Re: MURDER ALL REPUBLICANS
"DGDevin" <dgdevin@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:Q9WdnXrN1JdMkofVnZ2dnUVZ_uqdnZ2d@earthlink,com ...
> Elvis Kabong wrote:
>
>> I think I understand the sentiment though.
>
> That post suggests whoever wrote it has serious emotional problems, what
> part of mindless violence against innocent people (any Republican's
> *children* should be raped and tortured to death?) evokes your
> understanding? Also consider there's a good chance the poster's real
> intent was to make lefties sound like psychos.
What I was suggesting is not literally murder. Instead, I can
understand why liberals would hate back the hateful, divisive,
arrogant, uncomprimising warmongering ultra-conservative
useful idiots.
However, the last sentence of yours above is the most likely
explanation.
>> Thanks to greedy "business before people" asshole repugs,
>> we have this stupid "war" in Iraq, overpriced gasoline,
>
> Maybe the problem isn't overpriced gasoline, maybe the problem is
> Americans insisting on driving oversized, overpowered gas guzzlers and
> believing they have a divine right to all the cheap gas they want. I'll
> guess gas will hit five bucks a gallon this summer, maybe then more
> Americans will decide to take the damn bus once in awhile. And if they
> don't, if they insist on pulling a thirty-foot boat behind an
> eight-passenger SUV to go the lake every weekend, okay, it's going to cost
> them what it costs the rest of the world, welcome to the 21st century
> folks.
Well, it's combination of both. When you have wilbur whining
about liberals wanting to tell Americans what kind of car
they should drive and so on, I get a big laugh at the stupid
arrogant pigs who thought they were so macho, they *deserve*
to own a gas guzzling tacky piece of inefficient monstrosity
and *now* they're doing all of the whining about gas prices
instead of insisting that car makers make more fuel efficient
cars or seeking to buy one. What a bunch of chumps!
> As for the rest, consider that many of the things you complain of didn't
> begin the day Bush took office, for example Enron and the other great
> corporate scandals of recent memory happened on Clinton's watch, he's also
> the fellow who signed off on NAFTA as you might recall. I entirely agree
> that the Bush administration deserves to be damned for many things. But
> let's blame them for the things they deserve blame for, and let's do so
> without sounding like we belong in a chanting mob in Tehran, unless of
> course we don't care about whether anyone takes us seriously.
But is Duhbya doing anything to reverse what Clinton set into action?