Re: Dumbos back...Agent 86 wrote:
>
> "Bigbird" <Bigbird.UsenetREMOVTHS@Gmail,com > wrote in message
> news:xn0foz1yf95dsdw002@news.individual,net ...
> > Agent 86 wrote:
> >
> > >
> >>"Bigbird" <Bigbird.UsenetREMOVTHS@Gmail,com > wrote in message
> > > news:xn0foyo3s8mmo3s007@news.individual,net ...
> > > >
> >>> http :// www .formula1,com /photos/597x478/manual/deh0815ap33.jpg
> > > >
> >>> and he has friends
> > > >
> >>> http :// www .formula1,com /photos/597x478/manual/deh0815ap49.jpg
> > > >
> >>> -- This space has deliberately not been left blank.
> >>> If you would like to advertise here f*ck off!
> > >
> >
> > Is the problem with my sig separator or with you?
> >
> > > Dumbo? Nae.
> >
> > For any other noobs the original "Dumbo Wings" referred to were
> > tested by Honda in May last year.
> >
> >
http :// f1chronicles,com /wp-content/uploads/2007/05/honda-dumbo-wings.jpg
> >
> > -- This space has deliberately not been left blank.
> > If you would like to advertise here f*ck off!
> >
>
...with you obviously.
> It's your choice to refer to yourself as a Sesame Street character
> and dub aerofoils beyond your comprehension with a 1941 Disney star
> animated character while claiming to dislike advertising. Nobody has
> coerced you into being the imbecile that you are. Since you're so
> obviously a 'noob', you wouldn't know that these devices are older
> than "Dumbo."
<sigh>
You are just making yourself look even more stupid now.
Sheesh, you can't help some people.
--
This space has deliberately not been left blank.
If you would like to advertise here f*ck off!