Keith's new alias?

Re: Keith's new alias?


"The Repair Guy" <repairguy1993@yahoo,com > wrote in message
news:7rtt24hmq17thqkrb1hvlcirfcradu769n@4ax,com ...
> Andy <no@spam.no> wrote:
>
>>> If KA or anyone else posted something like that
>>> it is wrong.
>>
>>Hint: It wasn't 'anyone else', it was KA. Why do
>>you think there's so much hostility towards him?
>
> * Because he's obnoxious and semi-literate?
> * Because he can't reply to the right post?
> * Because he's threatened people?
> * Because he frequents alt.guitar, but says
> guitar players aren't musicians?
> * Because he demands that people post clips
> of their playing, but has never done it himself?
> * Because his butcher-block guitar bodies fall
> apart? (okay, that was a cheap shot...)
> * Because he acts all macho, but has admitted
> sponging off his girlfriend?
> * http :// tinyurl,com /4vb42k
> "Looking for a bi lady in L.A. to put my womens
> very talented mouth to work. Pictures on request
> to serious only"
>
> etc., etc.
>
> The Repair Guy
> repairguy1993 dot netfirms dot com

Why the Hell does this shit bother you so much....don't listen to
it....that's all you gotta do...if you go looking for him on that
newsgroup...I guess you were there for the same reason too? Damn, I let the
assholes be assholes....that's the hidden bill in the bill of
rights.....just walk on by.

Re: Keith's new alias?


"PapaCarl" <papacarl@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:1OadnfOuIOw6XLLVnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@comcast,com ...
>
> "The Repair Guy" <repairguy1993@yahoo,com > wrote in message
> news:7rtt24hmq17thqkrb1hvlcirfcradu769n@4ax,com ...
>> Andy <no@spam.no> wrote:
>>
>>>> If KA or anyone else posted something like that
>>>> it is wrong.
>>>
>>>Hint: It wasn't 'anyone else', it was KA. Why do
>>>you think there's so much hostility towards him?
>>
>> * Because he's obnoxious and semi-literate?
>> * Because he can't reply to the right post?
>> * Because he's threatened people?
>> * Because he frequents alt.guitar, but says
>> guitar players aren't musicians?
>> * Because he demands that people post clips
>> of their playing, but has never done it himself?
>> * Because his butcher-block guitar bodies fall
>> apart? (okay, that was a cheap shot...)
>> * Because he acts all macho, but has admitted
>> sponging off his girlfriend?
>> * http :// tinyurl,com /4vb42k
>> "Looking for a bi lady in L.A. to put my womens
>> very talented mouth to work. Pictures on request
>> to serious only"
>>
>> etc., etc.
>>
>> The Repair Guy
>> repairguy1993 dot netfirms dot com
>
> Why the Hell does this shit bother you so much....don't listen to
> it....that's all you gotta do...if you go looking for him on that
> newsgroup...I guess you were there for the same reason too? Damn, I let
> the assholes be assholes....that's the hidden bill in the bill of
> rights.....just walk on by.
slurp slurp.

Re: Keith's new alias?


"PapaCarl" <papacarl@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:1OadnfOuIOw6XLLVnZ2dnUVZ gSdnZ2d@comcast,com ...
>
> "The Repair Guy" <repairguy1993@yahoo,com > wrote in message
> news:7rtt24hmq17thqkrb1hvlcirfcradu769n@4ax,com ...
>> Andy <no@spam.no> wrote:
>>
>>>> If KA or anyone else posted something like that
>>>> it is wrong.
>>>
>>>Hint: It wasn't 'anyone else', it was KA. Why do
>>>you think there's so much hostility towards him?
>>
>> * Because he's obnoxious and semi-literate?
>> * Because he can't reply to the right post?
>> * Because he's threatened people?
>> * Because he frequents alt.guitar, but says
>> guitar players aren't musicians?
>> * Because he demands that people post clips
>> of their playing, but has never done it himself?
>> * Because his butcher-block guitar bodies fall
>> apart? (okay, that was a cheap shot...)
>> * Because he acts all macho, but has admitted
>> sponging off his girlfriend?
>> * http :// tinyurl,com /4vb42k
>> "Looking for a bi lady in L.A. to put my womens
>> very talented mouth to work. Pictures on request
>> to serious only"
>>
>> etc., etc.
>>
>> The Repair Guy
>> repairguy1993 dot netfirms dot com
>
> Why the Hell does this shit bother you so much....don't listen to
> it....that's all you gotta do...if you go looking for him on that
> newsgroup...I guess you were there for the same reason too? Damn, I let
> the assholes be assholes....that's the hidden bill in the bill of
> rights.....just walk on by.
>
i guess the irony passed you by.

Re: Keith's new alias?

