Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
* w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
many trucks and cars throughout the state.
Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
north.
The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
vehicle accessories.
Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
protested.
The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
"It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
--
Michael Joseph Jackson
Countdown Clock Of Doom
* tinyurl . com /3ok629
* w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
many trucks and cars throughout the state.
Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
north.
The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
vehicle accessories.
Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
protested.
The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
"It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
--
Michael Joseph Jackson
Countdown Clock Of Doom
* tinyurl . com /3ok629
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
parking) solved in Florida.
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
parking) solved in Florida.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
Laurence Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail . com > wrote in
alt.gossip.celebrities:
> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
>> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
>> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
>> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
>> south end of a bull moving north.
>
>
> I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
> parking) solved in Florida.
>
I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
--
Brandy Alexandre
Inspiring. Isn't it? A government of the people for the people... and
answerable to the people. At least that's the idea... -- Tom Zarek
Laurence Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail . com > wrote in
alt.gossip.celebrities:
> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>
>> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
>> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
>> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
>> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
>> south end of a bull moving north.
>
>
> I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
> parking) solved in Florida.
>
I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
--
Brandy Alexandre
Inspiring. Isn't it? A government of the people for the people... and
answerable to the people. At least that's the idea... -- Tom Zarek
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
In article <Xns9A8ED2EFABC508675309@64.209.0.89>, It's the Principle! wrote:
>Laurence Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail . com > wrote in
>alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
>> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>>> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
>>> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
>>> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
>>> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
>>> south end of a bull moving north.
>>
>>
>> I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
>> parking) solved in Florida.
>>
>
>I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
>put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
Here ya go:
* w w w .funnyhub . com /pictures/pages/nice-headlights.html
In article <Xns9A8ED2EFABC508675309@64.209.0.89>, It's the Principle! wrote:
>Laurence Sheldon <lfsheldon@gmail . com > wrote in
>alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
>> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>>> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
>>> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
>>> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
>>> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
>>> south end of a bull moving north.
>>
>>
>> I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
>> parking) solved in Florida.
>>
>
>I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
>put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
Here ya go:
* w w w .funnyhub . com /pictures/pages/nice-headlights.html
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Apr 28, 9:44 pm, "It's the Principle!"
<brandy...@kittylitternewsguy . com > wrote:
> Laurence Sheldon <lfshel...@gmail . com > wrote in
> alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
> > Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>
> >> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
> >> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
> >> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
> >> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
> >> south end of a bull moving north.
>
> > I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
> > parking) solved in Florida.
>
> I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
> put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
I believe that Cadillac already did that, back in the 50's.
nate
On Apr 28, 9:44 pm, "It's the Principle!"
<brandy...@kittylitternewsguy . com > wrote:
> Laurence Sheldon <lfshel...@gmail . com > wrote in
> alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
> > Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
>
> >> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis,
> >> Florida, called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban.
> >> Motorists would be fined $60 for displaying the novelty items,
> >> which are known by brand names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the
> >> south end of a bull moving north.
>
> > I'm sure glad they have all the other serious problems (like truck
> > parking) solved in Florida.
>
> I think all the need to do is create some "headlights" for we women to
> put on our cars, and then the point will be made.
I believe that Cadillac already did that, back in the 50's.
nate
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
>
> The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> vehicle accessories.
>
> Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> protested.
>
> The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
I do agree that they are kind of, well, silly, but won't a ban on them also
look about as silly as the blanket bans on students carrying radio pagers in
schools looks now?
--
Regards, | |\
| | | | |\
Michael G. Koerner May they | | | | | | rise again!
Appleton, Wisconsin USA | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
>
> The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> vehicle accessories.
>
> Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> protested.
>
> The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
I do agree that they are kind of, well, silly, but won't a ban on them also
look about as silly as the blanket bans on students carrying radio pagers in
schools looks now?
--
Regards, | |\
| | | | |\
Michael G. Koerner May they | | | | | | rise again!
Appleton, Wisconsin USA | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
["Followup-To:" header set to misc.transport.road.]
On 2008-04-29, Fujikawa Yamamoto <amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
Naturally.
They pass crap like this because they're too ignorant to realize that they
have other, more important, things to do.
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive
Nah, what I find offensive is all the spammers and scammers that operate out
of South Florida, particularly the Boca Raton area. But since Florida's done
little, if anything, about those assholes, I don't hold forth much hope that
anything *will* be done. Instead they are trying to pass a law that apparently
is meant to prevent a large number of senior citizens from being offended by
bull testicles.
I am *so* glad I don't live in Florida.
