VOTE FOR BARACK!

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

In article <60d4309a-b3f0-4488-89f1-02a6c75e65fb@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups,com >,
The "genius" who poses as Mr Sole <pcDAW@comcast,net > blubbered:

>> >Well then why didn't the Rep Congress get it through?
>>
>> Because it didn't come up for a vote
>Are you really as dumb as you sound? It didn't come up for a vote
>because the Rep's didn't bring it up.

Someone who can't properly trim a posting without losing context,
read a calendar, or construct a coherent sentence should be careful
about tossing around the term "dumb".

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

Mr Soul wrote:
>> I'm sure that Nancy Pelosi and that asshole Harry Reid are rejoicing too.
>> Not that they'll actually *do* anything of substance to improve things.
> They've already done more good than the Republicans did.
>
> "Soul searching Republicans are turning to an unlikely savior, one-
> time party heretic and now presumptive White House nominee John
> McCain, as they try to stave off an electoral disaster.
> Stung by the Democratic seizure of three staunch conservative seats in
> Congress, Republican lawmakers fear a shellacking in November's
> general election, after losing control of both chambers of Congress in
> 2006. "
>
> Mr Soul
>
>
Unfortunately, much of America is a racist pig, just one question deep.

Uneducated, ignorant slobs are incapable of grasping the issues
and with bumper sticker mentalities, may expose their rotten fear and
hay8 in droves,if *they* turn out to vote.

The Supreme Court is a pig sty. The military industrial complex is
pure evil in terms of valuing $$$ over ethics. A recession puts
tremendous value on the $$$ D.C. hands out to Northrop, McDonnel,
etc. and that crowd is going to begin shoveling tons of negative
ad campaign $$$ into the fray. Also, insurance lobbyists, pharmaceutical
lobbyists and oil will be there for McCain.

November's going to be either a beautiful example of decency finally
surfacing, or horrible proof that this country was sold long ago and
rotten to the core with fringes of helpless decency forever lost to
a time that came and went, with Chinese Communist Market Fundamentalism
next in line to horde the world's power and gold...

Athens...Rome...London...Washington......Beijing.

I'm not so sanguine about any disaster befalling McCain. He's got THE
SYSTEM behind him and Wall Street will rear its ugly, filthy $$$ head
come Autumn.

I'm solidly for Obama, but I'm experienced at life enough to know-

We've got one hell of a test of the American people before us.

Let's hope, and VOTE! :-) mvm

-- deleted messages --

-- deleted messages --

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

Mike Pritchard wrote:

> I hope you're not suggesting that's what I'm doing here? You really
> know nothing about me to suggest I'm liberal. The only thing you do
> know...is that I don't care for Mr. GWB. That does NOT make me
> liberal...,it makes me NORMAL.

Damn, that's good enough to go on a t-shirt.

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

On Tue, 13 May 2008 13:31:16 -0500, Mike Pritchard
<mrp@no-spam.uiuc.edu> wrote:

>
>
>Lord Valve wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, His Royal Chocolate Easterbunnyness seems to have added seven
>> new states, and he isn't even elected yet! That's a helluva trick, I gotta
>>
>> admit:
>>
>> http :// latimesblogs.latimes,com /washington/2008/05/new-patriotic-o.html
>>
>> So - the decision now is, do we want four more years of the Bush
>> administration, or four more years of the Carter administration?
>>
>> Help us out, Jimmuh!
>>
>> Lord Valve
>> BaaaaaarrrrrAAAACCCCKKKKK!!!! <Safety!>
>
>Now LV...if I didn't know better, I'd have to suggest your post indicates a
>touch of racism. Otherwise, you would have simply said "royal easter bunny",
>leaving out the "chocolate" designation. There's no need to go there...
>
>As for *my* decision....I don't see how this country can possibly survive 4
>more years of anything even resembling GW's administration. I'll vote for
>darned near *anything* that gets us clear from that
>mess!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Now...let's just hope the country can survive long enough for W to pack up the
>moving van and leave....
>
>Mike
The problem is as I see it is one of them is too inexperienced to
handle a war as well as some suspicious ties to anti American groups,
one has a past history of inappropriate behavior and scandals and has
her focus on robbing the medical system, the other one is way to
Amerio and illegal alien friendly as well as too old. So, unless
somehow one of the third party's is elected, we are mucked anyways..

