Max Perv not so sure...

He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it seem
that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his no-Nazi-bits
claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the rest of his
behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!

http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508

"ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it seem
> that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his no-Nazi-bits
> claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the rest of his
> behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>
> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>

Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral disgust
over Bitch Slap Boy?

No!

What a fucking surprise.

"Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>
> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it seem
>> that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his no-Nazi-bits
>> claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the rest of his
>> behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>
>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>
>
> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
> droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral
> disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>
> No!
>
> What a fucking surprise.
>

Yeah, but thats SPain.

AC

"Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>
> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it seem
>> that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his no-Nazi-bits
>> claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the rest of his
>> behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>
>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>
>
> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
> droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral
> disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>
> No!
>
> What a fucking surprise.
>

No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a slapper's
interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is rancid) but that
does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based our lives on what
companies do, society would fail. They are disloyal thieving twats.

A fair workable moral code is needed for life as we know it to exist.
Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What Max Perv
advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and exploitation
should not be promoted.

Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act does
not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be acceptable to
start with. In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you please.
Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap is outside
of that compromise and rightly so - violence against each other is not to be
promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc to be
encouraging them.

BTW F1 is not all bad. In this case, it is a cancer in its midst that should
be cut out. Society is not generally bad it is the few who at times fuck it
up for the many. We remove them to stop the rot...

"ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:482099f2$0$10631$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>
> "Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
> news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>>
>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it
>>> seem that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his
>>> no-Nazi-bits claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the
>>> rest of his behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>>
>>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>>
>>
>> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
>> droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral
>> disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>>
>> No!
>>
>> What a fucking surprise.
>>
>
> No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a slapper's
> interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is rancid) but that
> does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based our lives on what
> companies do, society would fail. They are disloyal thieving twats.
>
> A fair workable moral code is needed for life as we know it to exist.
> Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What Max
> Perv advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and
> exploitation should not be promoted.

Max hasn't advocated anything to do with his sex life. He's just said it's
his own business, he was filmed "secretly" and it got into public domain.
It's not as though he's running S&M seminars now is it?
>
> Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act does
> not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be acceptable
> to start with.

But who decides what behaviour is acceptable or not? Things I find morally
right might be repulsive to others, and activities others like may be
reprehensible to me.

>>In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you please.
> Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap is
> outside of that compromise and rightly so

Why? It would have stayed his own business if it were not for NOTW. Don't
get me wrong, I don't like the man or what he's done for F1 *racing* (not
safety) and I think he should go as the head of a major international
organisation cannot possibly be able to do his job correctly with this
hanging over him.

- violence against each other is not to be
> promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc to be
> encouraging them.

How is Max getting his rocks off with a few (highly paid) tarts encouraging
gun crime?


Mike P

Mike P wrote:
> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:482099f2$0$10631$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>>
>> "Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
>> news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>>>
>>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>>>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make
>>>> it seem that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his
>>>> no-Nazi-bits claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets
>>>> that the rest of his behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>>>
>>>
>>> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having
>>> bolted in droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1
>>> out of moral disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>>>
>>> No!
>>>
>>> What a fucking surprise.
>>>
>>
>> No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a
>> slapper's interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is
>> rancid) but that does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based
>> our lives on what companies do, society would fail. They are
>> disloyal thieving twats. A fair workable moral code is needed for life as
>> we know it to exist.
>> Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What
>> Max Perv advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and
>> exploitation should not be promoted.
>
> Max hasn't advocated anything to do with his sex life. He's just said
> it's his own business, he was filmed "secretly" and it got into
> public domain. It's not as though he's running S&M seminars now is it?
>>
>> Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act
>> does not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be
>> acceptable to start with.
>
> But who decides what behaviour is acceptable or not? Things I find
> morally right might be repulsive to others, and activities others
> like may be reprehensible to me.
>
>>> In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you please.
>> Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap is
>> outside of that compromise and rightly so
>
> Why? It would have stayed his own business if it were not for NOTW. Don't
> get me wrong, I don't like the man or what he's done for F1
> *racing* (not safety) and I think he should go as the head of a major
> international organisation cannot possibly be able to do his job
> correctly with this hanging over him.
>
> - violence against each other is not to be
>> promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc to be
>> encouraging them.
>
> How is Max getting his rocks off with a few (highly paid) tarts
> encouraging gun crime?

