Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to group Search:
Post Subject:
Alonso might very well be God.
Alonso might very well be God.
Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
>> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
>> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
>> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>
> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired* last
year.
"Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
>> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
>> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
>> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>
> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired* last
year.
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>
> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula
>>> 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me
>>> from saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to
>>> do that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>>
>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>
> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired*
> last year.
But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
(C) McLaren Excuse Generator
--
CatharticF1
The thinking man:
"They say Kimi's ice-cool, like he's flat-lined, but I think my
subconscious is pretty much like that"
Gracious:
"I was able to trick him into out-braking himself .. I apologise for that
but .. we got the points, so it doesn't really matter."
And from humble beginnings:
"..avoid getting caught up with all the monkeys at the back."
Lewis Hamilton
"gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>
> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula
>>> 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me
>>> from saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to
>>> do that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>>
>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>
> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired*
> last year.
But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
(C) McLaren Excuse Generator
--
CatharticF1
The thinking man:
"They say Kimi's ice-cool, like he's flat-lined, but I think my
subconscious is pretty much like that"
Gracious:
"I was able to trick him into out-braking himself .. I apologise for that
but .. we got the points, so it doesn't really matter."
And from humble beginnings:
"..avoid getting caught up with all the monkeys at the back."
Lewis Hamilton
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"CatharticF1" <rasf1poster@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:Xns9A8D5C7E15CF5rasf1postergmailcom@203.26.24.228...
> "gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>
>>
>> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
>> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula
>>>> 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me
>>>> from saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to
>>>> do that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>>>
>>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>>
>> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired*
>> last year.
>
> But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
> (C) McLaren Excuse Generator
So it was different last year when Ferrari fans were crying that McLaren
only went fast because they had stolen data because.... You can't have it
both ways you know (whatever you tell your boyfriend).
"CatharticF1" <rasf1poster@gmail . com > wrote in message
news:Xns9A8D5C7E15CF5rasf1postergmailcom@203.26.24.228...
> "gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>
>>
>> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
>> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula
>>>> 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me
>>>> from saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to
>>>> do that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>>>
>>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>>
>> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they *acquired*
>> last year.
>
> But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
> (C) McLaren Excuse Generator
So it was different last year when Ferrari fans were crying that McLaren
only went fast because they had stolen data because.... You can't have it
both ways you know (whatever you tell your boyfriend).
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fv1eib$s8n$1@aioe.org:
>
> "CatharticF1" <rasf1poster@gmail . com > wrote in message
> news:Xns9A8D5C7E15CF5rasf1postergmailcom@203.26.24.228...
>> "gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>>
>>> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>>>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a
>>>>> Formula 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing
>>>>> preventing me from saying he is God is the fact that not even God
>>>>> would manage to do that. So, who or what kind of entity is
>>>>> Alonso?.
>>>>
>>>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>>>
>>> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they
>>> *acquired* last year.
>>
>> But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
>> (C) McLaren Excuse Generator
>
> So it was different last year when Ferrari fans were crying that
> McLaren only went fast because they had stolen data because.... You
> can't have it both ways you know (whatever you tell your boyfriend).
Are you even self aware?
How can it have been right last year but wrong now?
Did you not realise that I was pointing out your hypocrisy?
Turn around and you'll find joy.
(which incidentally is what you told *your* bf..)
--
CatharticF1
The thinking man:
"They say Kimi's ice-cool, like he's flat-lined, but I think my
subconscious is pretty much like that"
Gracious:
"I was able to trick him into out-braking himself .. I apologise for that
but .. we got the points, so it doesn't really matter."
And from humble beginnings:
"..avoid getting caught up with all the monkeys at the back."
Lewis Hamilton
"gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fv1eib$s8n$1@aioe.org:
>
> "CatharticF1" <rasf1poster@gmail . com > wrote in message
> news:Xns9A8D5C7E15CF5rasf1postergmailcom@203.26.24.228...
>> "gs" <gs@NOSPAM . com > wrote in news:fuvb74$5q3$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>>
>>> "Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>>>> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>>>>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a
>>>>> Formula 1 race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing
>>>>> preventing me from saying he is God is the fact that not even God
>>>>> would manage to do that. So, who or what kind of entity is
>>>>> Alonso?.
>>>>
>>>> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
>>>
>>> Yep, Renault have finally made sense of all that data they
>>> *acquired* last year.
