On 9 May 2008 10:36:04 GMT, "Bigbird"
<Bigbird.UsenetREMOVTHS@Gmail.com> wrote:
>Frank Adam wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 20:26:22 -0700 (PDT), FrankLardino@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> >On May 8, 8:18 pm, "Tony" <some...@cox.net> wrote:
>> >> "Clyde Penquin" <penguink...@springmind.com> wrote in message
>> > >
>> >> news:7bqdnedkJrfQzL7VnZ2dnUVZ_tuonZ2d@earthlink.com...
>> > >
>> >> > forty wrote:
>> > >
>> >> >> Bernie Ecclestone in Turkey tried to put a positive spin on the
>> Super >> >> Aguri collapse, as his F1 grid dwindles to just ten teams.
>> > >
>> >> >> "More room," he answered.
>> > >
>> >> >> "It means we have a lot more room now because the teams are
>> expanding >> >> like crazy with their hospitality units and their
>> trucks and everything.
>> > >
>> >> > Bernie has all the warmth and charm of an iguana.
>> > >
>> >> > But he's much richer, and not as tall.
>> > >
>> >> Or as good looking, for that matter.
>> >
>> > I recall that Bernie bashed a young Nick Wirth who founded the
>> > Simtek team back in the early to mid 1990s. They did a pretty good
>> > job with zero money. Nick was trying to save his creation.
>> > Bernie, at the time, said he wish Nick would "stop going around
>> > with a begging bowl" trying to save Simtek. It really sickened me.
>> > He could care less.
>> >
>> Hate to be cruel, but F1 is a rich man's game and only those rich
>> enough should apply.
>> For Bernie to see teams struggling to make each race, would be similar
>> to watching a guy with 5,000 bucks to his name walking into the high
>> rollers room at a casino and sit down at the poker table.
>> Which, as far as i know, won't be allowed, but if it were, the guy
>> would be murdered within minutes by those with real money..
>> It's a bit like that with Aguri and while we all love to see the
>> underdogs in F1, in a way it is a very cruel thing. Kinda like
>> watching a fish out of water slowly wriggling to death.
>>
>> Sad, but that is reality and i think Bernie deals with reality. There
>> is nothing new to him being a greedy business man and nothing else.
>> He's been that way for as long as we remember and to him, F1 is pure
>> business, where tender fuzzy feelings don't belong.
>
>I don't think SA were looking that sad on the race track last year.
>
I didn't say they did.
>They were frequently challenging and beating better funded teams not
>least of all the A-team...of course we don't really know the full story
>on the funding...but they didn't appear to be fish out of water.
>
How long do you think they could fund taking the baby steps against
teams with proper cash flow ? As we've just found out, this long.
A new team is always exciting, because we can follow their quick
progress from having 'nothing' to having the 'basics'. From there on,
money(or lack of) talks, as funding the research of the subtleties
also enters the criteria. Toyota with it's bottomless money pit can
afford to do this and to hell with not making any reasonable headway,
Aguri obviously couldn't.
This isn't my nightly Aguri bashing, i have stated before that they
were my other favorite team, but in this context we got to face
reality. The Aguris usually finished not more than 3-4 places off the
bottom of the finishers list, mixing it with teams in serious trouble
themselves. Ie: Honda and Spyker. That 6th place of Takuma's was with
half the field gone and others struggling with various problems.. Was
it good to see ? Of course, but we all knew that it is somewhat
unrealistic that Sato in an Aguri could finish in front of Alonso in
the McLaren.
So yes, they did reach that "basic" level, which is enough to surprise
struggling teams and in many ways both Williams and Honda looked like
blundering newcomers last year.
--
Regards, Frank