Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Reunification is a distinct possibilty
Reunification is a distinct possibilty
The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
apologize to all they have wronged.
The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
apologize to all they have wronged.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:28:54 -0800, "RickyBobby" <nascar42@cox,net >
wrote:
>The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
>reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
>apologize to all they have wronged.
>
You are such a manly man, Ricky. I bet you smell good too. Would you
be my man/bitch? I could show you the intense pleasure of gerbil love.
Wanting to love you as if you were a man,
Jimmy Sue
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http :// www .teranews,com
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:28:54 -0800, "RickyBobby" <nascar42@cox,net >
wrote:
>The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
>reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
>apologize to all they have wronged.
>
You are such a manly man, Ricky. I bet you smell good too. Would you
be my man/bitch? I could show you the intense pleasure of gerbil love.
Wanting to love you as if you were a man,
Jimmy Sue
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http :// www .teranews,com
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
alot
of apologizing to do.
-Sterling
RickyBobby wrote:
> The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
> reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> apologize to all they have wronged.
The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
alot
of apologizing to do.
-Sterling
RickyBobby wrote:
> The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity by
> reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> apologize to all they have wronged.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"sterlingla" <sterlingla@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> alot
> of apologizing to do.
>
> -Sterling
>
> RickyBobby wrote:
> > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
by
> > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
"sterlingla" <sterlingla@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> alot
> of apologizing to do.
>
> -Sterling
>
> RickyBobby wrote:
> > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
by
> > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > alot
> > of apologizing to do.
>
> > -Sterling
>
> > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
> by
> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > alot
> > of apologizing to do.
>
> > -Sterling
>
> > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
> by
> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > > alot
> > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > -Sterling
> >
> > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
dignity
> > by
> > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
well
> > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > > alot
> > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > -Sterling
> >
> > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
dignity
> > by
> > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
well
> > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > > > alot
> > > > of apologizing to do.
>
> > > > -Sterling
>
> > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> dignity
> > > by
> > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
> well
> > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
> Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United States Automobile Club
I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
perceived as a joke.
On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > > > alot
> > > > of apologizing to do.
>
> > > > -Sterling
>
> > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> dignity
> > > by
> > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
> well
> > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
> Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United States Automobile Club
I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
perceived as a joke.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've
got
> > > > > alot
> > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> > dignity
> > > > by
> > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may
as
> > well
> > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
>
> http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
>
Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> perceived as a joke.
>
Apparently that's true for you, and other
incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
Funny how the current home of that which made
CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
as a joke.
More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
(Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
made an offer, which she declined) that have been
receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
opposed to the chumps who have to console
themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
dead last on two of three days) only after having
finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've
got
> > > > > alot
> > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> > dignity
> > > > by
> > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may
as
> > well
> > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
>
> http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
>
Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> perceived as a joke.
>
Apparently that's true for you, and other
incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
Funny how the current home of that which made
CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
as a joke.
More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
(Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
made an offer, which she declined) that have been
receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
opposed to the chumps who have to console
themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
dead last on two of three days) only after having
finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
On Feb 5, 4:16 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've
> got
> > > > > > alot
> > > > > > of apologizing to do.
>
> > > > > > -Sterling
>
> > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> > > dignity
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may
> as
> > > well
> > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
> > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
>
> > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United States Automobile Club
>
> Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
Define "unified with" then.
On Feb 5, 4:16 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've
> got
> > > > > > alot
> > > > > > of apologizing to do.
>
> > > > > > -Sterling
>
> > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
> > > dignity
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may
> as
> > > well
> > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
>
> > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
>
> > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United States Automobile Club
>
> Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
Define "unified with" then.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170732865.476946.235220@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 5, 4:16 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
They've
> > got
> > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency
and
> > > > dignity
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they
may
> > as
> > > > well
> > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
>
> Define "unified with" then.
>
Unified is a quite commonly understood term, any
dictionary can define it for you. Perhaps you should
understand the meaning of a word before you use it.
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170732865.476946.235220@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 5, 4:16 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
They've
> > got
> > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency
and
> > > > dignity
> > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they
may
> > as
> > > > well
> > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
>
> Define "unified with" then.
>
Unified is a quite commonly understood term, any
dictionary can define it for you. Perhaps you should
understand the meaning of a word before you use it.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
On Feb 2, 2:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > alot
> > of apologizing to do.