>>
>> But how can you go faster using someone else's data?
>> (C) McLaren Excuse Generator
>
> So it was different last year when Ferrari fans were crying that
> McLaren only went fast because they had stolen data because.... You
> can't have it both ways you know (whatever you tell your boyfriend).
Are you even self aware?
How can it have been right last year but wrong now?
Did you not realise that I was pointing out your hypocrisy?
Turn around and you'll find joy.
(which incidentally is what you told *your* bf..)
--
CatharticF1
The thinking man:
"They say Kimi's ice-cool, like he's flat-lined, but I think my
subconscious is pretty much like that"
Gracious:
"I was able to trick him into out-braking himself .. I apologise for that
but .. we got the points, so it doesn't really matter."
And from humble beginnings:
"..avoid getting caught up with all the monkeys at the back."
Lewis Hamilton
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
>> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
>> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
>> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>
> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
God is not imaginary. The ability of a mortal to understand God may be
lacking, but there is still a higher power or creationary power. Humans did
not evolve from a muck oozing out of a sea. That would take about a
thousand billion years even if it were possible. A dog has a reproductive
cycle of about a year and we have been breeding dogs for at least five
thousand years and a dog today is no smarter than a dog five thousand years
ago. A logical person with no agenda can make as cogent an argument against
evolution as an agnostict can make against the concept of God. There are
sorts of turtles and sharks and crocs that the scientists tell us are
identical to those of hundreds of thousands of years ago. So where is the
evolution?
My feeling is that humans are the sole species with an intellect so that we
can ponder, or worship if we choose, the existence of a power or entity much
greater than gravity or chemistry or biology. Or a person can even deny the
existence of any sort of higher power.
If you were to eliminate everything you know and believe and just start your
thought process with a blank slate there is no need for life of any sort.
There could perfectly well be a universe, or a couple of universes, or many
universes that are active and are created and collapse and so on with no
form of life as we know it. It would all be heat and light and gravity and
energy.
I say again, the reason that even a dumb person (me) has ten thousand times
the intellect of the brightest chimp is so that I have just enough intellect
to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
"Dolf" <ey@as . com .invalid> wrote in message
news:g6GQj.342807$jD7.114117@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> The Cunt of Monte Cristo kirjoitti:
>> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
>> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
>> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
>> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
>
> God is imaginary, Alonso just drove really fast.
God is not imaginary. The ability of a mortal to understand God may be
lacking, but there is still a higher power or creationary power. Humans did
not evolve from a muck oozing out of a sea. That would take about a
thousand billion years even if it were possible. A dog has a reproductive
cycle of about a year and we have been breeding dogs for at least five
thousand years and a dog today is no smarter than a dog five thousand years
ago. A logical person with no agenda can make as cogent an argument against
evolution as an agnostict can make against the concept of God. There are
sorts of turtles and sharks and crocs that the scientists tell us are
identical to those of hundreds of thousands of years ago. So where is the
evolution?
My feeling is that humans are the sole species with an intellect so that we
can ponder, or worship if we choose, the existence of a power or entity much
greater than gravity or chemistry or biology. Or a person can even deny the
existence of any sort of higher power.
If you were to eliminate everything you know and believe and just start your
thought process with a blank slate there is no need for life of any sort.
There could perfectly well be a universe, or a couple of universes, or many
universes that are active and are created and collapse and so on with no
form of life as we know it. It would all be heat and light and gravity and
energy.
I say again, the reason that even a dumb person (me) has ten thousand times
the intellect of the brightest chimp is so that I have just enough intellect
to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
RickyBobby wrote...
<Snipped holy joe bollocks>
>
>
They're right. Crossing the Atlantic puts a stop to evolution.
RickyBobby wrote...
<Snipped holy joe bollocks>
>
>
They're right. Crossing the Atlantic puts a stop to evolution.
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
Jon wrote:
> RickyBobby wrote...
>
> <Snipped holy joe bollocks>
>
> They're right. Crossing the Atlantic puts a stop to evolution.
Which direction?
Cheers
Geoff
Jon wrote:
> RickyBobby wrote...
>
> <Snipped holy joe bollocks>
>
> They're right. Crossing the Atlantic puts a stop to evolution.
Which direction?
Cheers
Geoff
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
> God is not imaginary. The ability of a mortal to understand God may be
> lacking, but there is still a higher power or creationary power. Humans
> did not evolve from a muck oozing out of a sea.
