Re: Behringer Power Amps?jeffb wrote:
> Todd H. wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but if we hadn't been through this crap in rec.audio.pro and
>> here several times before, this claim of Behringer ripping off the RMX
>> line directly wouldn't be so tiresome.
>>
>
> Behringer did get a rep early on for being a knock-off company and it's
> easy to wrongly assume they're still at it with everything the turn out.
> I would probably never buy anything Behringer to use myself but I will
> admit that a lot of what they make now seems to be a whole lot better
> than their earlier products. Initial perceptions and prejudices die hard
> though.
>
> I remember having a Traynor Bass Master when I was a kid and how we all
> thought Traynor stuff was crap. I couldn't wait to get rid of the thing
> and I think I sold it to get an Acoustic 360 which was a harsh sounding,
1) Jaco used a 360. Recorded examples aren't particularly harsh.
2) My 370 lasted 29 years, and I'd bought it used.
Acoustic amps *could* be harsh, but that didn't come across in the
crowd, and it was largely a function of how you dial the thing in.
Still, I think it was Albert Collins who used an Acoustic for
guitar, one with a horn. Ouch! Icepick indeed.
> unreliable POS. If I'd been educated enough to understand the Traynor
> was a well built, point to point wired tube amp I would have kept
> it...these days that amp is going for twice what it cost new. When STILL
> I fall into this trap of misperception like I did here I kinda get down
> on myself for it..you'd think I would have learned by now.
>
>
>
--
Les Cargill