Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
Conspiracy mongers.
It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian Lake
was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
Check just how far it is for yourself here.
http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
Graham
T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
Conspiracy mongers.
It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian Lake
was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
Check just how far it is for yourself here.
http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
Graham
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:45DC0607.C101618@hotmail,com ...
>
>
> T_R_U_T_H wrote:
>
>> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>
> United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> Conspiracy mongers.
>
> It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> Lake
> was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>
> Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>
> http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
Bollocks
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
news:45DC0607.C101618@hotmail,com ...
>
>
> T_R_U_T_H wrote:
>
>> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>
> United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> Conspiracy mongers.
>
> It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> Lake
> was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>
> Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>
> http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
Bollocks
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
Michael wrote:
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> >
> >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
> >
> > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > Conspiracy mongers.
> >
> > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
> >
> > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
> >
> > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
> >
> > Graham
>
>
> Bollocks
The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
Graham
Michael wrote:
> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> >
> >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
> >
> > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > Conspiracy mongers.
> >
> > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
> >
> > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
> >
> > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
> >
> > Graham
>
>
> Bollocks
The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
Graham
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
On Feb 21, 9:32 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com >
wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > > T R U T H wrote:
>
> > >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>
> > > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > > Conspiracy mongers.
>
> > > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>
> > > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>
> > > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N...
>
> > > Graham
>
> > Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
Like youŽd know you fjukkwit netttkop
On Feb 21, 9:32 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com >
wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > > T R U T H wrote:
>
> > >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>
> > > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > > Conspiracy mongers.
>
> > > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>
> > > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>
> > > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N...
>
> > > Graham
>
> > Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
Like youŽd know you fjukkwit netttkop
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
In article <45DCAC57.50E40E03@hotmail,com >,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> > >
> > >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
> > >
> > > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > > Conspiracy mongers.
> > >
> > > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
> > >
> > > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
> > >
> > > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%
> > > C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.02
> > > 2437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>
> >
> > Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of
> 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
"Michael" apparently thought that the URL was actually an exposition of
your position in the argument.
Either that, or he read the "1,000 ft" scale at the lower left corner of
the page as miles or light years. Hard to say.
In article <45DCAC57.50E40E03@hotmail,com >,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote:
> Michael wrote:
>
> > "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in message
> > > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
> > >
> > >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
> > >
> > > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris' proves it say the 9/11
> > > Conspiracy mongers.
> > >
> > > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the debris seen at Indian
> > > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
> > >
> > > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
> > >
> > > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%
> > > C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.02
> > > 2437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>
> >
> > Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable to have the kind of
> 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell exposed ?
"Michael" apparently thought that the URL was actually an exposition of
your position in the argument.
Either that, or he read the "1,000 ft" scale at the lower left corner of
the page as miles or light years. Hard to say.
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in
message news:45DCAC57.50E40E03@hotmail,com ...
>
> Michael wrote:
>
>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote
>> in message
>> > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
>> >
>> >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>> >
>> > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris'
>> > proves it say the 9/11
>> > Conspiracy mongers.
>> >
>> > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the
>> > debris seen at Indian
>> > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>> >
>> > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>> >
>> > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>> >
>> > Graham
>>
>> Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable
> to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell
> exposed ?
>
> Graham
The link provided by I_D_I_O_T went to a page that was
nothing more than an echo tank, more idiots posting drivel
within their claque - nothing factual, despite a claim that
two newscasters were reading from a common script. Where's
the beef?
Whether or not the walrus in the Beatles cover-up conspiracy
was Paul, here's a little clue for you all: Sometimes blogs
have an insider group that deliberately trolls other sites
and newsgroups with over-the-top enticements and a link, not
because they necessarily think that anyone will believe or
agree with what's at the other end of the link - quite the
contrary, they're hoping that you don't, because they're
trying to boost traffic counts. Every visit and/or posting
gets counted, and if a reasonable person is foolish enough
to respond on the blog to the effect that they're all
idiots, then that gives the blog's claque an excuse to post
another full round of messages saying that you're the
idiot - thereby further boosting traffic - and back and
forth until the victim gives up.