>
> > -Sterling
>
> > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
> by
> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
Unified? What are you Clintonesquely parsing words to make it seem
something other than USAC being engaged in oral copulation with the
IRL? You're just a lying clown.
http :// www .theautochannel,com /news/date/19970618/news003447.html
It came as no surprise to anyone in the world of motorsports: the new
Indy Racing League has dis-affiliated itself from U.S.A.C., The United
States Auto Club, a racing organization comprised of some very nice,
but very old men. USAC, which was actively involved with the formation
of the IRL, has proved that they cannot officiate big time auto
racing. This was very evident at the Indy 500, where USAC started the
last lap of "the greatest spectacle in racing" with both yellow and
green flags flying. Then they screwed up naming the winner of the
Texas IRL race last week, and it took all night to determine that Arie
Luyendyk won the thing by two laps over A.J. Foyt's two drivers. Foyt
punched out Arie, and USAC said they will take no disciplinary action
against the Texan, as they, USAC precipitated the fracas by naming the
wrong winner. IRL boss Tony George will remain on USAC's board. His
Grandfather, Tony Hulman was one of the founders of the open wheel
racing sanctioning body, who's offices are on the grounds of the Indy
speedway, a race they will no longer be involved with.
On Feb 2, 2:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>
> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>
> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
> > alot
> > of apologizing to do.
>
> > -Sterling
>
> > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and dignity
> by
> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as well
> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>
> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
Unified? What are you Clintonesquely parsing words to make it seem
something other than USAC being engaged in oral copulation with the
IRL? You're just a lying clown.
http :// www .theautochannel,com /news/date/19970618/news003447.html
It came as no surprise to anyone in the world of motorsports: the new
Indy Racing League has dis-affiliated itself from U.S.A.C., The United
States Auto Club, a racing organization comprised of some very nice,
but very old men. USAC, which was actively involved with the formation
of the IRL, has proved that they cannot officiate big time auto
racing. This was very evident at the Indy 500, where USAC started the
last lap of "the greatest spectacle in racing" with both yellow and
green flags flying. Then they screwed up naming the winner of the
Texas IRL race last week, and it took all night to determine that Arie
Luyendyk won the thing by two laps over A.J. Foyt's two drivers. Foyt
punched out Arie, and USAC said they will take no disciplinary action
against the Texan, as they, USAC precipitated the fracas by naming the
wrong winner. IRL boss Tony George will remain on USAC's board. His
Grandfather, Tony Hulman was one of the founders of the open wheel
racing sanctioning body, who's offices are on the grounds of the Indy
speedway, a race they will no longer be involved with.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Low Rider" <merdetta@yahoo,com > wrote in message
news:1170463024.288085.193050@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 2:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
>> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>>
>> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>>
>> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
>> > alot
>> > of apologizing to do.
>>
>> > -Sterling
>>
>> > RickyBobby wrote:
>> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
>> > > dignity
>> by
>> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
>> > > well
>> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>>
>> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
>> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
>> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
>
> Unified? What are you Clintonesquely parsing words to make it seem
> something other than USAC being engaged in oral copulation with the
> IRL? You're just a lying clown.
>
> http :// www .theautochannel,com /news/date/19970618/news003447.html
>
> It came as no surprise to anyone in the world of motorsports: the new
> Indy Racing League has dis-affiliated itself from U.S.A.C., The United
> States Auto Club, a racing organization comprised of some very nice,
> but very old men. USAC, which was actively involved with the formation
> of the IRL, has proved that they cannot officiate big time auto
> racing. This was very evident at the Indy 500, where USAC started the
> last lap of "the greatest spectacle in racing" with both yellow and
> green flags flying. Then they screwed up naming the winner of the
> Texas IRL race last week, and it took all night to determine that Arie
> Luyendyk won the thing by two laps over A.J. Foyt's two drivers. Foyt
> punched out Arie, and USAC said they will take no disciplinary action
> against the Texan, as they, USAC precipitated the fracas by naming the
> wrong winner. IRL boss Tony George will remain on USAC's board. His
> Grandfather, Tony Hulman was one of the founders of the open wheel
> racing sanctioning body, who's offices are on the grounds of the Indy
> speedway, a race they will no longer be involved with.
>
All that is, is just coincidence. Really, it is.
Beaner
"Low Rider" <merdetta@yahoo,com > wrote in message
news:1170463024.288085.193050@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 2:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
>> "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
>>
>> news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
>>
>> > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL. They've got
>> > alot
>> > of apologizing to do.
>>
>> > -Sterling
>>
>> > RickyBobby wrote:
>> > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of decency and
>> > > dignity
>> by
>> > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose they may as
>> > > well
>> > > apologize to all they have wronged.
>>
>> Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
>> might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
>> were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
>
> Unified? What are you Clintonesquely parsing words to make it seem
> something other than USAC being engaged in oral copulation with the
> IRL? You're just a lying clown.
