---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

Reunification please.

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
> Reunification please.

No, just death to the infidel.


That would be TG, in case you were wondering...

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

Dave-E wrote:
> On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>> Reunification please.
>
> No, just death to the infidel.
>
>
> That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>

Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?

--
forty

“To embrace an extreme, one must first let go of reason.”

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------



forty wrote:

> Dave-E wrote:
>
>> On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>>
>>> Reunification please.
>>
>>
>> No, just death to the infidel.
>>
>>
>> That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>>
>
> Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?

Disembowelment?

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

On Feb 20, 7:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
> forty wrote:
> > Dave-E wrote:
>
> >> On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>
> >>> Reunification please.
>
> >> No, just death to the infidel.
>
> >> That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>
> > Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>
> Disembowelment?

As long as it happens on the yard of bricks and is televised!

The pay-per-view event of the millenium!

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

Dave-E wrote:

> On Feb 20, 7:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
>
>>forty wrote:
>>
>>>Dave-E wrote:
>>
>>>>On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Reunification please.
>>
>>>>No, just death to the infidel.
>>
>>>>That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>>
>>>Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>>
>>Disembowelment?
>
>
> As long as it happens on the yard of bricks and is televised!
>
> The pay-per-view event of the millenium!

Considering the current interest level surrounding Indy, it might not
draw many viewers.

I think it would be more fitting to hold the event as part of the
pre-race festivities at the Nextel Cup [insert sponsor name here] 600.
It is now more important than the "other" races held that weekend.

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

On Feb 20, 9:20 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
> Dave-E wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 7:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
>
> >>forty wrote:
>
> >>>Dave-E wrote:
>
> >>>>On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Reunification please.
>
> >>>>No, just death to the infidel.
>
> >>>>That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>
> >>>Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>
> >>Disembowelment?
>
> > As long as it happens on the yard of bricks and is televised!
>
> > The pay-per-view event of the millenium!
>
> Considering the current interest level surrounding Indy, it might not
> draw many viewers.
>
> I think it would be more fitting to hold the event as part of the
> pre-race festivities at the Nextel Cup [insert sponsor name here] 600.
> It is now more important than the "other" races held that weekend.

True, but I'd sure pay $19.95 to see it live. I'd also buy the DVD...

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

On Feb 20, 8:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
> forty wrote:
> > Dave-E wrote:
>
> >> On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>
> >>> Reunification please.
>
> >> No, just death to the infidel.
>
> >> That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>
> > Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>
> Disembowelment?

Lobotomy? It could be done as outpatient surgery on the
bricks ...considering the small brain he has.

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------



Lenny wrote:
> On Feb 20, 8:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
>
>>forty wrote:
>>
>>>Dave-E wrote:
>>
>>>>On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>>
>>>>>Reunification please.
>>
>>>>No, just death to the infidel.
>>
>>>>That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>>
>>>Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>>
>>Disembowelment?
>
>
> Lobotomy? It could be done as outpatient surgery on the
> bricks ...considering the small brain he has.
>

No way. The required electron microscope would not be a practical tool
when used outdoors.

Re: ---------- 8< ---------- CUT NONSENSE HERE ---------- 8< ----------

On Feb 21, 10:05 am, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
> Lenny wrote:
> > On Feb 20, 8:41 pm, xorbit <xor...@nospam.ca> wrote:
>
> >>forty wrote:
>
> >>>Dave-E wrote:
>
> >>>>On Feb 20, 7:24 am, "cowoffunk" <c...@of.funk> wrote:
>
> >>>>>Reunification please.
>
> >>>>No, just death to the infidel.
>
> >>>>That would be TG, in case you were wondering...
>
> >>>Well, death is a little harsh. Tartarus, perhaps?
>
> >>Disembowelment?
>
> > Lobotomy? It could be done as outpatient surgery on the
> > bricks ...considering the small brain he has.

TG at a press conference: "Ummm ....uhhh well.... mmm..."
>
> No way. The required electron microscope would not be a practical tool
> when used outdoors.

Not enough blood and gore either. Would not make for "must see TV"