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
I hope not.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED w w w .SteveSobol . com
Geek-for-hire. Details: * w w w .linkedin . com /in/stevesobol
["Followup-To:" header set to misc.transport.road.]
On 2008-04-29, Fujikawa Yamamoto <amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
Naturally.
They pass crap like this because they're too ignorant to realize that they
have other, more important, things to do.
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive
Nah, what I find offensive is all the spammers and scammers that operate out
of South Florida, particularly the Boca Raton area. But since Florida's done
little, if anything, about those assholes, I don't hold forth much hope that
anything *will* be done. Instead they are trying to pass a law that apparently
is meant to prevent a large number of senior citizens from being offended by
bull testicles.
I am *so* glad I don't live in Florida.
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
I hope not.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED w w w .SteveSobol . com
Geek-for-hire. Details: * w w w .linkedin . com /in/stevesobol
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Apr 28, 8:59 pm, Billy <B...@Billy.Joe.Bob> wrote:
> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> > * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> > TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> > to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> > many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> > Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> > called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be=
> > fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> > names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> > north.
>
> > The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> > transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> > In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> > questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> > vehicle accessories.
>
> > Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> > Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> > protested.
>
> > The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> > "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> > Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
>
> Who says My truck's are fake?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm surprised I beat necromancer to the punch on this....
* w w w .worldofnecromancer.org/pics/page2.html
On Apr 28, 8:59 pm, Billy <B...@Billy.Joe.Bob> wrote:
> Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> > * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> > TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> > to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> > many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> > Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> > called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be=
> > fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> > names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> > north.
>
> > The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> > transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> > In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> > questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> > vehicle accessories.
>
> > Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> > Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> > protested.
>
> > The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> > "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> > Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
>
> Who says My truck's are fake?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm surprised I beat necromancer to the punch on this....
* w w w .worldofnecromancer.org/pics/page2.html
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:09:43 -0700 (PDT), My Land of Misery
<grvan@netzero . net > wrote:
>I'm surprised I beat necromancer to the punch on this....
> * w w w .worldofnecromancer.org/pics/page2.html
Well, at 2100, I was at my favorite Italian restaurant enjoying a
calzone. I didn't get home untill about 2145 and didn't turn on the
computer till a few minutes ago.....
--
--
"Foley, we should have known it was you...."
--From the movie Beverly Hills Cop.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:09:43 -0700 (PDT), My Land of Misery
<grvan@netzero . net > wrote:
>I'm surprised I beat necromancer to the punch on this....
> * w w w .worldofnecromancer.org/pics/page2.html
Well, at 2100, I was at my favorite Italian restaurant enjoying a
calzone. I didn't get home untill about 2145 and didn't turn on the
computer till a few minutes ago.....
--
--
"Foley, we should have known it was you...."
--From the movie Beverly Hills Cop.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
>
> The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> vehicle accessories.
>
> Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> protested.
>
> The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
>
>
>
Guess they ran out of wacky stop light configurations to set up and
manatees to teach how to drive in Florida.
What's next? Spitting on the sidewalk ordinances? Voting for the state
mineral like they did in Missouri?
What a waste of time.
Take care,
Rich
God bless the USA
--
Pat Paulsen (1927-1997) for President - 2008
Even though he's dead it makes about much sense
to vote for him as it does for the choices
that we have who are living. At least he's not
going change his position on anything.
Fujikawa Yamamoto wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Senate lawmakers in Florida have voted
> to ban the fake bull testicles that dangle from the trailer hitches of
> many trucks and cars throughout the state.
>
> Republican Sen. Cary Baker, a gun shop owner from Eustis, Florida,
> called the adornments offensive and proposed the ban. Motorists would be
> fined $60 for displaying the novelty items, which are known by brand
> names like "Truck Nutz" and resemble the south end of a bull moving
> north.
>
> The Florida Senate voted last week to add the measure to a broader
> transportation bill, but it is not included in the House version.
>
> In a spirited debate laced with double entendre, Senate lawmakers
> questioned whether the state should curtail freedom of expression in
> vehicle accessories.
>
> Critics of the ban included the Senate Rules Chairman, Sen. Jim King, a
> Jacksonville Republican whose truck sported a pair until his wife
> protested.
>
> The bill's sponsor doubted it would succeed.
>
> "It's probably not going to make it through the process," Baker said on
> Thursday. "It won't be much of story in a few days."
>
>
>
Guess they ran out of wacky stop light configurations to set up and
manatees to teach how to drive in Florida.
What's next? Spitting on the sidewalk ordinances? Voting for the state
mineral like they did in Missouri?
What a waste of time.
