Re: Paging Michael JohnsonJoe wrote:
> Michael Johnson <cds@erols,com > wrote in
> news:MeudnQcFA8oKisXVnZ2dnUVZ qHinZ2d@giganews,com :
>
>> Joe wrote:
>>> Michael Johnson <cds@erols,com > wrote in
>>> news:9rGdnWSymLEtucrVnZ2dnUVZ ovinZ2d@giganews,com :
>>>
>>>> Namehere wrote:
>>>>> "Michael Johnson" <cds@erols,com > wrote in message
>>>>> news:JvOdneR j bJiMrVnZ2dnUVZ q inZ2d@giganews,com ...
>>>>>> Big Al wrote:
>>>>>>> "Michael Johnson" <cds@erols,com > wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:lfGdnbcbjaSDTcvVnZ2dnUVZ ovinZ2d@giganews,com ...
>>>>>>>> Big Al wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "Michael Johnson" <cds@erols,com > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:W KdnQ7C 6kYKcvVnZ2dnUVZ hOdnZ2d@giganews,com ...
>>>>>>>>>> Big Al wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any links to dyno curves for the modded
>>>>>>>>>>> Cobra/Lightning engines? Looking for HP and torque and
> general
>>>>>>>>>>> "under the curve" specs. Nothing too outrageous, just the
> guy's
>>>>>>>>>>> that change injectors and do easy mods.
>>>>>>>>>> Which engines? The OHC ones, push rod and/or supercharged?
>>>>>>>>> Sorry, the newere Cobra DOHC supercharged. You told me they
> were
>>>>>>>>> getting great numbers and living.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http :// www .lxforums,com /board/showthread.php?p10065
>>> #post1610065
>>>>>>>> The most popular and easiest high hp mod for the blown Cobras
> and
>>>>>>>> Lightnings are the Kenne Bell twin screw blower kits. Here are
>>>>>>>> some links and the numbers they show on the graphs are good and
>>>>>>>> realistic:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http :// www .kennebell,net /superchargers/ford/Shelby/Shelby.htm
>>>>>>>> http :// www .kennebell,net /media/articles/SNAKEBITE.pdf
>>>>>>>> http :// www .kennebell,net /superchargers/ford/cobra03/cobra03.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You should see what they are getting from the turbocharged 4.6L
>>>>>>>> Cobra engines without even taking off the valve covers. You are
>>>>>>>> 100% right. I should. Now where are they? :)
>>>>>> If this doesn't do it for you nothing will. It is a turbo kit
> that
>>>>>> mounts in front of the stock Eaton blower on a stock Terminator
>>>>>> engine. Here is an excerpt from the article:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The kit featured here is universal and can be used with a
>>>>>> supercharger or without it-the difference will be in the
>>>>>> turbocharger sizing to fit different applications. The piping and
>>>>>> turbo mounting is universal in all systems and mod-motor
>>>>>> applications. For those brave enough and in need of the excess,
>>>>>> check out the turbo/ supercharger system. It will not disappoint
>>>>>> your appetite for ridiculous power levels. We watched this setup
>>>>>> throw out a certifiably insane 1,188 rwhp and an even more
>>>>>> impressive 1,015 rwtq-through a stock engine including the factory
>>>>>> cast-iron exhaust manifolds."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If 1,188 RWHP and 1,015 rwtq isn't enough to prove the point then
>>>>>> NOTHING will. Here's a link to the full article:
>>>>>> http :// tinyurl,com /6o28aq
>>>>> gosh, I drive around town an typically use less than 150 HP, take
>>>>> off sometimes using 320 HP, but 1,200 HP is totally undrivable
> except
>>>>> on a stright track.
>>>>> Think of it in terms of the gas petal travel, 1/4 the way in is
>>>>> 300HP, and the back wheels would be spinning out.
>>>> They talk about the problems they had keeping the wheels from
> spinning
>>>> on the dyno drum. Driving that car on public streets isn't for the
>>>> faint of heart or anyone with restless leg syndrome. The fact that
> a
>>>> stock Terminator engine can do several dyno pulls making well over
>>>> 1,000 rwhp shows just how strong that engine was built and how much
>>>> performance potential Ford left untapped with it. We may never see
>>>> another one like it in our lifetimes.
>>> Looks like quite a fun ride, but I have to wonder how durable it
> really
>>> is. I'd like to see that car in 6 months or so...
>> I'm impressed a stock engine can make several dyno runs at that power
>> level and survive at all.
>
> True, but pure logic begs questioning the reliability of such a setup.
> As an engineer, I'm sure you know what I mean. :)
I think that setup might last longer than expected. Other parts of the
drive train would like fail before the engine. Plus if the wheels spin
then much of the strain is off the engine and other parts. The truth
is, I don't think it is known just where the breaking point is for that
motor.
>> I'm sure something will eventually break on
>> it but that setup is a testament to the strength of that engine. It
> is
>> built like a brick shit house.
>
> Granted, that motor is built extremely well. But there is a balance
> between power levels and reliability. It would be interesting to see
> that graph.
I don't see that car serving as a daily driver. Besides, that much
power is unusable on the street so the engine would likely never be
stressed driving around town. As I said above, I don't think the graph
has been drawn yet for that engine. I can't think of another production
engine that can deliver the hp/litre it can with stock parts.