>
> http :// www .theautochannel,com /news/date/19970618/news003447.html
>
> It came as no surprise to anyone in the world of motorsports: the new
> Indy Racing League has dis-affiliated itself from U.S.A.C., The United
> States Auto Club, a racing organization comprised of some very nice,
> but very old men. USAC, which was actively involved with the formation
> of the IRL, has proved that they cannot officiate big time auto
> racing. This was very evident at the Indy 500, where USAC started the
> last lap of "the greatest spectacle in racing" with both yellow and
> green flags flying. Then they screwed up naming the winner of the
> Texas IRL race last week, and it took all night to determine that Arie
> Luyendyk won the thing by two laps over A.J. Foyt's two drivers. Foyt
> punched out Arie, and USAC said they will take no disciplinary action
> against the Texan, as they, USAC precipitated the fracas by naming the
> wrong winner. IRL boss Tony George will remain on USAC's board. His
> Grandfather, Tony Hulman was one of the founders of the open wheel
> racing sanctioning body, who's offices are on the grounds of the Indy
> speedway, a race they will no longer be involved with.
>
All that is, is just coincidence. Really, it is.
Beaner
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"scottscottscott" <scottrevision@yahoo,com > wrote in message
news:1170460744.480526.27160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 5:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
>
>
> > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> The IRL was associated with USAC from its first race in 1996 until
> USAC was fired for incompetence during the 1997 season, thereby
> severing the IRL from any possible legitimacy as the successor to the
> AAA and USAC national championships.
>
Seems justified, there was nothing legitimate about
the IRL in its early days. That is now, of course,
ancient history and the situation, with respect to ccws,
has shifted 180 degrees, with the latter now being the
joke.
"scottscottscott" <scottrevision@yahoo,com > wrote in message
news:1170460744.480526.27160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 2, 5:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
>
>
> > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
>
> The IRL was associated with USAC from its first race in 1996 until
> USAC was fired for incompetence during the 1997 season, thereby
> severing the IRL from any possible legitimacy as the successor to the
> AAA and USAC national championships.
>
Seems justified, there was nothing legitimate about
the IRL in its early days. That is now, of course,
ancient history and the situation, with respect to ccws,
has shifted 180 degrees, with the latter now being the
joke.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170776968.341938.259180@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 6, 5:56 am, "ncrdbl1" <mphsric...@aol,com > wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 4:16?pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > >news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
?They've
> > > got
> > > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of
decency and
> > > > > dignity
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose
they may
> > > as
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> >
> > > > I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> > > > perceived as a joke.
> >
> > > Apparently that's true for you, and other
> > > incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
> >
> > > Funny how the current home of that which made
> > > CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
> > > Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
> > > Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
> > > later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
> > > easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
> > > and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
> > > categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
> > > as a joke.
> >
> > > More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
> > > (Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
> > > made an offer, which she declined) that have been
> > > receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
> > > opposed to the chumps who have to console
> > > themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
> > > Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
> > > dead last on two of three days) only after having
> > > finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
> > > consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
> >
> > > The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > For the most part IRL supporters have maintained the moral high
> > ground. Let's not lower ourselves to the level of some CCWS supporters
> > by resorting in name calling even if it is just the word "chump". We
> > have facts and truth our side we do not need to get down in the gutter
> > with those who do not.
>
> Rumors and lies, yes, truth and facts, no.
>
What a specific, issue-oriented, documented,
fact-filled and devastatingly contested rebuttal.
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170776968.341938.259180@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 6, 5:56 am, "ncrdbl1" <mphsric...@aol,com > wrote:
> > On Feb 5, 4:16?pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > >news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
?They've
> > > got
> > > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of
decency and
> > > > > dignity
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to lose
they may
> > > as
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> >
> > > > I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> > > > perceived as a joke.
> >
> > > Apparently that's true for you, and other
> > > incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
> >
> > > Funny how the current home of that which made
> > > CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
> > > Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
> > > Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
> > > later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
> > > easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
> > > and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
> > > categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
> > > as a joke.
> >
> > > More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
> > > (Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
> > > made an offer, which she declined) that have been
> > > receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
> > > opposed to the chumps who have to console
> > > themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
> > > Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
> > > dead last on two of three days) only after having
> > > finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
> > > consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
> >
> > > The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > For the most part IRL supporters have maintained the moral high
> > ground. Let's not lower ourselves to the level of some CCWS supporters
> > by resorting in name calling even if it is just the word "chump". We
> > have facts and truth our side we do not need to get down in the gutter
> > with those who do not.
>
> Rumors and lies, yes, truth and facts, no.
>
What a specific, issue-oriented, documented,
fact-filled and devastatingly contested rebuttal.
Re: Reunification is a distinct possibilty
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170779948.175251.268130@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 6, 10:21 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170776968.341938.259180@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 6, 5:56 am, "ncrdbl1" <mphsric...@aol,com > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 5, 4:16?pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > >news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
> > ?They've
> > > > > got
> > > > > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of
> > decency and
> > > > > > > dignity
> > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to
lose
> > they may
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > > > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > > > > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> >
> > > > > > I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> > > > > > perceived as a joke.