Take care,
Rich
God bless the USA
--
Pat Paulsen (1927-1997) for President - 2008
Even though he's dead it makes about much sense
to vote for him as it does for the choices
that we have who are living. At least he's not
going change his position on anything.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
<amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
"balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
included as they are part of those genitals.
Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
<amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
"balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
included as they are part of those genitals.
Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Apr 28, 10:26 pm, richard <i.do....@ca.re> wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
>
> <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> > * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>
> If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> included as they are part of those genitals.
>
> Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
Scrotum...testicles...testes...gonads...genitals...balls...nuts...same
parts. Parts is parts. Guess live shots of boars (hogs) is out of
the question.
Sometimes you feel like a nut....
On Apr 28, 10:26 pm, richard <i.do....@ca.re> wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
>
> <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
> > * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>
> If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> included as they are part of those genitals.
>
> Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
Scrotum...testicles...testes...gonads...genitals...balls...nuts...same
parts. Parts is parts. Guess live shots of boars (hogs) is out of
the question.
Sometimes you feel like a nut....
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
"richard" <i.do.not@ca.re> wrote in message
news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
> On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
> <amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>
>> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>>
>
>
> All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>
> If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> included as they are part of those genitals.
They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yourself
would know the term.
>
> Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>
Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
"richard" <i.do.not@ca.re> wrote in message
news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
> On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
> <amm-j@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>
>> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>>
>
>
> All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>
> If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> included as they are part of those genitals.
They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yourself
would know the term.
>
> Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>
Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Apr 30, 10:34 pm, "Orson Wells as CitizenCain"
<noem...@here.invalid> wrote:
> "richard" <i.do....@ca.re> wrote in message
>
> news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
>
> > On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
> > <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>
> >> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> > All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> > "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>
> And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>
>
>
> > If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> > included as they are part of those genitals.
>
> They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yoursel=
f
> would know the term.
>
>
>
> > Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>
> Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
"Working," eh...OK, won't take that typo to its easy conclusion.
Also, testes is a correct wording as well.
On Apr 30, 10:34 pm, "Orson Wells as CitizenCain"
<noem...@here.invalid> wrote:
> "richard" <i.do....@ca.re> wrote in message
>
> news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
>
> > On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
> > <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>
> >> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>
> > All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
> > "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>
> And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>
>
>
> > If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
> > included as they are part of those genitals.
>
> They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yoursel=
f
> would know the term.
>
>
>
> > Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>
> Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
"Working," eh...OK, won't take that typo to its easy conclusion.
Also, testes is a correct wording as well.
Re: State moves to ban fake testicles on vehicles
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:16:13 -0700 (PDT), MLOM <grvan@netzero . net > wrote:
>On Apr 30, 10:34 pm, "Orson Wells as CitizenCain"
><noem...@here.invalid> wrote:
>> "richard" <i.do....@ca.re> wrote in message
>>
>> news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
>>
>> > On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
>> > <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>>
>> >> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>>
>> > All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
>> > "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>>
>> And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>>
>>
>>
>> > If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
>> > included as they are part of those genitals.
>>
>> They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yourself
>> would know the term.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>>
>> Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
>
>"Working," eh...OK, won't take that typo to its easy conclusion.
>
>Also, testes is a correct wording as well.
whatever, where can I get real bull testicles since they want to outlaw fake
ones?
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:16:13 -0700 (PDT), MLOM <grvan@netzero . net > wrote:
>On Apr 30, 10:34 pm, "Orson Wells as CitizenCain"
><noem...@here.invalid> wrote:
>> "richard" <i.do....@ca.re> wrote in message
>>
>> news:v35d14dq3j5i4bghhj994rfhmk84ev0cdv@4ax . com ...
>>
>> > On 29 Apr 2008 03:02:00 +0200, Fujikawa Yamamoto
>> > <am...@now-flushed.org> wrote:
>>
>> >> * w w w .reuters . com /article/newsOne/idUSN4O32105020080425
>>
>> > All this started over one photo showing a squirrel with faked,
>> > "balls". Caption reading, "Who you callin' Tiny?".
>>
>> And your source on that is what exactly, Bullis?
>>
>>
>>
>> > If it's illegal to show the male genitals, then the "balls" must be
>> > included as they are part of those genitals.
>>
>> They're called testicles, st00pid. Not that a redneck halfwit like yourself
>> would know the term.
>>
>>
>>
>> > Correct wording should be "scrotum" but "balls" says it more proper.
>>
>> Correct working would be testicles, you dumbshit.
>
>"Working," eh...OK, won't take that typo to its easy conclusion.
>
>Also, testes is a correct wording as well.
whatever, where can I get real bull testicles since they want to outlaw fake
ones?