Sometimes that's for commercial purposes to attract
sponsors, but at the least, they're hoping to show up on the
various reports that track and publish web traffic. Making
it onto one of these lists is the blog equivalent of
breaking into the major leagues.
(Full disclosure: Many years ago, I was astonished to find
myself on one of those lists. I was somewhat far down, in
the 20's, but it amazed me nonetheless. It was during a
week when Tarver and I were cranked up to a full-bore flame
war. Given today's web trafffic levels, I'm sure I wouldn't
have placed in the top 500.)
This technique isn't limited to the konspirowacko sites, but
that's probably what's happening here. If they happen to
attract another Global Village Idiot who is delighted to
find that he's not alone in his fears and delusions, then
that's just an added bonus.
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote in
message news:45DCAC57.50E40E03@hotmail,com ...
>
> Michael wrote:
>
>> "Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail,com > wrote
>> in message
>> > T_R_U_T_H wrote:
>> >
>> >> http :// www .911researchers,com /node/241
>> >
>> > United 93 was shot down and the 'trail of debris'
>> > proves it say the 9/11
>> > Conspiracy mongers.
>> >
>> > It was claimed by the "9/11 movement" that that the
>> > debris seen at Indian
>> > Lake was 6-8 miles from the crash site.
>> >
>> > Check just how far it is for yourself here.
>> >
>> > http :// maps.google,com /maps?f=q&hl=en&q=40%C2%B03%E2%80%B28%E2%80%B3N,+78%C2%B053%E2%80%B237%E2%80%B3W&ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=40.050548,-78.884711&spn=0.022437,0.04313&t=k&om=1
>> >
>> > Graham
>>
>> Bollocks
>
> The sattelite photo is bollocks ? Is it too uncomfortable
> to have the kind of 'truth' the conspiracy nuts tell
> exposed ?
>
> Graham
The link provided by I_D_I_O_T went to a page that was
nothing more than an echo tank, more idiots posting drivel
within their claque - nothing factual, despite a claim that
two newscasters were reading from a common script. Where's
the beef?
Whether or not the walrus in the Beatles cover-up conspiracy
was Paul, here's a little clue for you all: Sometimes blogs
have an insider group that deliberately trolls other sites
and newsgroups with over-the-top enticements and a link, not
because they necessarily think that anyone will believe or
agree with what's at the other end of the link - quite the
contrary, they're hoping that you don't, because they're
trying to boost traffic counts. Every visit and/or posting
gets counted, and if a reasonable person is foolish enough
to respond on the blog to the effect that they're all
idiots, then that gives the blog's claque an excuse to post
another full round of messages saying that you're the
idiot - thereby further boosting traffic - and back and
forth until the victim gives up.
Sometimes that's for commercial purposes to attract
sponsors, but at the least, they're hoping to show up on the
various reports that track and publish web traffic. Making
it onto one of these lists is the blog equivalent of
breaking into the major leagues.
(Full disclosure: Many years ago, I was astonished to find
myself on one of those lists. I was somewhat far down, in
the 20's, but it amazed me nonetheless. It was during a
week when Tarver and I were cranked up to a full-bore flame
war. Given today's web trafffic levels, I'm sure I wouldn't
have placed in the top 500.)
This technique isn't limited to the konspirowacko sites, but
that's probably what's happening here. If they happen to
attract another Global Village Idiot who is delighted to
find that he's not alone in his fears and delusions, then
that's just an added bonus.
Re: 9/11/01 - Comparison Between NYC TV News Clips Proves Media Involvement
> T R U T H wrote:
Why is it that the biggest lies are published by people under the nick
of truth when its painfully apparent they've never looked up the
meaning of the word ...
> T R U T H wrote:
Why is it that the biggest lies are published by people under the nick
of truth when its painfully apparent they've never looked up the
meaning of the word ...
