Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Buckethead video
Buckethead video
I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
Enjoy!
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
Enjoy!
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
Re: Buckethead video
<BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>
> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
> Enjoy!
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
Buckethead sucks.
winnard
<BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>
> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
> Enjoy!
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
Buckethead sucks.
winnard
Re: Buckethead video
On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>
> Buckethead sucks.
>
>
>winnard
Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
Jim
>
On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>
> Buckethead sucks.
>
>
>winnard
Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
Jim
>
Re: Buckethead video
> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Buckethead sucks.
> >
> >
> >winnard
>
> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
> Jim
> >
>
Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
even remotely considered a well constructed song.
Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey - it's
about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah blah)
Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
known as music.
peace out.
> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Buckethead sucks.
> >
> >
> >winnard
>
> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
> Jim
> >
>
Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
even remotely considered a well constructed song.
Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey - it's
about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah blah)
Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
known as music.
peace out.
Re: Buckethead video
Squier wrote:
>> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Buckethead sucks.
>>>
>>>
>>> winnard
>> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> Jim
>
>
> Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>
> But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>
> Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>
> I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey - it's
> about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah blah)
> Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
>
> peace out.
;-) mvm
Squier wrote:
>> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Buckethead sucks.
>>>
>>>
>>> winnard
>> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> Jim
>
>
> Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>
> But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>
> Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>
> I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey - it's
> about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah blah)
> Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
>
> peace out.
;-) mvm
Re: Buckethead video
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote
> Buckethead is a supreme technician.
Amen.
> Definitely not a song writer.
Amen.
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
Amen, brother.
Buckethead is a damn freakshow and that's exactly what he wants, so he is
successful as hell.
Plus, there's no way some of the stuff he does on guitar can be done, yet he
does it...and is able to repeat it.
He is fargin' amazing...if I had his technical skill I would be the biggest
name in rock.
Peace,
Polfus
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote
> Buckethead is a supreme technician.
Amen.
> Definitely not a song writer.
Amen.
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
Amen, brother.
Buckethead is a damn freakshow and that's exactly what he wants, so he is
successful as hell.
Plus, there's no way some of the stuff he does on guitar can be done, yet he
does it...and is able to repeat it.
He is fargin' amazing...if I had his technical skill I would be the biggest
name in rock.
Peace,
Polfus
Re: Buckethead video
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
>> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Buckethead sucks.
>> >
>> >
>> >winnard
>>
>> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> Jim
>> >
>>
>
>
> Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>
> But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>
> Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>
> I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
> it's
> about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah
> blah)
> Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
>
> peace out.
squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great posts
that contain good insites
But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can say
is:
Buckethead Sucks!!!!
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
>> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Buckethead sucks.
>> >
>> >
>> >winnard
>>
>> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> Jim
>> >
>>
>
>
> Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>
> But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>
> Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>
> I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
> it's
> about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah
> blah)
> Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>
> I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> known as music.
>
> peace out.
squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great posts
that contain good insites
But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can say
is:
Buckethead Sucks!!!!
Re: Buckethead video
> Lee Waun <leewaun@telus . net > wrote:
> "Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
> news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
> >> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Buckethead sucks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >winnard
> >>
> >> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> >> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
> >> Jim
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> > Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> > use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> > types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> > gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
> >
> > But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> > even remotely considered a well constructed song.
> >
> > Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> > is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> > tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
> >
> > I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> > to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> > or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> > are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> > to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> > apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
> > it's
> > about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah
> > blah)
> > Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
> >
> > I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> > to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> > of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> > in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> > known as music.
> >
> > peace out.
>
> squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great posts
> that contain good insites
>
> But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can say
> is:
>
>
> Buckethead Sucks!!!!
>
>
heh. well I guess you don't like him much ;)
you're cool person too. You always say how you feel
and tell it straight up. props to you.
Yeah - a lot of people have no interest in the bucketman
and I can definitely understand why.
take care.
> Lee Waun <leewaun@telus . net > wrote:
> "Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
> news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
> >> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Buckethead sucks.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >winnard
> >>
> >> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> >> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
> >> Jim
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
> > Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
> > use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
> > types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
> > gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
> >
> > But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
> > even remotely considered a well constructed song.
> >
> > Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
> > is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
> > tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
> >
> > I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
> > to be respected even though it might not be something you would purchase
> > or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
> > are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too swelled
> > to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song. (although
> > apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
> > it's
> > about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it.. blah
> > blah)
> > Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
> >
> > I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
> > to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
> > of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
> > in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
> > known as music.
> >
> > peace out.
>
> squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great posts
> that contain good insites
>
> But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can say
> is:
>
>
> Buckethead Sucks!!!!
>
>
heh. well I guess you don't like him much ;)
you're cool person too. You always say how you feel
and tell it straight up. props to you.
Yeah - a lot of people have no interest in the bucketman
and I can definitely understand why.
take care.
Re: Buckethead video
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
news:090520081651577761%squier@strats . net ...