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

Mike Pritchard wrote:
> Lord Valve wrote:
>
>> Hmmm, His Royal Chocolate Easterbunnyness seems to have added seven
>> new states, and he isn't even elected yet! That's a helluva trick,
>> I gotta
>>
>> admit:
>>
>> http :// latimesblogs.latimes,com /washington/2008/05/new-patriotic-o.html
>>
>> So - the decision now is, do we want four more years of the Bush
>> administration, or four more years of the Carter administration?
>>
>> Help us out, Jimmuh!
>>
>> Lord Valve
>> BaaaaaarrrrrAAAACCCCKKKKK!!!! <Safety!>
>
> Now LV...if I didn't know better, I'd have to suggest your post
> indicates a touch of racism. Otherwise, you would have simply said
> "royal easter bunny", leaving out the "chocolate" designation.
> There's no need to go there...
>
> As for *my* decision....I don't see how this country can possibly
> survive 4 more years of anything even resembling GW's administration.
> I'll vote for darned near *anything* that gets us clear from that
> mess!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Now...let's just hope the country can survive long enough for W to
> pack up the moving van and leave....
>
> Mike

Not too many people seem to have noticed last October when LV took "Pastor
Rob" to task for using a racist epithet on this NG. That for damn sure does
NOT mean he isn't racist, but it does speak to some level of character on
his part. I think he probably is a racist bastard, but we're all a little
bit racist, and I've seen people jump pretty quickly to accusing him of
wearing a sheet, which is a bit excessive, if not stupid.

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!


"TPS" <theron@u.washington.edu> wrote in message
news:g0d4fp$9ov$1@gnus01.u.washington.edu...
> Mike Pritchard wrote:
>> Lord Valve wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm, His Royal Chocolate Easterbunnyness seems to have added seven
>>> new states, and he isn't even elected yet! That's a helluva trick,
>>> I gotta
>>>
>>> admit:
>>>
>>> http :// latimesblogs.latimes,com /washington/2008/05/new-patriotic-o.html
>>>
>>> So - the decision now is, do we want four more years of the Bush
>>> administration, or four more years of the Carter administration?
>>>
>>> Help us out, Jimmuh!
>>>
>>> Lord Valve
>>> BaaaaaarrrrrAAAACCCCKKKKK!!!! <Safety!>
>>
>> Now LV...if I didn't know better, I'd have to suggest your post
>> indicates a touch of racism. Otherwise, you would have simply said
>> "royal easter bunny", leaving out the "chocolate" designation.
>> There's no need to go there...
>>
>> As for *my* decision....I don't see how this country can possibly
>> survive 4 more years of anything even resembling GW's administration.
>> I'll vote for darned near *anything* that gets us clear from that
>> mess!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> Now...let's just hope the country can survive long enough for W to
>> pack up the moving van and leave....
>>
>> Mike
>
> Not too many people seem to have noticed last October when LV took "Pastor
> Rob" to task for using a racist epithet on this NG. That for damn sure
> does NOT mean he isn't racist, but it does speak to some level of
> character on his part. I think he probably is a racist bastard, but we're
> all a little bit racist, and I've seen people jump pretty quickly to
> accusing him of wearing a sheet, which is a bit excessive, if not stupid.

I think all of us are a bit racist, but some of us are trying
not to be assholes about it like wet fart william is.

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

TPS wrote:

> Not too many people seem to have noticed last October when LV took
> "Pastor Rob" to task for using a racist epithet on this NG. That for
> damn sure does NOT mean he isn't racist, but it does speak to some
> level of character on his part. I think he probably is a racist
> bastard, but we're all a little bit racist, and I've seen people jump
> pretty quickly to accusing him of wearing a sheet, which is a bit
> excessive, if not stupid.

LV has been playing this game for years, being all coy and flirty with the
concept without quite committing to it in print. I figure somebody only
gets so many shots at the mock ebonics and Tarbaby parodies and cracks about
chocolate Easter Bunnies and so on before we're justified in figuring
there's something more there than just a wicked sense of humor. That sort
of "humor" is right up there with Mulay's so-called humor, i.e. it ain't
really humor at all, it's just the mask slipping to show what's underneath.

Re: VOTE FOR BARACK!

Mike Pritchard wrote:
>
> Now LV...if I didn't know better, I'd have to suggest your post indicates a
> touch of racism. Otherwise, you would have simply said "royal easter bunny",
> leaving out the "chocolate" designation. There's no need to go there...
>
> As for *my* decision....I don't see how this country can possibly survive 4
> more years of anything even resembling GW's administration. I'll vote for
> darned near *anything* that gets us clear from that
> mess!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Now...let's just hope the country can survive long enough for W to pack up the
> moving van and leave....
>
> Mike
>
:-) A+ mvm