Proving you know as much about science and evolution of the species as you
do about F1 (i.e. Fuck All).
I can't even be arsed to respond to the rest of the bollocks you posted. You
are right though, god is not imaginary, as imaginary beings are at least
believable at times, god does not exist - it's really that simple (just like
your parents Ricky).
> God is not imaginary. The ability of a mortal to understand God may be
> lacking, but there is still a higher power or creationary power. Humans
> did not evolve from a muck oozing out of a sea.
Proving you know as much about science and evolution of the species as you
do about F1 (i.e. Fuck All).
I can't even be arsed to respond to the rest of the bollocks you posted. You
are right though, god is not imaginary, as imaginary beings are at least
believable at times, god does not exist - it's really that simple (just like
your parents Ricky).
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
In article <QuMQj.173883$nr1.99038@newsfe13.phx>, nascar42@cox . net
says...
> I say again, the reason that even a dumb person (me) has ten thousand times
> the intellect of the brightest chimp is so that I have just enough intellect
> to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
>
You flatter yourself.
--
Alan LeHun
In article <QuMQj.173883$nr1.99038@newsfe13.phx>, nascar42@cox . net
says...
> I say again, the reason that even a dumb person (me) has ten thousand times
> the intellect of the brightest chimp is so that I have just enough intellect
> to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
>
You flatter yourself.
--
Alan LeHun
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:44:31 -0700, "RickyBobby" <nascar42@cox . net >
wrote:
>to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
>
The sperm bank is not an entity... ;-)
--
Regards, Frank
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:44:31 -0700, "RickyBobby" <nascar42@cox . net >
wrote:
>to appreciate having been created by some entity beyond my understanding.
>
The sperm bank is not an entity... ;-)
--
Regards, Frank
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"The Cunt of Monte Cristo" <totaltrek2000@yahoo . com > wrote in message
news:01936e33-1d5a-439a-8d66-5820bc29d30c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups . com ...
>
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
And you spunk of Hamilton hype?
AC
"The Cunt of Monte Cristo" <totaltrek2000@yahoo . com > wrote in message
news:01936e33-1d5a-439a-8d66-5820bc29d30c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups . com ...
>
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
And you spunk of Hamilton hype?
AC
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
The only thing preventing me from> > saying he is God is the fact
that ---
INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL RASF1 SERVICE:
I have temporarily recalled the mortal Alonso from the world, and
regrettably our debriefing may prevent his return in time for your
"Grand Prix".
However, after I have fixed his hair and teeth (Sorry about those, I
was in a hurry) and adjusted his Tantrum Index, you may expect Alonso
back shortly.
In the meantime I have arranged for Lewis Hamilton to win the race.
Keep up the prayers, you never know when I might be listening. Online
signed, God: "Giving You What You Deserve for Ten Thousand Years"
RESUMING NORMAL RASF1 SERVICE:
----- not even God would manage to do that. So, who or what kind
of entity is Alonso?. AC
The only thing preventing me from> > saying he is God is the fact
that ---
INTERRUPTION OF NORMAL RASF1 SERVICE:
I have temporarily recalled the mortal Alonso from the world, and
regrettably our debriefing may prevent his return in time for your
"Grand Prix".
However, after I have fixed his hair and teeth (Sorry about those, I
was in a hurry) and adjusted his Tantrum Index, you may expect Alonso
back shortly.
In the meantime I have arranged for Lewis Hamilton to win the race.
Keep up the prayers, you never know when I might be listening. Online
signed, God: "Giving You What You Deserve for Ten Thousand Years"
RESUMING NORMAL RASF1 SERVICE:
----- not even God would manage to do that. So, who or what kind
of entity is Alonso?. AC
Re: Alonso might very well be God.
"The Cunt of Monte Cristo" <totaltrek2000@yahoo . com > wrote in message
news:01936e33-1d5a-439a-8d66-5820bc29d30c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups . com ...
>
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
Alonso's a cunt.
"The Cunt of Monte Cristo" <totaltrek2000@yahoo . com > wrote in message
news:01936e33-1d5a-439a-8d66-5820bc29d30c@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups . com ...
>
> Alonso driving a bycicle finishes second in qualifying for a Formula 1
> race right in between 2 Ferraris. The only thing preventing me from
> saying he is God is the fact that not even God would manage to do
> that. So, who or what kind of entity is Alonso?.
Alonso's a cunt.
