Re: If Vettel really believes he's the new Schumacher...AC wrote:
>
> "armpit" <armarmpitpit@yahoo . com > wrote in message
> news:xeydndReytRgF47VnZ2dnUVZ uKpnZ2d@giganews . com ...
> >
> >"AC" <xxxx@xxxx.xxx> wrote in message
> news:aBLQj.70365$Ff4.19264@newsfe5-win.ntli . net ...
> > >
> >>"ric zito" <address@in.sig> wrote in message
> news:1ig0oxv.1vfjg6t1avahsyN%address@in.sig...
> > > > ...then he might want to try and get ahead of Bourdais first.
> > > > It's starting to look embarassing, being regularly beaten by a
> > > > guy from a "second-rate" series. :-P
> > > >
> > > > -- ric at pixelligence dot com
> > >
> > > So we rate Indy/Cart below GP2?
> > >
> > > AC
> >
> > I suspect Bourdais would have been rather successful in GP2.
He might well have been.
> > He
> > pretty much owned Champ Car for 4 years straight, amassing 28 wins
> > in 41 starts during those 4 title seasons.
> >
> > You can't gage his success by the quality of CCWS competition,
> > because when he was there, he had none.
> >
>
> Unless I missunderstand you, I think you missed my point.
>
> To put down Bourdais because he was dominant in the so called second
> rate series, would mean that GP2 is even more second rate as it is
> clearly a stage down from Indy/Cart. So, if one is putting down
> Bourdais, one must also logically write off all the drivers who came
> from GP2. Which is clearly dumb.
>
There is no logic to paragraph.
I don't think anyone has put down Bourdais for his dominance in CCWS
but rather that deductions about the status of CCWS might be made from
Bourdais form in F1.
--
Pitwall is an online F1 manager game where you receive a team and need
to develop the team to get on the top podium position! Pitwall is
entirely free! No sh*t!
* tinyurl . com /5y6ls3