"PapaCarl" <papacarl@comcast,net > wrote:

>"The Repair Guy" <repairguy1993@yahoo,com > wrote...
>> Andy <no@spam.no> wrote:
>>
>>>> If KA or anyone else posted something like that
>>>> it is wrong.
>>>
>>>Hint: It wasn't 'anyone else', it was KA. Why do
>>>you think there's so much hostility towards him?
>>
>> * Because he's obnoxious and semi-literate?
>> * Because he can't reply to the right post?
>> * Because he's threatened people?
>> * Because he frequents alt.guitar, but says
>> guitar players aren't musicians?
>> * Because he demands that people post clips
>> of their playing, but has never done it himself?
>> * Because his butcher-block guitar bodies fall
>> apart? (okay, that was a cheap shot...)
>> * Because he acts all macho, but has admitted
>> sponging off his girlfriend?
>> * http :// tinyurl,com /4vb42k
>> "Looking for a bi lady in L.A. to put my womens
>> very talented mouth to work. Pictures on request
>> to serious only"
>>
>> etc., etc.
>
>Why the Hell does this shit bother you so much....

Doesn't. A question was asked (possibly rhetorical).
I answered it.

>don't listen to it....that's all you gotta do...

That's all Keith has to do, too.

>if you go looking for him on that newsgroup...I guess
>you were there for the same reason too?

The post in question was cited here in alt.guitar.

The Repair Guy
repairguy1993 dot netfirms dot com

Re: Keith's new alias?

On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:

>
> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
> news:p_dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky side,
>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm thinking
>>> of.
>>>
>>
>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>
> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either. If
> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.

Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
distasteful to say the least.

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

Re: Keith's new alias?


"Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
news:1sjnnh.sl8.19.1@news.alt,net ...
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>
>>
>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
>> news:p_dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky
>>>>>side,
>>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm thinking
>>>> of.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>>
>> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either.
>> If
>> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.
>
> Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
> that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
> jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
> child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
> model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
> younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
> distasteful to say the least.


Totally agree with that. It was in poor taste...but it wasn't child porn.
My only point is these wimps that keep bringing it up and making it bigger
than it was, they give it the life. They do this type stuff for their own
sick gratification, not because they are truly upset over what somebody
posted. If nobody paid any attention to posts in poor taste, they would
disappear. OMHO, Like I said in my original comment....Keith did some
things that annoyed me....but he also extended himself to me to help me with
some stuff, so I will take the good and throw out the bad....to me, that is
the only way to live. I don't think a lot of kids are doing the posting
here, except for Vamp and perhaps a few others not to many ladies
either.....but there is still a huge testosterone defecit around here and
some guys trying to find some. Again, OMHO.....and I've been wrong a lot in
my life.

Re: Keith's new alias?


"PapaCarl" <papacarl@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:S6mdnYELsdcmX7LVnZ2dnUVZ_tPinZ2d@comcast,com ...
>
> "Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
> news:1sjnnh.sl8.19.1@news.alt,net ...
>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
>>> news:p_dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky
>>>>>>side,
>>>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm thinking
>>>>> of.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>>>
>>> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either.
>>> If
>>> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.
>>
>> Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
>> that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
>> jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
>> child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
>> model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
>> younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
>> distasteful to say the least.
>
>
> Totally agree with that. It was in poor taste...but it wasn't child porn.
> My only point is these wimps that keep bringing it up and making it bigger
> than it was, they give it the life. They do this type stuff for their own
> sick gratification, not because they are truly upset over what somebody
> posted. If nobody paid any attention to posts in poor taste, they would
> disappear. OMHO, Like I said in my original comment....Keith did some
> things that annoyed me....but he also extended himself to me to help me
> with some stuff, so I will take the good and throw out the bad....to me,
> that is the only way to live. I don't think a lot of kids are doing the
> posting here, except for Vamp and perhaps a few others not to many ladies
> either.....but there is still a huge testosterone defecit around here and
> some guys trying to find some. Again, OMHO.....and I've been wrong a lot
> in my life.
>
keith! keith! keith! keith! keith!

Re: Keith's new alias?


"PapaCarl" <papacarl@comcast,net > wrote in message
news:S6mdnYELsdcmX7LVnZ2dnUVZ tPinZ2d@comcast,com ...
>
> "Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
> news:1sjnnh.sl8.19.1@news.alt,net ...
>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
>>> news:p dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky
>>>>>>side,
>>>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm thinking
>>>>> of.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>>>
>>> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either.
>>> If
>>> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.
>>
>> Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
>> that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
>> jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
>> child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
>> model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
>> younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
>> distasteful to say the least.
>
>
> Totally agree with that. It was in poor taste...but it wasn't child porn.

A picture of a baby with an adult dong isn't porn? I guess we've been
desensitized by the internet.

