nah, bright yellow.
>
> (Shows up better in satellite pix)
Prison-style jumpsuits won't be necessary, as they do not affect the
performance of our implanted GPS and ID chips.