Actually, they weren't highly paid - he paid £2,500 for five hours with five
of them, which works out at £100 per hour each. Perhaps he got the OAP
discount...
--
John Briggs

"John Briggs" <john.briggs4@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:gRfUj.109057$Ff4.86962@newsfe5-win.ntli.net...
> Mike P wrote:
>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:482099f2$0$10631$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>>>
>>> "Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
>>> news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>>>>
>>>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>>> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>>>>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make
>>>>> it seem that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his
>>>>> no-Nazi-bits claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets
>>>>> that the rest of his behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having
>>>> bolted in droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1
>>>> out of moral disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>>>>
>>>> No!
>>>>
>>>> What a fucking surprise.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a
>>> slapper's interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is
>>> rancid) but that does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based
>>> our lives on what companies do, society would fail. They are
>>> disloyal thieving twats. A fair workable moral code is needed for life
>>> as we know it to exist.
>>> Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What
>>> Max Perv advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and
>>> exploitation should not be promoted.
>>
>> Max hasn't advocated anything to do with his sex life. He's just said
>> it's his own business, he was filmed "secretly" and it got into
>> public domain. It's not as though he's running S&M seminars now is it?
>>>
>>> Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act
>>> does not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be
>>> acceptable to start with.
>>
>> But who decides what behaviour is acceptable or not? Things I find
>> morally right might be repulsive to others, and activities others
>> like may be reprehensible to me.
>>
>>>> In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you please.
>>> Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap is
>>> outside of that compromise and rightly so
>>
>> Why? It would have stayed his own business if it were not for NOTW. Don't
>> get me wrong, I don't like the man or what he's done for F1
>> *racing* (not safety) and I think he should go as the head of a major
>> international organisation cannot possibly be able to do his job
>> correctly with this hanging over him.
>>
>> - violence against each other is not to be
>>> promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc to be
>>> encouraging them.
>>
>> How is Max getting his rocks off with a few (highly paid) tarts
>> encouraging gun crime?
>
> Actually, they weren't highly paid - he paid £2,500 for five hours with
> five of them, which works out at £100 per hour each. Perhaps he got the
> OAP discount...

Well, if £100 an hour doesn't class as "highly paid" then I don't know what
does!

Mike P

"Mike P" <privacy@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:68d7u4F2sjnc8U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:482099f2$0$10631$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>>
>> "Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
>> news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>>>
>>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>>>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it
>>>> seem that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his
>>>> no-Nazi-bits claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the
>>>> rest of his behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>>>
>>>
>>> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
>>> droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral
>>> disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>>>
>>> No!
>>>
>>> What a fucking surprise.
>>>
>>
>> No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a slapper's
>> interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is rancid) but that
>> does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based our lives on what
>> companies do, society would fail. They are disloyal thieving twats.
>>
>> A fair workable moral code is needed for life as we know it to exist.
>> Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What Max
>> Perv advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and
>> exploitation should not be promoted.
>
> Max hasn't advocated anything to do with his sex life. He's just said it's
> his own business, he was filmed "secretly" and it got into public domain.
> It's not as though he's running S&M seminars now is it?
>>
Yes he has advocated that his behaviour is acceptable. Read what he has
said - he expects society to approve of his behaviour by accepting him as
head of the FIA. He is also asking the FIA to vote to keep him in office;
but that will be a vote basically about his sexual behaviour; they will, if
they vote for him, be saying that such perverted behaviour is perfectly
acceptable.

>> Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act does
>> not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be acceptable
>> to start with.
>
> But who decides what behaviour is acceptable or not? Things I find morally
> right might be repulsive to others, and activities others like may be
> reprehensible to me.
>
On an individual level that is so; but generally there is an acceptable
norm. We all decide what is acceptable - we via elected govt enact laws
about it all the time. What's acceptable obviously changes over time and is
in many ways quite broad. But there are limits to 'acceptable behaviour'
that seem to remain constant. Violence is one such constant - MOST by far do
not like violence and don't want to encourage it. It is classed as perverted
behaviour...