> >
> > > > > Apparently that's true for you, and other
> > > > > incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
> >
> > > > > Funny how the current home of that which made
> > > > > CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
> > > > > Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
> > > > > Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
> > > > > later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
> > > > > easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
> > > > > and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
> > > > > categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
> > > > > as a joke.
> >
> > > > > More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
> > > > > (Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
> > > > > made an offer, which she declined) that have been
> > > > > receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
> > > > > opposed to the chumps who have to console
> > > > > themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
> > > > > Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
> > > > > dead last on two of three days) only after having
> > > > > finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
> > > > > consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
> >
> > > > > The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > For the most part IRL supporters have maintained the moral high
> > > > ground. Let's not lower ourselves to the level of some CCWS
supporters
> > > > by resorting in name calling even if it is just the word "chump". We
> > > > have facts and truth our side we do not need to get down in the
gutter
> > > > with those who do not.
> >
> > > Rumors and lies, yes, truth and facts, no.
> >
> > What a specific, issue-oriented, documented,
> > fact-filled and devastatingly contested rebuttal.
>
> I thought it was clear and to the point.
>
As earlier expressed, an incapable of your ilk would.
"Dave-E" <davegto67@aol,com > wrote in message
news:1170779948.175251.268130@a34g2000cwb.googlegroups,com ...
> On Feb 6, 10:21 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > news:1170776968.341938.259180@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 6, 5:56 am, "ncrdbl1" <mphsric...@aol,com > wrote:
> > > > On Feb 5, 4:16?pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> >
> > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > >news:1170616064.983983.131810@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > On Feb 4, 8:12 am, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > "Dave-E" <davegt...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > >news:1170457123.337568.211140@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > On Feb 2, 4:46 pm, "." <....@dot,com > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > "sterlingla" <sterlin...@aol,com > wrote in message
> >
> > > > > > > > >news:1170188693.344387.25210@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups,com ...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > The "alphabet soup guys" must be a reference to the IRL.
> > ?They've
> > > > > got
> > > > > > > > > > alot
> > > > > > > > > > of apologizing to do.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > -Sterling
> >
> > > > > > > > > > RickyBobby wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > The alphabet soup guys could still gain a measure of
> > decency and
> > > > > > > dignity
> > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > reunifying with USAC. When one has nothing left to
lose
> > they may
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > apologize to all they have wronged.
> >
> > > > > > > > > Given your statement "must be a reference to the IRL",
> > > > > > > > > might you kindly inform one and all as to when the IRL
> > > > > > > > > were unified with USAC? Thanx, it's most appreciated.
> >
> > > > > > > > USAC was the sanctioning body for the IRL from 1996-1997
> >
> > > > > > > Cite? In any case, prior to about 2002, the IRL
> > > > > > > was correctly perceived as something of a joke.
> >
> > > > > > http :// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Automobile_Club
> >
> > > > > Sanctioning body for, yes, unified with the IRL, hardly.
> >
> > > > > > I would say prior to, during and beyond 2002 the IRL has been
> > > > > > perceived as a joke.
> >
> > > > > Apparently that's true for you, and other
> > > > > incapables that can't distinguish the difference.
> >
> > > > > Funny how the current home of that which made
> > > > > CART profitable (the Andrettis, Penske, Ganassi,
> > > > > Mears, Unsers, Rahal, De Ferran, Castroneves,
> > > > > Franchitti, Indy 500, TV exposure, all of which
> > > > > later aligned with the IRL), and the series of racing's
> > > > > easily most well known (sorry Shirley Muldowney)
> > > > > and competitve female open wheel driver, would be
> > > > > categorized by the incompetent and envious chumps
> > > > > as a joke.
> >
> > > > > More recently, it is and has been the IRL drivers
> > > > > (Andretti, Wheldon, Kanaan ... even Danica was
> > > > > made an offer, which she declined) that have been
> > > > > receiving tests and/or offers with top F1 teams, as
> > > > > opposed to the chumps who have to console
> > > > > themselves with a test with an F1 bottom dweller.
> > > > > Even at that, a test was offered (at which he ran
> > > > > dead last on two of three days) only after having
> > > > > finished first, in a non-competitive series, three
> > > > > consectutive years (and in nearly every race).
> >
> > > > > The chumps are truly only kidding themselves.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> > > > For the most part IRL supporters have maintained the moral high
> > > > ground. Let's not lower ourselves to the level of some CCWS
supporters
> > > > by resorting in name calling even if it is just the word "chump". We
> > > > have facts and truth our side we do not need to get down in the
gutter
> > > > with those who do not.
> >
> > > Rumors and lies, yes, truth and facts, no.
> >
> > What a specific, issue-oriented, documented,
> > fact-filled and devastatingly contested rebuttal.
>
> I thought it was clear and to the point.
>
As earlier expressed, an incapable of your ilk would.
