OT Nuke Iran?

Bad idea, Sparky...

* w w w .ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html

On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:05:43 -0800, KFB <killforbucks@patriot . net >
wrote:

>Bad idea, Sparky...


Why?

Because some Lib propaganda site says so?

Don't believe everything you read on the net, Bucky.




>
> * w w w .ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:20:06 -0800, Rickenbacker wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:05:43 -0800, KFB <killforbucks@patriot . net >
> wrote:
>
>>Bad idea, Sparky...
>
>
> Why?
>
> Because some Lib propaganda site says so?
>
> Don't believe everything you read on the net, Bucky.
>
>>
>> * w w w .ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html

Absolutely, I was thinking the same thing. Who are these so-called
Scientists, and hey...isn't the Union part of their name a little pinko?
How about their Concern(ed) sobriquet? I'd wager there's some nefarious
personal concern at stake here.

Perhaps instead of that wimpy Bunker Buster - what is that thing anyway,
looking like some kind of sausage - they're probably up late nights
thinking of developing some huge macho spherical device. Sure, it could
be called the Ball Buster!

Furthermore, I've never seen any convincing studies that radiation causes
any more than an unsightly tan, and what about those WWI vets who were
gassed and lived to a ripe old age?

Yeah, this is all bullshit, pure and simple...

Frank

On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:16:40 GMT, Frank <fpirrone@localnet . com > wrote:

>On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 00:20:06 -0800, Rickenbacker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:05:43 -0800, KFB <killforbucks@patriot . net >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Bad idea, Sparky...
>>
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> Because some Lib propaganda site says so?
>>
>> Don't believe everything you read on the net, Bucky.
>>
>>>
>>> * w w w .ucsusa.org/global_security/nuclear_weapons/nuclear-bunker-buster-rnep-animation.html
>
>Absolutely, I was thinking the same thing. Who are these so-called
>Scientists, and hey...isn't the Union part of their name a little pinko?
>How about their Concern(ed) sobriquet? I'd wager there's some nefarious
>personal concern at stake here.
>
>Perhaps instead of that wimpy Bunker Buster - what is that thing anyway,
>looking like some kind of sausage - they're probably up late nights
>thinking of developing some huge macho spherical device. Sure, it could
>be called the Ball Buster!
>
>Furthermore, I've never seen any convincing studies that radiation causes
>any more than an unsightly tan, and what about those WWI vets who were
>gassed and lived to a ripe old age?
>
>Yeah, this is all bullshit, pure and simple...
>
>Frank



Hey, it's Frank the Fruitcake!

The guy that believes it's true because he saw it on a cartoon on the
Internet!


"It's on the Internet! That means it's true!" - Frank the Fruitcake