>>>In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you please.
>> Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap is
>> outside of that compromise and rightly so
>
> Why? It would have stayed his own business if it were not for NOTW. Don't
> get me wrong, I don't like the man or what he's done for F1 *racing* (not
> safety) and I think he should go as the head of a major international
> organisation cannot possibly be able to do his job correctly with this
> hanging over him.
>
The fact that it is out cannot be put back. He has a legal case with NOTW -
so the courts will decide whether they went too far. I reckon he was the
twerp in this since HE filmed it. Did he not see that as a high profile
person he was open to such a thing? Of course he did, but he got 'cocky'.
That was a risk he took. Same newspaper would be lauded if it dug the dirt
on say a paedophile politician or another Fritzl...

I note that at virtually any other company would have seen him resign at
once. Why does F1 behave differently? My guess is that Max Perv is a power
mad loony who controls the whole thing. This latest QC lark is typical. Who
in his right mind would take the word of a paid employee? That's like
expecting one of those presenters on QVC to tell the truth.

> - violence against each other is not to be
>> promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc to be
>> encouraging them.
>
> How is Max getting his rocks off with a few (highly paid) tarts
> encouraging gun crime?
>
If we accept his violent sexual behaviour we tacitly encourage it and this
would be done publicly. We'd be saying it's okay to receive or inflict pain
on others. I note it was violence directed at women... That is not a road I
want us to go down.

>
> Mike P
>

"ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:482099f2$0$10631$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk...
>
> "Agent 86" <agent86@control.org> wrote in message
> news:51a63$48208aab$cf702823$20894@PRIMUS.CA...
>>
>> "ME" <mememememememe@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:482069fa$0$2484$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk...
>>> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it
>>> seem that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his
>>> no-Nazi-bits claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the
>>> rest of his behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>>>
>>> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>>>
>>
>> Those Barcelona stands were so barren, all the sponsors having bolted in
>> droves, and doubtless you've ceased all interest in F1 out of moral
>> disgust over Bitch Slap Boy?
>>
>> No!
>>
>> What a fucking surprise.
>>
>
> No fuckn surprise how low you draw the line. Maybe you have a slapper's
> interest in it... Money has no soul (corporate greed is rancid) but that
> does not make his behaviour acceptable. If we based our lives on what
> companies do, society would fail. They are disloyal thieving twats.

Are you some kinda preacher?


The FIA presidency is a pro bono position. Mosley isn't paid. And there's
no law against prostitution in England.

>
> A fair workable moral code is needed for life as we know it to exist.
> Exploitation is vile. Decadence is an enemy of decent society. What Max
> Perv advocates is unacceptable to a decent society - violence and
> exploitation should not be promoted.

'scuse me, but do you see 800lb gorillas holding those lollipops on the
pre-race grids or pit babes? If so, what inference can you draw about F1
from this, Dr. Sue?

>
> Yes I know about consent. Just because two or more consent to an act does
> not make it legally or morally right. The behaviour has to be acceptable
> to start with. In a decent society you do not get to do exactly as you
> please. Most of what we do is a reasonable compromise. This Max Perv crap
> is outside of that compromise and rightly so - violence against each other
> is not to be promoted. We have too many thugs with knives, guns, boots etc
> to be encouraging them.

What the hell is wrong with you. Rupert Murdoch boob-cammed the guy in
sissy fit revenge for the FIA's lawsuit and sell his slimy rags. Murdoch is
the most reviled snake since William Randolph Hearst.

Violence? What's your government been doing in Afghanistan and Iraq for the
past several years? And how on earth could an ass-slapping floozie morally
compare to that?

>
> BTW F1 is not all bad. In this case, it is a cancer in its midst that
> should be cut out. Society is not generally bad it is the few who at times
> fuck it up for the many. We remove them to stop the rot...

Then start with Jackie Stewart and his bullshit mouthpiecing for banks
trying to seize controlling ownership of F1 to pad his retirement nest egg.

ME wrote...

> He's frightened he'll lose at the FIA EGA. So he's trying to make it seem
> that he's been 'judged' innocent to convince the FIA of his no-Nazi-bits
> claim by appointing his own puppet QC. He forgets that the rest of his
> behaviour is just as odious - friggin slapper!
>
> http://www.itv-f1.com/news_article.aspx?id=42508
>
>
>

The news of the screws sent the FIA a 5 hour long DVD of what took
place. A copy of this will be given to Anthony Scrivener as evidence to
confirm what Mad Max says too place. Due to new rulz just announced by
mad max the FIA copy is now only 5 minutes long, the remaining 4hrs 55
minutes had to removed for 'safety reasons'.