>> Lee Waun <leewaun@telus . net > wrote:
>
>> "Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
>> news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
>> >> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Buckethead sucks.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >winnard
>> >>
>> >> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> >> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> >> Jim
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
>> > Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
>> > use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
>> > types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
>> > gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>> >
>> > But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
>> > even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>> >
>> > Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
>> > is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
>> > tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>> >
>> > I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
>> > to be respected even though it might not be something you would
>> > purchase
>> > or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
>> > are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too
>> > swelled
>> > to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song.
>> > (although
>> > apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
>> > it's
>> > about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it..
>> > blah
>> > blah)
>> > Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>> >
>> > I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
>> > to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
>> > of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
>> > in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
>> > known as music.
>> >
>> > peace out.
>>
>> squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great
>> posts
>> that contain good insites
>>
>> But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can
>> say
>> is:
>>
>>
>> Buckethead Sucks!!!!
>>
>>
>
> heh. well I guess you don't like him much ;)
>
> you're cool person too. You always say how you feel
> and tell it straight up. props to you.
>
> Yeah - a lot of people have no interest in the bucketman
> and I can definitely understand why.
>
> take care.
You know I love KFC and that is what I always see him wearing. A KFC bucket
and I guess I am just jealous of how he has so much KFC and I don't.
Guess it is just KFC envy mostly.
"Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
news:090520081651577761%squier@strats . net ...
>> Lee Waun <leewaun@telus . net > wrote:
>
>> "Squier" <squier@strats . net > wrote in message
>> news:080520081917510449%squier@strats . net ...
>> >> mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:11:46 -0500, "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Buckethead sucks.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >winnard
>> >>
>> >> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
>> >> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
>> >> Jim
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Buckethead is a supreme technician. Definitely not a song writer.
>> > Al DiMeola could also be in this camp although he can actually
>> > use a much more diverse variety of techniques to play many more
>> > types of music than Buckhead. And every once in a while Al actually
>> > gets some soul and can write (and obviously play) great songs.
>> >
>> > But it's all about technical skills rather than writing anything
>> > even remotely considered a well constructed song.
>> >
>> > Some people say that writing songs is overrated and to them it really
>> > is all about endless technical jamming. In fact if you even start to
>> > tap your feet to a song then its considered pop schlock.
>> >
>> > I'm not in this particular camp - but technical mastery is something
>> > to be respected even though it might not be something you would
>> > purchase
>> > or play yourself. And some people would say such technical masters
>> > are in a sense, displaying their egos because their heads are too
>> > swelled
>> > to actually fit within the context of a airplay freindly song.
>> > (although
>> > apparently Buckethead's mask gimic seems to work well by saying "hey -
>> > it's
>> > about the music and the audience doesn't need to put a face to it..
>> > blah
>> > blah)
>> > Hey - if trick or treat is your thing then that's cool. Boo! heh.
>> >
>> > I dunno - I don't make too many judgements on all this -
>> > to each his or her own I suppose. At least to me it's a kind
>> > of sideshow you would go to rather than any sort of act happening
>> > in the main ring(s). But still, it's all within the same circus grounds
>> > known as music.
>> >
>> > peace out.
>>
>> squier you are a fantastic addition to this newsgroup and write great
>> posts
>> that contain good insites
>>
>> But in this case I didn't read you thoughtfully written post as all can
>> say
>> is:
>>
>>
>> Buckethead Sucks!!!!
>>
>>
>
> heh. well I guess you don't like him much ;)
>
> you're cool person too. You always say how you feel
> and tell it straight up. props to you.
>
> Yeah - a lot of people have no interest in the bucketman
> and I can definitely understand why.
>
> take care.
You know I love KFC and that is what I always see him wearing. A KFC bucket
and I guess I am just jealous of how he has so much KFC and I don't.
Guess it is just KFC envy mostly.
Re: Buckethead video
"Lee Waun" <leewaun@telus . net > wrote
> You know I love KFC and that is what I always see him wearing. A KFC
> bucket and I guess I am just jealous of how he has so much KFC and I
> don't.
>
> Guess it is just KFC envy mostly.
Heh....that was pretty good.
Peace,
Polfus
"Lee Waun" <leewaun@telus . net > wrote
> You know I love KFC and that is what I always see him wearing. A KFC
> bucket and I guess I am just jealous of how he has so much KFC and I
> don't.
>
> Guess it is just KFC envy mostly.
Heh....that was pretty good.
Peace,
Polfus
Re: Buckethead video
On 08 May 2008, mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote in alt.guitar:
> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
I've heard some other things from Buckethead that were much more
melodic and really interesting. I think he's not just a shredder, and
this industrial-type stuff is yet another style that I've never heard
from him before. I don't really appreciate his persona and gimmick, but
I think he can play a bunch of styles very well.
On 08 May 2008, mercutio <jim@witsend . com > wrote in alt.guitar:
> Thanks I thought it was just me. I even tried about 4 others out and
> they all sounded sort of the same and equally awful
I've heard some other things from Buckethead that were much more
melodic and really interesting. I think he's not just a shredder, and
this industrial-type stuff is yet another style that I've never heard
from him before. I don't really appreciate his persona and gimmick, but
I think he can play a bunch of styles very well.
