Re: GWB Most Unpopular President Ever?DGDevin wrote:
> Les Cargill wrote:
>
>> I think that 20 years out, he'll be considered a very good President.
>
> Perhaps on the Mars colony, not on this planet.
>
>> TR couldn't get *arrested* by the end of his career, and he ended up
>> on Mount Rushmore. People forget the hubris.
>
> It's hard to imagine a meaningful comparison between TR and Bush.
Try this:
* w w w .amazon . com /Theodore-Rex-Modern-Library-Paperbacks/dp/0812966007/ref=pd bbs sr 1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1209767347&sr=8-1
There are far more points in common than in difference. They have to do
with how they viewed America's role in the world. I mean, almost
everything TR did was imperial.
That book is why I said that - and Edmund Morris did a CSPAN detailing
the similarities, which I found interesting.
> TR wrote
> 35 books, Bush probably hasn't read 35 books. TR won a Noble Prize, he was
> VP before becoming President and Asst. Sec. of the Navy and Governor before
> that, he was widely considered an intellectual of his day.
Different time. We would no longer elect somebody who had written so
much as a published academic paper. Some mirror that is, isn't it?
Seen Kuchinich lately? I haven't, either. Dumb all over. A little
ugly on the side....
> TR was a war
> hero, Bush stood in front of a Mission Accomplished banner. TR made a huge
> impact in many areas, and usually not in terms since associated with words
> like "fiasco" and "disaster."
Bush tried to be a warrior. His timing wasn't very good. And face it,
he's not the sort to do the modern chain-of-command thing. But
neither was TR.... the Rough Riders were not exactly a standard
military organization... some people have compared them to
Civil War Irregulars. Meh - lousy comparison, but it grows on
you.
> TR helped to establish some of the public
> institutions that the Bush admin has been trying to dismantle, e.g. pure
> food and drug laws, national parks and so on.
Exactly. Yes yes! See, I think that makes 'em a lot the same - they both
operated according to the fashion of the time...
But really, my point went more to our demonstrated inability to predict
how a president will be viewed during the lame duck days of his
presidency. TR had people who would have slit his *throat* by the end,
and by the time the Bull Moose thing was over, he was done for.
> Yes, he had his less
> attractive side too, but the point is he had an impressive side, where
> exactly do we go to see Bush's attractive qualities?
>
>
* w w w .pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/bushswar/
Make popcorn first. It's five hours.
Look. Bush's presentation does not bother me. I grew up with people
who talked like that, sorta like Levon Helm's character in "The Right
Stuff". I do not assume that makes 'em dumb. Because it does not. Some
people use that to hustle people.
The rest of it... requires a not inconsiderable amount of
work to dig up. None of the stuff on the Frontline was all
that well spread around.
Bush has considerable grace under what was immense pressure, has
a highly loyalty-driven leadership style ( almost to the point of being
a weakness ) and had good political fire discipline. Until you think
about everything that happened, it's hard ( for me at least )
to remember it all. This was Deep Sh*t. This was an existential
crisis. We were *scared*.
The problem was that his team did not cotton to dissent. At all. You
spoke up in opposition, and you were Out. I think he was a Veep away
from being a very good President - Cheney is just *phenomenal* at
infighting.
I am not making this up, this is not a troll, and I mean no offense.
There is a lotta there there. It is fun to dig through. The guy's
weaknesses are incredible, but he's very resolute in overcoming them.
He is a person of not inconsiderable will.
--
Les Cargill