On Thu, 01 May 2008 15:56:38 GMT, The Wizard wrote:
> "Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:67u64iF2qdvtqU1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Jon" <me@privvy.net> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.2283ed1c9bee00c49896f6@66.250.146.159...
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/7377543.stm
>>>
>>> Brands Hatch has signed a deal to reduce noise and disturbances at its
>>> events.
>>>
>>>
>>> Brands grew up in the middle of nowhere just after the last war, yet
>>> people have built and bought houses right up to the fencing on the long
>>> circuit. It's not like the morons don't know it's there, yet the first
>>> thing they do once they've moved in, is complain about the noise.
>>>
>>> It's one of the best tracks in the UK, much more testing than
>>> Silverstone and now they've lost all chance of ever staging another F1
>>> race. What a pity.
>>
>> Cretins. It's like those people who buy close to airports then complain
>> about the noise. Dickheads.
>
> Not always, Sometimes people have lived there for years and obviously the
> noise level must have gone up.
>
> As for airports, What about when a new runway is built bringing planes
> closer to properties?
>
> I diagree with new runways anyway, They're only built to bring even more
> immigrants into countries!
I'm sure the majority of complaints are from the newbies who are living in
what is otherwise a very desirable area (leafy countryside, easy access to
London etc).
To be fair to Brands there can't be many local residents who are *still
alive* who heard the first races there circa 1950, and they're probably
suffering from age-related hearing loss anyway ;^o