Re: 1997 Saturn - 2 issues
"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail . com > wrote in message
news:KeTak.13930$mh5.1275@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc . com ...
snip
> It's a common misconception. In the olden days timing chains were much
> shorter and the expected "life of the car" was a lot shorter as well.
> Saturn timing chains have a history of early failures. You need to go
> beyond personal experience with one vehicle and get the view of a mechanic
> that's worked on hundreds of vehicles. Read
> " * groups.google . com /group/rec.autos.makers.saturn/msg/4d43014a06ae4d3b"
> for more information.
snip
IMHO
For those of you who are not regular readers of this NG it is worth noting
that Steve Scharf (SMS) is the major proponent of the Saturn timing chain
needs to be changed theory. For a more complete research into this issue I
suggest reading
* groups.google . com /group/rec.autos.makers.saturn/browse_thread/thread/a1287e3fa7a9c78/9c8657e6a0fc0675
or do a search in Google Groups for other and more recent threads.
As in all such things there is no definitive correct answer and nobody can
accurately predict the service life of an individual mechanical component.
This is especially true of preowned vehicles. Most reports of failures are
anecdotal and can be considered anomalies.
Mechanical service life is a bit of a crap shoot that is influenced by
maintenance and operating conditions and driving style. Most people lump
the SOHC and the DOHC engines together when reporting service issues such as
oil consumption and valve train wear. Engine wear increases are not linear
with speed and are normally considered to increase at the square of the
engine speed. In other words wear will be 4 times higher @ 6000rpm than at
3000rpm. DOHC engines are much more likely to be driven in a 'spirited'
manner and IMHO are much more likely to suffer issues of oil consumption and
valve train wear as well as reduced tire and brake life. For this reason
(and lower fuel economy) I would never purchase a used DOHC.
Beyond original warranty, there are no guaranties of service life and engine
lifetime management becomes a balance between doing nothing and perhaps
incurring a costly failure and overdoing preventative maintenance which
results in added expense from fixing stuff that aint broke, as well as
issues caused by the quality of the repair work. Repair work seldom has the
quality control of the original factory. Regular maintenance and oil
changes are the cheapest and most cost effective way to lengthen service
life especially when combined with proper warm up in cold weather and the
avoidance of 'spirited' high rpm operation and short trips.
As these cars age the benefits of excessive preventative repair become
smaller as does the cost of any needed repair due to catastrophic failure.
The economics of engine management is that a catastrophic failure is less of
a loss on an engine nearing the end of its service life than if it occurs
near the start. If you really want to maximize service life some would
advocate a half life rebuild including new rings bearings and valve guides,
and a new timing chain would certainly be appropriate at that time. However
most of us know that such a rebuild does not add any resale value to the car
and we prefer to continue use until some problem occurs at which time we can
make the repair or replace decision at that time.
As this model ages they are now quite common in the scrap yards and we have
more options for economical repair. A good used engine can now be purchased
for very little more than the cost of replacing a timing chain. A complete
running car with good tires and battery will only be a little more (or
less). I just purchased a very good running car with near new tires and
battery (and a new stereo/CD player )for $400. It had a little easily
repairable body damage and drives very well, I have repaired the damage but
this would have been an excellent donor car to use for spare parts. These
cars are easy to work on and a little DIY mechanical can save a LOT of
money.
Good luck, YMMV