Re: Buckethead video
"winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote
>
> <BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
> news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>>
>> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
>> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
>> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
>
>
> Buckethead sucks.
You are dead wrong.
You may hate his guts and think his music sucks ass, but make no
mistake...he does *not* suck.
Peace,
Polfus
"winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote
>
> <BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
> news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>>
>> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
>> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
>> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
>
>
> Buckethead sucks.
You are dead wrong.
You may hate his guts and think his music sucks ass, but make no
mistake...he does *not* suck.
Peace,
Polfus
Re: Buckethead video
Polfus wrote:
>
> "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote
>
>>
>> <BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
>> news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>>>
>>> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
>>> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
>>> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
>>
>>
>> Buckethead sucks.
>
> You are dead wrong.
>
> You may hate his guts and think his music sucks ass, but make no
> mistake...he does *not* suck.
>
> Peace,
> Polfus
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
--
Les Cargill
Polfus wrote:
>
> "winnard" <8track1@cox . net > wrote
>
>>
>> <BigBadWolf68@gmail . com > wrote in message
>> news:d4055796-d722-40e5-8a36-c74e8d6b5f37@w4g2000prd.googlegroups . com ...
>>>
>>> I just dug up this Buckethead video for Lobotomizer that I made a few
>>> years ago. I tried to get a DVD to him, but never heard if he saw
>>> it. Thought it might be appreciated in these here parts, though.
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=DmhQwkCE-AA
>>
>>
>> Buckethead sucks.
>
> You are dead wrong.
>
> You may hate his guts and think his music sucks ass, but make no
> mistake...he does *not* suck.
>
> Peace,
> Polfus
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
--
Les Cargill
Re: Buckethead video
"Les Cargill" <lcargill@cfl.rr . com > wrote
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
>
> Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
Holyshithatscoolashell.
I swear I wish I could lay claim to coming up with something so farging
killer....and I mean the music.
The visuals..wow...that should have won an award of some type. Brilliant.
Perfect video for him....THANK YOU for that, Les.
And here..this one sounds ten times better, so check it out:
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=1bSZslEDUl0
And he is rather large, by the way:
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=HApn34ML5U4
I really like his music and playing...and when he actually goes ahead and
rocks out, he is killer.
Peace,
Polfus
"Les Cargill" <lcargill@cfl.rr . com > wrote
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
>
> Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
Holyshithatscoolashell.
I swear I wish I could lay claim to coming up with something so farging
killer....and I mean the music.
The visuals..wow...that should have won an award of some type. Brilliant.
Perfect video for him....THANK YOU for that, Les.
And here..this one sounds ten times better, so check it out:
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=1bSZslEDUl0
And he is rather large, by the way:
* w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=HApn34ML5U4
I really like his music and playing...and when he actually goes ahead and
rocks out, he is killer.
Peace,
Polfus
Re: Buckethead video
This is one strange dude, but he sure plays a mean axe.
For the longest time I thought this was whole buckethead thing was
shenanigans. Who knew...
-Larry
"Polfus" <nostringscouldsecureyou@thestation> wrote in message
news:4823dbb4$0$5692$4c368faf@roadrunner . com ...
>
> "Les Cargill" <lcargill@cfl.rr . com > wrote
>
>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
>>
>> Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
>
> Holyshithatscoolashell.
>
> I swear I wish I could lay claim to coming up with something so farging
> killer....and I mean the music.
>
> The visuals..wow...that should have won an award of some type. Brilliant.
>
> Perfect video for him....THANK YOU for that, Les.
>
> And here..this one sounds ten times better, so check it out:
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=1bSZslEDUl0
>
> And he is rather large, by the way:
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=HApn34ML5U4
>
> I really like his music and playing...and when he actually goes ahead and
> rocks out, he is killer.
>
> Peace,
> Polfus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This is one strange dude, but he sure plays a mean axe.
For the longest time I thought this was whole buckethead thing was
shenanigans. Who knew...
-Larry
"Polfus" <nostringscouldsecureyou@thestation> wrote in message
news:4823dbb4$0$5692$4c368faf@roadrunner . com ...
>
> "Les Cargill" <lcargill@cfl.rr . com > wrote
>
>> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=YgbDD5YL31Y
>>
>> Heironymous Bosch images animated to a Buckethead track.
>
> Holyshithatscoolashell.
>
> I swear I wish I could lay claim to coming up with something so farging
> killer....and I mean the music.
>
> The visuals..wow...that should have won an award of some type. Brilliant.
>
> Perfect video for him....THANK YOU for that, Les.
>
> And here..this one sounds ten times better, so check it out:
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=1bSZslEDUl0
>
> And he is rather large, by the way:
>
> * w w w .youtube . com /watch?v=HApn34ML5U4
>
> I really like his music and playing...and when he actually goes ahead and
> rocks out, he is killer.
>
> Peace,
> Polfus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