Re: Keith's new alias?

On Sun, 18 May 2008 01:46:32 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:

>
> "Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
> news:1sjnnh.sl8.19.1@news.alt,net ...
>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
>>> news:p_dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky
>>>>>>side,
>>>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm thinking
>>>>> of.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>>>
>>> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either.
>>> If
>>> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.
>>
>> Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
>> that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
>> jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
>> child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
>> model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
>> younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
>> distasteful to say the least.
>
>
> Totally agree with that. It was in poor taste...but it wasn't child porn.
> My only point is these wimps that keep bringing it up and making it bigger
> than it was, they give it the life. They do this type stuff for their own
> sick gratification, not because they are truly upset over what somebody
> posted. If nobody paid any attention to posts in poor taste, they would
> disappear. OMHO, Like I said in my original comment....Keith did some
> things that annoyed me....but he also extended himself to me to help me with
> some stuff, so I will take the good and throw out the bad....to me, that is
> the only way to live. I don't think a lot of kids are doing the posting
> here, except for Vamp and perhaps a few others not to many ladies
> either.....but there is still a huge testosterone defecit around here and
> some guys trying to find some. Again, OMHO.....and I've been wrong a lot in
> my life.

That's cool. I respect your right to do as you wish. There are many others
in the group that would extend themselves to you so that doesn't make
Keith any more special than anyone else. Personally I think he's a fucking
asshole and that no extension of himself can ever redeem all the
negativity he brings regardless of whatever minuscule good is included.

Re: Keith's new alias?


"Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
news:1smc55.39l.19.1@news.alt,net ...
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 01:46:32 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>
>>
>> "Meat Plow" <meat@petitmorte,net > wrote in message
>> news:1sjnnh.sl8.19.1@news.alt,net ...
>>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 02:34:08 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Jon" <texasrocker1@suddenlink,net > wrote in message
>>>> news:p_dXj.33177$3i3.17716@newsfe14.phx...
>>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:01:19 -0400, PapaCarl wrote:
>>>>>>>Look, Keith is the first to admit he can be a little on the cranky
>>>>>>>side,
>>>>>>>but stuff he posts is usually accurate and always appropriate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Which Keith are you referring to? Certainly not the Keith I'm
>>>>>> thinking
>>>>>> of.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Really. On what planet is child pornography considered appropriate?
>>>>
>>>> No planet....and, I have no idea of what you are talking about either.
>>>> If
>>>> KA or anyone else posted something like that it is wrong.
>>>
>>> Keith posted in this group a picture of a naked baby standing in a crib
>>> that had been altered by adding a grown man's penis to the baby. Keith
>>> jested that this was a baby picture of him. While a stretch to label it
>>> child porn to some, some would consider it pornographic. I'm no role
>>> model of civility but this is a public news group and it can be read by
>>> younger children and the posting of any such an altered photo is very
>>> distasteful to say the least.
>>
>>
>> Totally agree with that. It was in poor taste...but it wasn't child
>> porn.
>> My only point is these wimps that keep bringing it up and making it
>> bigger
>> than it was, they give it the life. They do this type stuff for their
>> own
>> sick gratification, not because they are truly upset over what somebody
>> posted. If nobody paid any attention to posts in poor taste, they would
>> disappear. OMHO, Like I said in my original comment....Keith did some
>> things that annoyed me....but he also extended himself to me to help me
>> with
>> some stuff, so I will take the good and throw out the bad....to me, that
>> is
>> the only way to live. I don't think a lot of kids are doing the posting
>> here, except for Vamp and perhaps a few others not to many ladies
>> either.....but there is still a huge testosterone defecit around here and
>> some guys trying to find some. Again, OMHO.....and I've been wrong a lot
>> in
>> my life.
>
> That's cool. I respect your right to do as you wish. There are many others
> in the group that would extend themselves to you so that doesn't make
> Keith any more special than anyone else. Personally I think he's a fucking
> asshole and that no extension of himself can ever redeem all the
> negativity he brings regardless of whatever minuscule good is included.


Look....I don't see Keith as the focus of this exchange at all...,it is some
whimp ass guys that never post on topic, and always have something to say
about someone.....and, more than once when I've taken a stance against some
of these totally anonymous whiners I've started being besieged by junk mail
and all kinds of crap....that is where THERE level of living is...,it 's all
about these guys feeling tough, and they simply aren't....that is all I'm
saying. I don't disagree with you at all on many issues, most issues. But,
Keith doesn't hide....that is what I'm pointing out, I have a hard time
agreeing with these guys that post under ten or more different names and
always have a fake address etc. They talk tough but want total anonymity.
That says a lot to me about who and what they really are. I'm sorry I got
into this....won't do it again. Take care, I wish you well. Papa