Add group to favorites
Back to post list
Send new message to groupPost Subject:
Who'd want to be the 43rd "most consistent" anything?
Top 50 is too much. Let's stick with the top 5. 43rd means nothing
at all ---- and how much of a real difference can there be in the
"consistency" in racing between #43 and #44 or 50 for that matter?
Anyway, I kind of like the inconsistent ones --- more fun. Hunn,
Mansell, Rindt.
at all ---- and how much of a real difference can there be in the
"consistency" in racing between #43 and #44 or 50 for that matter?
Anyway, I kind of like the inconsistent ones --- more fun. Hunn,
Mansell, Rindt.
On May 2, 4:18 pm, "brafi...@hotmail.com" <brafi...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Top 50 is too much. Let's stick with the top 5. 43rd means nothing
> at all ---- and how much of a real difference can there be in the
> "consistency" in racing between #43 and #44 or 50 for that matter?
>
> Anyway, I kind of like the inconsistent ones --- more fun. Hunn,
> Mansell, Rindt.
"Hunn" wasn't a mad Germanic driver. "Hunn" was a typo. "Hmmm".
wrote:
> Top 50 is too much. Let's stick with the top 5. 43rd means nothing
> at all ---- and how much of a real difference can there be in the
> "consistency" in racing between #43 and #44 or 50 for that matter?
>
> Anyway, I kind of like the inconsistent ones --- more fun. Hunn,
> Mansell, Rindt.
"Hunn" wasn't a mad Germanic driver. "Hunn" was a typo. "Hmmm".
